Main

4 Types of Characters in a Film — Flat vs. Round & Static vs. Dynamic

Types of Characters in a Story — In this video, we break down four types of characters in every story (flat, round, static, and dynamic) and how writers use them all. Character Types Explained ►► https://bit.ly/vw-ct StudioBinder Screenwriting Software ►► http://bit.ly/sb-sw ───────────────────── Chapters: 00:00 - Introduction to Character Types in Film 00:53 Character Types Defined 02:29 - Chapter 1: Flat vs Round 09:02 - Chapter 2: Static vs Dynamic 16:28 Chapter 3: The Shawshank Redemption Deep Dive 20:31 - Takeaways ───────────────────── 4 TYPES OF CHARACTERS IN A STORY (OR FILM) All characters are not created equal — and they shouldn’t be. Not every character needs to be multidimensional and have a clear character arc. A good writer knows the four types of characters and how best to use them in any given story. Flat, round, static, and dynamic characters can be found everywhere, and the sooner you understand how they work, the better writer you’ll be. In this video, we’ll break down these character types, what makes them unique, and how they can even share these categories. FLAT VS ROUND CHARACTERS The first pair of characters are flat or round. This has nothing to do with their physical shape but thinking of them this way does help keep their differences in mind. Flat characters are uncomplicated and often defined by a single character trait. They are often used for supporting characters, comic relief, as a sort of stereotypical character, or when a character’s personality is deliberately simple. Round characters, on the other hand, have more dimension. They’re complicated, have layers to them, and are most often seen in protagonists. DYNAMIC VS STATIC CHARACTERS One of the most commonly heard screenwriting mantras is that characters must change. What they really mean is the “main character” must change — no one is upset when a side character who is only in one scene doesn’t have a complete character arc. Dynamic characters are those that undergo some degree of change throughout the story. Again, most protagonists are dynamic, but there are still exceptions to that “rule.” Static characters, on the opposite side, change very little or not at all. Antagonists are often static because they need to provide the hero with consistent conflict. Remember, while there’s no overlap within each pair (e.g., characters are either flat or round), they can be combined between the pairs. A static character can either be flat or round, for example. The types of characters at a writer’s disposal allow them to enrich their storytelling with variety and depth. #FilmTheory #VideoEssay #Filmmaking ───────────────────── ♬ SONGS USED: “Indy’s Very First Adventure” - John Williams “The Flier” - Danny Elfman “Hang Me, Oh Hang Me” - Dave Van Ronk “We’ll Meet Again” - Vera Lynn “Ambush on Coruscant” - John Williams “All Lit Up” - Craig Armstrong “Watch Me Shine” - Joanna Pacitti “Lonely Town, Pas de deux” - Leonard Bernstein “The Verdict” - Ennio Morricone “Defeated Clown” - Hildur Guðnadóttir “From The Fire” - John Carpenter “The Theorem” - Danny Elfman “Danke Schoen” - Wayne Newton “Just Dropped In” - Kenny Rodgers “Blue Blood” - Heinz Kiessling “Flashback” - Burkhard Dallwitz “The Winner is Little Miss Sunshine” - DeVotchka “New Slang” - The Shins “Waiting” - E.G. Daily “On The Bus” - Danny Elfman “Casablanca Suite” - Max Steiner “Glory” - Tyler Bates “Rock Hammer” - Thomas Newman “Shawshank Prison (Stoic Theme)” - Thomas Newman “Suds on the Roof” - Thomas Newman “And That Right Soon” - Thomas Newman “Workfield” - Thomas Newman “Brooks Was Here” - Thomas Newman “Building the Chair” - Carter Burwell “He’s a Pirate” - Hans Zimmer Music by Artlist ► https://utm.io/umJx Music by Artgrid ► https://utm.io/umJy Music by Soundstripe ► http://bit.ly/2IXwomF Music by MusicBed ► http://bit.ly/2Fnz9Zq ───────────────────── SUBSCRIBE to StudioBinder’s YouTube channel! ►► http://bit.ly/2hksYO0 Looking for a project management platform for your filmmaking? StudioBinder is an intuitive project management solution for video creatives; create shooting schedules, breakdowns, production calendars, shot lists, storyboards, call sheets and more. Try StudioBinder for FREE today: https://studiobinder.com/pricing — Join us on Social Media! — Instagram ►► https://www.instagram.com/studiobinder Facebook ►► https://www.facebook.com/studiobinderapp Twitter ►► https://www.twitter.com/studiobinder #film-theory, #video-essay, #filmmaker

StudioBinder

2 weeks ago

- He has to swim in with bow-legged women. - What makes a great character? - Nazis. I hate these guys. - Is it their complexity? Their originality? What they do or say? - I'm finished. - A good screenwriter knows how to write a good character. And characters can come in many shapes and sizes. - God, I love you. - These are 'The Types of Characters'. - Before we begin make it your character trait to subscribe to StudioBinder and enable notifications. We will be spoiling the following movies. Let'
s start characterizing. - You want to hear my pitch? - Go away, goddammit. - Knowing different character types doesn't box a writer into creating stereotypes. Instead, knowing the types of characters can allow a writer to better understand their different players and know how they should function within a narrative. Characters can be defined by two different metrics. The first is flat versus round. A flat character is one dimensional and can usually be summed up by one distinct trait. A round ch
aracter is on the other end of the spectrum. Multi-dimensional and complex. Typically filled with very human contradictions. The terms were coined by E. M. Forster in his 1927 book, 'Aspects of the Novel', where he writes, 'Flat characters, in their purest form, are constructed around a single idea or quality. When there is more than one factor to them, we get the beginning of the curve toward the round'. - I understood that reference. - Characters can also be categorized as static or dynamic. A
dynamic character undergoes some form of change throughout a story. Whereas a static character remains mostly the same from beginning to end. A combination of all these character types can be found in most films. And the categorizations aren't binary. Each character sits on a spectrum. This means that the category a character falls into is relatively subjective. - Pick up your mind. - Let's look closer at flat versus round characters to understand when and why they're used. - I want the truth!
- You can't handle the truth! - Because writers are taught that complex and realistic characters are paramount, one might assume that round characters are more desirable than flat ones. - I'm an old broken-down piece of meat. - But this isn't always the case. - And I'm alone. - Flat characters can be great for peripheral roles in a narrative. - Oh my god, I love your skirt. Where did you get it? - Uh, it was my mom's in the 80s. - Vintage! So adorable. - Thanks. - That is the ugliest effing skir
t I've ever seen. - It often doesn't make sense for a minor character to be imbued with complexity, since this may bog down a narrative. Flat characters can be used to contrast with protagonists. - If I take one more step, it'll be the farthest away from home I will be. - Samwise Gamgee is a relatively flat character. Loyal and protective throughout the "Lord of the Rings" series. - Get back, you! Don't touch him! - This contrasts with Frodo. A round character who reveals deep inner conflicts du
ring their quest. As such, Sam reminds us of the innocence of the Shire. And how far he and Frodo have come from it. Flat characters are often used for comic relief. - You are the comic relief. Yes. And you know what else? I am the hero. So shut up! - In "Anchorman", Brick is an extremely flat character who provides a quick punchline when needed. - Loud noises! - But flat characters don't always have to be relegated to the margins of a story. Protagonists can also be flat. This is especially tru
e in satires, where a writer wants to poke fun at a specific type of person. - I can feel your recriminations and your judgment and I am fine with it. - In Dr. Strangelove, each of the main characters embodies a one-dimensional stereotype. The flatness of the characters makes the satire more universally applicable. - Gee, I wish we had one of them doomsday machines, don't you? - The characters represent ideas more than they do specific individuals. - War is too important to be left to politician
s. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought. - A flat protagonist can also be used for movies focused on spectacle. In most earlier "James Bond" films, for example, Bond is portrayed as a suave and unflappable spy. His simplicity provided a bedrock for the films to focus on colorful villains, exotic locations, and elaborate schemes. Later Bond entries, meanwhile, make him more round. He is a flawed human being. As a result, the stories in recent entries
are more grounded and character-focused. Most of the time, however, writers prefer their protagonists to be round. A round main character can provide a film with more depth and less predictability. In "Great Gatsby", Jay Gatsby is a round protagonist whose motives are often contradictory and ambiguous. This adds unconventional layers to his romance with Daisy and makes him a mysterious figure who is both magnetic and flawed. - You shut up! - Shut up! You shut up! Shut up! Shut up! - A round cha
racter can also work to subvert expectations. - You got into Harvard Law? - What, like it's hard? - In "Legally Blonde", Elle Woods has much more depth to her than meets the eye. - So if you're trying to sell it to me for full price, you picked the wrong girl. - And this subversion propels the story. - I love you. - I've waited so long to hear you say that. But if I'm going to be a partner in a law firm by the time I'm 30, I need a boyfriend who's not such a complete bonehead. - Round protagonis
ts are necessary for character-driven films. - Dewey Cox needs to think about his entire life before he plays. - Since their inner complexities are often the story's core conflict. - Wrong kid died. - In "Maestro", Leonard Bernstein and Felicia Montalegre are both round characters. Bernstein's contradictory status as an extroverted conductor and introverted composer drives the story. - And if you carry around both personalities, I suppose that means you become a schizophrenic and that's the end
of it. - The narrative is further complicated by Felicia's own internal contradictions. - Let's not make excuses, he didn't fail me. - Felicia. - No, it's, it's my own arrogance. To think I could survive on what he could give. It's just so ironic. I would look at everyone, even my own children, with such pity because of their longing for his attention. It was, it was sort of a banner I wore so proudly. I don't need, I don't need. And, look at me now. - There is no one way to use flat and round c
haracters. - When writing either type, it is also important to recognize whether they are static or dynamic characters. - Ogres are like onions. - Writers are often taught that characters should undergo change throughout a narrative. However, this isn't always the case. Static characters can help provide a consistent point of comparison throughout a narrative. In "Good Will Hunting", Chucky Sullivan's static nature highlights the change Will goes through. It is his character who inspires Will to
evolve and emphasize a core aspect of the narrative, whether to change or remain where you are. - Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way. In 20 years, if you're still living here, coming over to my house to watch the Patriots game. You're still working on construction. I'll f*cking kill you. Cause tomorrow I'm gonna wake up and I'll be 50. And I'll still be doing this shit. It'd be an insult to watch if you're still here in 28. Hanging around here is a f*cking waste of yo
ur time. - Chucky will continue being the same person. While Will is on his way to discovering new aspects of himself. A static character can also be a consistent source of conflict in a narrative. Antagonists are typically static. Since if they have a change of heart, the conflict may deflate. In "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", Principal Rooney is committed to vindictive punishment from beginning to end. - If Ferris thinks that he can just coast through this month and still graduate, he is sorely m
istaken. - Providing a constant threat to Ferris and his friends good time. - I got you, Ferris. I have dreamed about this. - Protagonists can be static too. In "The Big Lebowski", the Dude doesn't change much at all through the film which only heightens the absurdity of the bizarre creeper he's gotten himself mixed up in. - I am not Mr. Lebowski, you're Mr. Lebowski, I'm the Dude. - When a plot is as dense as the one in "Big Lebowski", there may not be narrative room or necessity for character
development. - Sometimes there's a man, uh. He's the man for his time and place. He fits right in there. - Static protagonists can be particularly useful in television series. Most sitcoms rely on characters maintaining the same dynamic from episode to episode. - If you're saying I play favorites, you're wrong. I love all my children equally. I don't care for Joe. - In "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia", the gang never learns its lesson. They continue to be terrible people from season to season
. - Oh, Gunther, the Morality King. Hi, I'm Gunther. I've never lit anybody on fire before. You know, you light one b*tch on fire and everybody freaks out. Oh, you son of a bitch. It was one time and one thing. - Relax, relax. - Dynamic characters, however, can provide a satisfying arc, particularly if the arc shows a character overcoming a flaw within themselves. - You want to fight me? For her? - No, I want to fight you for me. - Scott earned the power of self-respect. - In "Little Miss Sunshi
ne", Olive learns that a fixation with winning isn't healthy. - A real loser is somebody that's so afraid of not winning, they don't even try. - Now you're trying, right? - Yeah. - Well then you're not a loser. - We're gonna have fun tomorrow, right? - Yeah. - A dynamic character can also feel true to life. In "Boyhood", Mason undergoes a series of changes that parallel the changes many experience as they grow up. - Make a wish, make a wish. - In character-driven stories, a dynamic character's a
rc doubles as the story arc. "About Schmidt" follows Warren Schmidt at an existential crossroads after his retirement and the death of his wife. - What really means and something, Warren, is the knowledge that you devoted your life to something meaningful. - He takes stock of his life on a road trip to his daughter's wedding. - And I suppose the most you can hope for is to make some kind of difference. But what kind of difference have I made? - He ends the trip with a rather pessimistic assessme
nt of his life. - I am weak, and I am a failure. There's just no getting around it. - But a letter from his Tanzanian sponsor child helps him realize he did make a difference after all. - One of the children I care for is little Ndugu Umbo. Ndugu and I want you to know that he receives all of your letters. He hopes that you are happy in your life. He thinks of you every day. And he wants very much your happiness. - "The Breakfast Club" has almost zero plot. It's just five teenagers stuck in dete
ntion. Instead of a traditional plot, their emotional journeys provide narrative peaks and valleys. - Did you work for the money for those earrings? - Shut your mouth! - Or did your daddy buy those? - Shut up! - Dynamic characters can change at different rates. Some start to change near the beginning. - Peter? - Yeah? - Are you alright? - Uh, I'm fine. - Some don't change until the very end. - I will not die a monster. - For much of "Casablanca", Rick Blaine is stubborn and resolute. - My friend
, you could make it a million francs or three. My answer would still be the same. - But at the very end, he changes and acts selflessly. - And the names are Mr. and Mrs. Victor Laszlo. - But why my name, Richard? - Because you're getting on that plane. - This sudden dynamism makes the final scene all the more dramatic. - Here's looking at you, kid. - Static and dynamic characters are equally useful when constructing a compelling narrative. The key is to arrive at either character type deliberate
ly. A character can be either static or dynamic, while also being round or flat. We can see all of these qualities of work in "The Shawshank Redemption". - Get busy living, or get busy dying. - "The Shawshank Redemption" is filled with memorable characters. - Lord, it's a miracle! Man up and vanish like a fart in the wind. - Based on the Stephen King novella, writer-director Frank Darabont uses a variety of character types to further the plot and color the world. - How can you be so obtuse? - Wh
at? - Captain Hadley is an example of a flat and static character. He is a one-dimensional prison guard, cruel and vindictive. - I ain't gonna count to three. I'm not even gonna count to one. You will shut the f*ck up or I'll sing you a lullaby. - And he maintains these qualities throughout most of the film. - Why should I believe a smart banker like you? So I can end up in here with you? - The protagonist, Andy Dufresne, is a round and static character. Andy is deeply complex. - As for Andy, he
spent that break hunkered in the shade. A strange little smile on his face. You could argue he'd done it to curry favor with the guards. Or maybe make a few friends among us cons. - He is intelligent and resilient. Yet, he is also occasionally jealous and passionate. It is unclear whether he is wrongfully convicted for killing his wife and her lover. Darabont's lengthy opening description indicates this complexity. But Andy doesn't undergo immense change throughout the film. From beginning to e
nd, he is dead set on obtaining freedom. It is this unwavering want that drives the plot. Red, meanwhile, is both a round and dynamic character. Red is fully realized with many layers to his personality. And he also changes as the film progresses. - They send you here for life. That's exactly what they take. - His friendship with Andy slowly changes him from a cynical inmate. - Hope is a dangerous thing. - To a man who is able to see hope for redemption. - I find I'm so excited I can barely sit
still a whole of thought in my head. I think it's the excitement only a free man can feel. A free man at the start of a long journey whose conclusion is uncertain. - Brooks, on the other hand, is an example of a dynamic and relatively flat character. - Are you going to eat that? - Brooks is initially depicted as an archetypal kindly old man. His character is not very complex due to his limited screen time. - Every evening I load up the cart and make my round. - But when he obtains freedom, we se
e him change, becoming more moody. - The world went and got itself in a big damn hurry. - And in the end, becoming his own demise. Brooks is a minor character in the film, but his arc provides a warning to Andy. He can't let Brook's life become his. - I better get used to that idea. - Like Brooks did. - As such, Brooks serves the story but is not meant to be a fully realized character himself. - I don't like it here. I'm tired of being afraid all the time. I've decided not to stay. - As "The Sha
wshank Redemption" shows us, different character types add variety and richness to storytelling. No one character type is better than another. Used with purpose, they can be used to inform and elevate a narrative while still feeling believable and memorable. - I've abandoned my child! I've abandoned my child! I've abandoned my boy! - In the end, a good character is a good character. Whether they are flat, round, dynamic. Have an idea for your own character? Get started on your next film with Stu
dioBinder screenwriting software. That's all for now. Remember, great characters are everywhere.

Comments

@StudioBinder

Chapters: 00:00 - Introduction to Character Types in Film 00:53 Character Types Defined 02:29 - Chapter 1: Flat vs Round 09:02 - Chapter 2: Static vs Dynamic 16:28 Chapter 3: The Shawshank Redemption Deep Dive 20:31 - Takeaways

@Firegen1

This is the kind of video people need in literature classes. So many writers struggle bus with the differences.

@wolexismedia

Proper theatre literature! Who needs film school when you have studio binder 😂❤

@mainstay.

I finally understood why 'Breakfast Club' - just works.

@jessebbedwell

I love how you employ a diversity of ideas on this channel. We learn that story telling, be it visual or not, is an amalgamation of a varied tool set and mind sets. There are multiple roads which lead to any destination. The only question is: which will you take?

@ahmedalsammar1632

I hope to add translation in Arabic. You have a large Arabic-speaking audience of cinema lovers and filmmakers who learn a lot from your channel’s wonderful content. Thank you for your efforts.

@SocioSpectives

Please do a video on how directors and cinematographers conduct a blocking rehearsal. I love your videos so much and I've learned so much from them than any other resources, I even forgot the last time I watched other YouTube channels. Thank you so much, you've been a blessing in disguise.

@akibtafhim

Day by day Studiobinder's videos are getting better and better.

@rayancedrichaddad1197

It's a complete audiovisual encyclopedia about Movie Characters. Thousand Thanks StudioBinder for this Inspiring video. Always Inspiring to learn from you StudioBinder.💯💯

@ThomasHatteland

Honestly I want a behind the scenes of the process of making these great videos❤ Get to see the narrator, the writers, editors, animators and the office😊

@ngziin9975

I have been watching some of your previous videos to understand filmmaking better. They have been beneficial, and this video does it again. Can you make a video about the slice-of-life genre and why people mistake it for the coming-of-age genre?

@elizabethw5986

Perfect timing for this video! We're working on character sheets in my screenwriting class :)

@Djwhynotlove

This channel is amazing ❤ Always so enjoyable to watch, full of the things I feel but could never put into words & grabs movies I'm remarkably fond about 💕

@jake.walker.official

Amazing video as always. Thank you so much.

@tonatiuhaguilar1860

I think this video complements perfectly the ones about character arcs. I don't know if there is one that goes deeply into character dimensions (physical, psychological and social). Anyway, this is a must see video to understand these to aspects of a character. Thank you StudioBinder 😁

@arieelloo

this is the best gift for my brithday! Thank U studiobinder!

@onuohaudochukwu6180

This one is worth watching over and over again. Thanks for sharing!

@tomlewis4748

Flat vs. round can be thought of as a constant. Wherever they are on that spectrum, they remain there relatively constantly. Static vs.dynamic can be thought of as relating to the amount of moment to moment change, meaning not constant, but having peaks and valleys of different aspects over the course of the timeline. The more dynamic, the more quick peaks and valleys. IOW, dynamic characters are mercurial and less predictable than static characters, while flat or round characters are much more predictable. Of course if there is change in the character arc, it can be relatively quick change, or relatively slow change, and a character can change from any point on either spectrum to any other point, all of which can be independent of character type. What seems to work best for me (and is the way countless stories are told) is based on contrast between characters. I prefer creating a main character who is more of an everyman, bc readers or viewers can bond to that character and identify with them easier, a character who is slightly flat and slightly static (yet may have a significant change in the character arc) contrasted with a secondary character who is more mercurial and unpredictable, a little rounder and dynamic, bc they will be more interesting to follow, and the reader or viewer, bonded to and identifying with the everyman character, spends much of the story observing and/or helping the more mercurial character. One example is in The Office, where Jim Halpert is the everyman character the audience identifies with, while Michael Scott is the mercurial, unpredictable one he (and the audience) observes. That implies both solidity (Jim) and a 3-ring circus of entertainment (Michael). It gives the audience comfort in the predictability of Jim, and uniqueness and variety in the unpredictable (yet over time, paradoxically predictable) Michael. That dynamic balance of tension is one of the reasons that show ran for 8 seasons. This way there is a constant tension (usually positive) between those characters and each of them can really benefit from the other. The more mercurial character benefits from the more stable character pulling them back onto the rails and the more mercurial character shows the more stable character how life can be more interesting. They need each other. And a story often needs this. If The Office were mostly about Jim, with no Michael character, it would have been pretty boring. If it were mostly about Michael, with no Jim to contrast him with, it just would have been too chaotic for the viewer to latch on to for 8 seasons. And this dynamic can be seen in a high percentage of great stories, bc it works. All you have to do is look for it.

@ssprezzatura

Thanks to John Truby & Bob Mckee I started understanding how to choose and build my character atmosphere according to the story shape

@CamiloM-iy7qd

Great content. Reminds me of people that I've known that fit these descriptions and what type of character I would be within my own story.