Types of Characters in a Story — In this video, we break down four types of characters in every story (flat, round, static, and dynamic) and how writers use them all.
Character Types Explained ►► https://bit.ly/vw-ct
StudioBinder Screenwriting Software ►► http://bit.ly/sb-sw
─────────────────────
Chapters:
00:00 - Introduction to Character Types in Film
00:53 Character Types Defined
02:29 - Chapter 1: Flat vs Round
09:02 - Chapter 2: Static vs Dynamic
16:28 Chapter 3: The Shawshank Redemption Deep Dive
20:31 - Takeaways
─────────────────────
4 TYPES OF CHARACTERS IN A STORY (OR FILM)
All characters are not created equal — and they shouldn’t be. Not every character needs to be multidimensional and have a clear character arc. A good writer knows the four types of characters and how best to use them in any given story. Flat, round, static, and dynamic characters can be found everywhere, and the sooner you understand how they work, the better writer you’ll be. In this video, we’ll break down these character types, what makes them unique, and how they can even share these categories.
FLAT VS ROUND CHARACTERS
The first pair of characters are flat or round. This has nothing to do with their physical shape but thinking of them this way does help keep their differences in mind. Flat characters are uncomplicated and often defined by a single character trait. They are often used for supporting characters, comic relief, as a sort of stereotypical character, or when a character’s personality is deliberately simple. Round characters, on the other hand, have more dimension. They’re complicated, have layers to them, and are most often seen in protagonists.
DYNAMIC VS STATIC CHARACTERS
One of the most commonly heard screenwriting mantras is that characters must change. What they really mean is the “main character” must change — no one is upset when a side character who is only in one scene doesn’t have a complete character arc. Dynamic characters are those that undergo some degree of change throughout the story. Again, most protagonists are dynamic, but there are still exceptions to that “rule.” Static characters, on the opposite side, change very little or not at all.
Antagonists are often static because they need to provide the hero with consistent conflict.
Remember, while there’s no overlap within each pair (e.g., characters are either flat or round), they can be combined between the pairs. A static character can either be flat or round, for example. The types of characters at a writer’s disposal allow them to enrich their storytelling with variety and depth.
#FilmTheory #VideoEssay #Filmmaking
─────────────────────
♬ SONGS USED:
“Indy’s Very First Adventure” - John Williams
“The Flier” - Danny Elfman
“Hang Me, Oh Hang Me” - Dave Van Ronk
“We’ll Meet Again” - Vera Lynn
“Ambush on Coruscant” - John Williams
“All Lit Up” - Craig Armstrong
“Watch Me Shine” - Joanna Pacitti
“Lonely Town, Pas de deux” - Leonard Bernstein
“The Verdict” - Ennio Morricone
“Defeated Clown” - Hildur Guðnadóttir
“From The Fire” - John Carpenter
“The Theorem” - Danny Elfman
“Danke Schoen” - Wayne Newton
“Just Dropped In” - Kenny Rodgers
“Blue Blood” - Heinz Kiessling
“Flashback” - Burkhard Dallwitz
“The Winner is Little Miss Sunshine” - DeVotchka
“New Slang” - The Shins
“Waiting” - E.G. Daily
“On The Bus” - Danny Elfman
“Casablanca Suite” - Max Steiner
“Glory” - Tyler Bates
“Rock Hammer” - Thomas Newman
“Shawshank Prison (Stoic Theme)” - Thomas Newman
“Suds on the Roof” - Thomas Newman
“And That Right Soon” - Thomas Newman
“Workfield” - Thomas Newman
“Brooks Was Here” - Thomas Newman
“Building the Chair” - Carter Burwell
“He’s a Pirate” - Hans Zimmer
Music by Artlist ► https://utm.io/umJx
Music by Artgrid ► https://utm.io/umJy
Music by Soundstripe ► http://bit.ly/2IXwomF
Music by MusicBed ► http://bit.ly/2Fnz9Zq
─────────────────────
SUBSCRIBE to StudioBinder’s YouTube channel! ►► http://bit.ly/2hksYO0
Looking for a project management platform for your filmmaking? StudioBinder is an intuitive project management solution for video creatives; create shooting schedules, breakdowns, production calendars, shot lists, storyboards, call sheets and more.
Try StudioBinder for FREE today: https://studiobinder.com/pricing
— Join us on Social Media! —
Instagram ►► https://www.instagram.com/studiobinder
Facebook ►► https://www.facebook.com/studiobinderapp
Twitter ►► https://www.twitter.com/studiobinder
#film-theory, #video-essay, #filmmaker
- He has to swim in
with bow-legged women. - What makes a great character? - Nazis. I hate these guys. - Is it their complexity? Their originality? What they do or say? - I'm finished. - A good screenwriter knows
how to write a good character. And characters can come
in many shapes and sizes. - God, I love you. - These are 'The
Types of Characters'. - Before we begin make it your
character trait to subscribe to StudioBinder and
enable notifications. We will be spoiling
the following movies. Let'
s start characterizing. - You want to hear my pitch?
- Go away, goddammit. - Knowing different character types doesn't
box a writer into creating stereotypes. Instead, knowing the types of characters
can allow a writer to better understand their different players and know how
they should function within a narrative. Characters can be defined
by two different metrics. The first is flat versus round. A flat character
is one dimensional and can usually be summed
up by one distinct trait. A round ch
aracter is on the
other end of the spectrum. Multi-dimensional and complex. Typically filled with very
human contradictions. The terms were coined by E. M. Forster
in his 1927 book, 'Aspects of the Novel', where he writes, 'Flat
characters, in their purest form, are constructed
around a single idea or quality. When there is more than one
factor to them, we get the beginning of the curve toward the round'. - I understood that reference. - Characters can also be
categorized as static or dynamic. A
dynamic character undergoes
some form of change throughout a story. Whereas a static character remains
mostly the same from beginning to end. A combination of all these character
types can be found in most films. And the categorizations
aren't binary. Each character
sits on a spectrum. This means that the category a character
falls into is relatively subjective. - Pick up your mind. - Let's look closer at flat versus
round characters to understand when and why they're used. - I want the truth!
- You can't handle the truth! - Because writers are taught that complex
and realistic characters are paramount, one might assume that round characters
are more desirable than flat ones. - I'm an old broken-down
piece of meat. - But this isn't
always the case. - And I'm alone. - Flat characters can be great
for peripheral roles in a narrative. - Oh my god, I love your
skirt. Where did you get it? - Uh, it was my
mom's in the 80s. - Vintage! So adorable.
- Thanks. - That is the ugliest
effing skir
t I've ever seen. - It often doesn't make sense for a minor
character to be imbued with complexity, since this may bog
down a narrative. Flat characters can be used
to contrast with protagonists. - If I take one more step, it'll be
the farthest away from home I will be. - Samwise Gamgee is
a relatively flat character. Loyal and protective throughout
the "Lord of the Rings" series. - Get back, you!
Don't touch him! - This contrasts with Frodo. A round character who reveals
deep inner conflicts du
ring their quest. As such, Sam reminds us
of the innocence of the Shire. And how far he and
Frodo have come from it. Flat characters are
often used for comic relief. - You are the comic relief.
Yes. And you know what else? I am the hero. So shut up! - In "Anchorman", Brick is an
extremely flat character who provides a quick punchline when needed. - Loud noises! - But flat characters don't always have
to be relegated to the margins of a story. Protagonists can also be flat. This is especially tru
e in satires,
where a writer wants to poke fun at a specific type of person. - I can feel your recriminations and
your judgment and I am fine with it. - In Dr. Strangelove,
each of the main characters embodies a
one-dimensional stereotype. The flatness of the characters makes
the satire more universally applicable. - Gee, I wish we had one of them
doomsday machines, don't you? - The characters represent ideas
more than they do specific individuals. - War is too important
to be left to politician
s. They have neither the time, the training,
nor the inclination for strategic thought. - A flat protagonist can also be
used for movies focused on spectacle. In most earlier "James Bond"
films, for example, Bond is portrayed as a suave and unflappable spy. His simplicity provided a bedrock for
the films to focus on colorful villains, exotic locations, and
elaborate schemes. Later Bond entries, meanwhile,
make him more round. He is a flawed human being. As a result, the stories in recent entries
are more grounded and character-focused. Most of the time, however, writers
prefer their protagonists to be round. A round main character can provide a film
with more depth and less predictability. In "Great Gatsby", Jay Gatsby is a
round protagonist whose motives are often contradictory
and ambiguous. This adds unconventional layers
to his romance with Daisy and makes him a mysterious figure
who is both magnetic and flawed. - You shut up!
- Shut up! You shut up! Shut up! Shut up! - A round cha
racter can also
work to subvert expectations. - You got into Harvard Law? - What, like it's hard? - In "Legally Blonde", Elle Woods has
much more depth to her than meets the eye. - So if you're trying to sell it to me
for full price, you picked the wrong girl. - And this subversion
propels the story. - I love you.
- I've waited so long to hear you say that. But if I'm going to be a partner
in a law firm by the time I'm 30, I need a boyfriend who's
not such a complete bonehead. - Round protagonis
ts are
necessary for character-driven films. - Dewey Cox needs to think
about his entire life before he plays. - Since their inner complexities
are often the story's core conflict. - Wrong kid died. - In "Maestro", Leonard Bernstein and
Felicia Montalegre are both round characters. Bernstein's contradictory status
as an extroverted conductor and introverted composer
drives the story. - And if you carry
around both personalities, I suppose that means you become a
schizophrenic and that's the end
of it. - The narrative is further complicated
by Felicia's own internal contradictions. - Let's not make
excuses, he didn't fail me. - Felicia.
- No, it's, it's my own arrogance. To think I could survive
on what he could give. It's just so ironic. I would look at everyone, even my
own children, with such pity because of their longing
for his attention. It was, it was sort of a
banner I wore so proudly. I don't need, I don't need. And, look at me now. - There is no one way to
use flat and round c
haracters. - When writing either type, it is also
important to recognize whether they are static or
dynamic characters. - Ogres are like onions. - Writers are often taught
that characters should undergo change throughout a narrative. However, this isn't
always the case. Static characters can help
provide a consistent point of comparison
throughout a narrative. In "Good Will Hunting", Chucky
Sullivan's static nature highlights the change Will goes through. It is his character who inspires
Will to
evolve and emphasize a core aspect of the narrative, whether
to change or remain where you are. - Look, you're my best friend,
so don't take this the wrong way. In 20 years, if you're still
living here, coming over to my house to watch
the Patriots game. You're still working
on construction. I'll f*cking kill you. Cause tomorrow I'm
gonna wake up and I'll be 50. And I'll still be
doing this shit. It'd be an insult to watch
if you're still here in 28. Hanging around here is a
f*cking waste of yo
ur time. - Chucky will continue
being the same person. While Will is on his way to
discovering new aspects of himself. A static character can also
be a consistent source of conflict in a narrative. Antagonists are
typically static. Since if they have a change of
heart, the conflict may deflate. In "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", Principal
Rooney is committed to vindictive punishment from
beginning to end. - If Ferris thinks that he can just
coast through this month and still graduate, he is sorely m
istaken. - Providing a constant threat to
Ferris and his friends good time. - I got you, Ferris. I have dreamed about this. - Protagonists
can be static too. In "The Big Lebowski", the Dude
doesn't change much at all through the film which only heightens the
absurdity of the bizarre creeper he's gotten himself mixed up in. - I am not Mr. Lebowski, you're
Mr. Lebowski, I'm the Dude. - When a plot is as dense as the one in "Big
Lebowski", there may not be narrative room or necessity for
character
development. - Sometimes there's a man, uh. He's the man for
his time and place. He fits right in there. - Static protagonists can be
particularly useful in television series. Most sitcoms rely on characters
maintaining the same dynamic from episode to episode. - If you're saying I play
favorites, you're wrong. I love all my children equally. I don't care for Joe. - In "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia",
the gang never learns its lesson. They continue to be terrible
people from season to season
. - Oh, Gunther,
the Morality King. Hi, I'm Gunther. I've never
lit anybody on fire before. You know, you light one b*tch
on fire and everybody freaks out. Oh, you son of a bitch. It was one time and one thing.
- Relax, relax. - Dynamic characters, however,
can provide a satisfying arc, particularly if the arc shows a character
overcoming a flaw within themselves. - You want to fight me? For her? - No, I want to
fight you for me. - Scott earned the
power of self-respect. - In "Little Miss Sunshi
ne", Olive learns
that a fixation with winning isn't healthy. - A real loser is somebody that's so
afraid of not winning, they don't even try. - Now you're trying, right?
- Yeah. - Well then you're not a loser. - We're gonna have fun tomorrow, right?
- Yeah. - A dynamic character
can also feel true to life. In "Boyhood", Mason undergoes a
series of changes that parallel the changes many experience as they grow up. - Make a wish, make a wish. - In character-driven stories, a dynamic
character's a
rc doubles as the story arc. "About Schmidt" follows Warren Schmidt
at an existential crossroads after his retirement and the
death of his wife. - What really means and something,
Warren, is the knowledge that you devoted your life to
something meaningful. - He takes stock of his life on a
road trip to his daughter's wedding. - And I suppose the most you can hope
for is to make some kind of difference. But what kind of
difference have I made? - He ends the trip with a rather
pessimistic assessme
nt of his life. - I am weak, and I am a failure. There's just no
getting around it. - But a letter from his Tanzanian
sponsor child helps him realize he did make a difference after all. - One of the children I
care for is little Ndugu Umbo. Ndugu and I want you to know
that he receives all of your letters. He hopes that you
are happy in your life. He thinks of you every day. And he wants very
much your happiness. - "The Breakfast Club"
has almost zero plot. It's just five teenagers
stuck in dete
ntion. Instead of a traditional plot,
their emotional journeys provide narrative peaks and valleys. - Did you work for the money for those earrings?
- Shut your mouth! - Or did your daddy buy those?
- Shut up! - Dynamic characters can
change at different rates. Some start to change
near the beginning. - Peter?
- Yeah? - Are you alright?
- Uh, I'm fine. - Some don't change
until the very end. - I will not die a monster. - For much of "Casablanca", Rick
Blaine is stubborn and resolute. - My friend
, you could make
it a million francs or three. My answer would
still be the same. - But at the very end, he
changes and acts selflessly. - And the names are
Mr. and Mrs. Victor Laszlo. - But why my name, Richard? - Because you're
getting on that plane. - This sudden dynamism makes
the final scene all the more dramatic. - Here's looking at you, kid. - Static and dynamic characters
are equally useful when constructing a compelling narrative. The key is to arrive at either
character type deliberate
ly. A character can be either static or
dynamic, while also being round or flat. We can see all of these qualities of
work in "The Shawshank Redemption". - Get busy living,
or get busy dying. - "The Shawshank Redemption"
is filled with memorable characters. - Lord, it's a miracle! Man up and vanish
like a fart in the wind. - Based on the Stephen King novella,
writer-director Frank Darabont uses a variety of character types to
further the plot and color the world. - How can you be so obtuse?
- Wh
at? - Captain Hadley is an example
of a flat and static character. He is a one-dimensional
prison guard, cruel and vindictive. - I ain't gonna count to three. I'm not even gonna count to one. You will shut the f*ck up
or I'll sing you a lullaby. - And he maintains these
qualities throughout most of the film. - Why should I believe
a smart banker like you? So I can end up
in here with you? - The protagonist, Andy Dufresne,
is a round and static character. Andy is deeply complex. - As for Andy, he
spent that
break hunkered in the shade. A strange little
smile on his face. You could argue he'd done it
to curry favor with the guards. Or maybe make a few
friends among us cons. - He is intelligent
and resilient. Yet, he is also occasionally
jealous and passionate. It is unclear whether he
is wrongfully convicted for killing his wife and her lover. Darabont's lengthy opening
description indicates this complexity. But Andy doesn't undergo
immense change throughout the film. From beginning to e
nd, he is
dead set on obtaining freedom. It is this unwavering
want that drives the plot. Red, meanwhile, is both a
round and dynamic character. Red is fully realized with
many layers to his personality. And he also changes
as the film progresses. - They send you here for life. That's exactly what they take. - His friendship with Andy slowly
changes him from a cynical inmate. - Hope is a dangerous thing. - To a man who is able to
see hope for redemption. - I find I'm so excited I can barely
sit
still a whole of thought in my head. I think it's the excitement
only a free man can feel. A free man at the start of a long
journey whose conclusion is uncertain. - Brooks, on the other hand,
is an example of a dynamic and relatively flat character. - Are you going to eat that? - Brooks is initially depicted
as an archetypal kindly old man. His character is not very complex
due to his limited screen time. - Every evening I load up
the cart and make my round. - But when he obtains freedom, we
se
e him change, becoming more moody. - The world went and got
itself in a big damn hurry. - And in the end,
becoming his own demise. Brooks is a minor character in the film,
but his arc provides a warning to Andy. He can't let Brook's
life become his. - I better get
used to that idea. - Like Brooks did. - As such, Brooks serves the
story but is not meant to be a fully realized character himself. - I don't like it here. I'm tired of being
afraid all the time. I've decided not to stay. - As "The Sha
wshank Redemption"
shows us, different character types add variety and richness
to storytelling. No one character type
is better than another. Used with purpose, they can be used
to inform and elevate a narrative while still feeling believable
and memorable. - I've abandoned my child! I've abandoned my child! I've abandoned my boy! - In the end, a good
character is a good character. Whether they are
flat, round, dynamic. Have an idea for
your own character? Get started on your next film with
Stu
dioBinder screenwriting software. That's all for now. Remember, great
characters are everywhere.
Comments
Chapters: 00:00 - Introduction to Character Types in Film 00:53 Character Types Defined 02:29 - Chapter 1: Flat vs Round 09:02 - Chapter 2: Static vs Dynamic 16:28 Chapter 3: The Shawshank Redemption Deep Dive 20:31 - Takeaways
This is the kind of video people need in literature classes. So many writers struggle bus with the differences.
Proper theatre literature! Who needs film school when you have studio binder 😂❤
I finally understood why 'Breakfast Club' - just works.
I love how you employ a diversity of ideas on this channel. We learn that story telling, be it visual or not, is an amalgamation of a varied tool set and mind sets. There are multiple roads which lead to any destination. The only question is: which will you take?
I hope to add translation in Arabic. You have a large Arabic-speaking audience of cinema lovers and filmmakers who learn a lot from your channel’s wonderful content. Thank you for your efforts.
Please do a video on how directors and cinematographers conduct a blocking rehearsal. I love your videos so much and I've learned so much from them than any other resources, I even forgot the last time I watched other YouTube channels. Thank you so much, you've been a blessing in disguise.
Day by day Studiobinder's videos are getting better and better.
It's a complete audiovisual encyclopedia about Movie Characters. Thousand Thanks StudioBinder for this Inspiring video. Always Inspiring to learn from you StudioBinder.💯💯
Honestly I want a behind the scenes of the process of making these great videos❤ Get to see the narrator, the writers, editors, animators and the office😊
I have been watching some of your previous videos to understand filmmaking better. They have been beneficial, and this video does it again. Can you make a video about the slice-of-life genre and why people mistake it for the coming-of-age genre?
Perfect timing for this video! We're working on character sheets in my screenwriting class :)
This channel is amazing ❤ Always so enjoyable to watch, full of the things I feel but could never put into words & grabs movies I'm remarkably fond about 💕
Amazing video as always. Thank you so much.
I think this video complements perfectly the ones about character arcs. I don't know if there is one that goes deeply into character dimensions (physical, psychological and social). Anyway, this is a must see video to understand these to aspects of a character. Thank you StudioBinder 😁
this is the best gift for my brithday! Thank U studiobinder!
This one is worth watching over and over again. Thanks for sharing!
Flat vs. round can be thought of as a constant. Wherever they are on that spectrum, they remain there relatively constantly. Static vs.dynamic can be thought of as relating to the amount of moment to moment change, meaning not constant, but having peaks and valleys of different aspects over the course of the timeline. The more dynamic, the more quick peaks and valleys. IOW, dynamic characters are mercurial and less predictable than static characters, while flat or round characters are much more predictable. Of course if there is change in the character arc, it can be relatively quick change, or relatively slow change, and a character can change from any point on either spectrum to any other point, all of which can be independent of character type. What seems to work best for me (and is the way countless stories are told) is based on contrast between characters. I prefer creating a main character who is more of an everyman, bc readers or viewers can bond to that character and identify with them easier, a character who is slightly flat and slightly static (yet may have a significant change in the character arc) contrasted with a secondary character who is more mercurial and unpredictable, a little rounder and dynamic, bc they will be more interesting to follow, and the reader or viewer, bonded to and identifying with the everyman character, spends much of the story observing and/or helping the more mercurial character. One example is in The Office, where Jim Halpert is the everyman character the audience identifies with, while Michael Scott is the mercurial, unpredictable one he (and the audience) observes. That implies both solidity (Jim) and a 3-ring circus of entertainment (Michael). It gives the audience comfort in the predictability of Jim, and uniqueness and variety in the unpredictable (yet over time, paradoxically predictable) Michael. That dynamic balance of tension is one of the reasons that show ran for 8 seasons. This way there is a constant tension (usually positive) between those characters and each of them can really benefit from the other. The more mercurial character benefits from the more stable character pulling them back onto the rails and the more mercurial character shows the more stable character how life can be more interesting. They need each other. And a story often needs this. If The Office were mostly about Jim, with no Michael character, it would have been pretty boring. If it were mostly about Michael, with no Jim to contrast him with, it just would have been too chaotic for the viewer to latch on to for 8 seasons. And this dynamic can be seen in a high percentage of great stories, bc it works. All you have to do is look for it.
Thanks to John Truby & Bob Mckee I started understanding how to choose and build my character atmosphere according to the story shape
Great content. Reminds me of people that I've known that fit these descriptions and what type of character I would be within my own story.