Animal Movie Review | Navigating the Left Liberal Ecosystem: What You Need to Know

They say that the feeling of revenge is instilling in the society, they are talking about blanket ban of the film, those who have been making allegations till now, the name of the villain is Abrar Haq, we are Abrar Haq, how can he be a villain? Anupama Chopra is continuously criticizing them. She kept messaging me saying give me an interview, give me an interview, give me an interview for this film and said, when I gave the interview, she completely changed the narrative, her audience has mature

d and is watching a lot of things and this reviewer was left somewhere behind. Namaste Ramra Narmade Har, this is my new channel Digital Jugali and this is its first podcast, we are recording with Prashant ji, I make more logs on Narmada, on Narmada Parikrama, the life around Narmada river is beyond that, beyond that, like this. Podcasts on these topics were not getting set in its algorithm, so I have started a new channel and the idea behind it is that these are the current topics of India and

a lot of content is beyond what we are consuming digitally. What happens is that sometimes a thing is spread through the ecosystem and after that people forget it after consuming it, later that thing was a lie, it was true, there was half truth in it, half was lie, it is not remembered and then a If a new narrative comes , then my aim of starting this channel is that first the complete narrative comes, we too watch it and just like a buffalo chews its cud, first it eats it and then takes it out

and chews it well again. If she is eating food regularly and will chew less, then her digestion will not be done properly, then we will also do digital cud. We will first let that news come slowly and then we will review it and we will call Prashant ji from time to time. Will remain in our channel and this review will continue to be done with them, so what happened now is that we saw a narrative that the film Animal is very violent and anti-women, it has a lot of sex, it is fun, it is sensual an

d many more. It means it is not worth watching, it is an adult and I also accepted this narrative without seeing the film. The interesting thing is that Prashant ji, whatever small write ups came in it, this time the big ones came anonymously. Those write-ups with names that we don't know were going to hit our psychology. After reading that, we thought that no, how will we watch such a bad film, what else was Bollywood, the name of Bollywood is going bad these days, so we accepted it. I thought

that this is another garbage presented by Bollywood and don't go to see it. The nationalist YouTubers have also woken up for the past few days. I think it has been almost three weeks since the film was released and I was seeing it in the newspapers. Like the daily movie shows in Dainik Bhaskar are not decreasing, we mean 121 shows are going on it and then I went to Book My Show and saw that about 40% shows are going with the occupancy sometimes at 60. I did not understand it but when you posted

that day, after reviewing your post, you must have seen that before that I had posted completely opposite to it, yes, this film is not worth watching, after your post, then when I This discussion is also about why there was opposition to it, what is the problem with the ecosystem and how much of the opposition is based on facts. We will not individually discuss the people who have a lot of problems because everyone has problems but we will discuss their main issues. I have noted down what was th

eir problem, so we are starting from what I have seen in the voices of protest, they are talking about a kind of blanket ban, the allegations that they have been making against us till now, that you mean blanket ban on Pathans. You had banned Jawan, you had blanket banned Jawan and that is wrong, their argument behind it was that there is a whole industry, people are getting employment, we have a unit of 2300 people working, when you ban and the film If it flops , then a lot of people are lost,

the market is lost and you will remember that when these soldiers went to get the film released, they had taken the support of Modi ji and had given him the message that brother, this is how Don't talk about banning animals. Let the industry work but on the contrary, the same ecosystem is talking about banning animals. They are the kind of YouTubers who are telling that 10 points why you should not watch this film. A YouTuber is at this level. You went to the extent of saying that this film is c

ancer, so because of that, when you wrote that review, please also tell our audience what you liked about this film, the direction of the film is very good, the story is good, the editing of the film is very good. The pace is maintained and at that pace, the audience does not get confused at times as it gets cut. When we go or the story moves backward or forward, one has to think, this does not happen in this film, then the music is very good, the camera has worked well, the violence has also be

en shown in such a way that it does not create anxiety and is not disturbing and this The message that comes out of the entire film is not negative from anywhere, overall it has been made a commercial film in every way, the things in it are there in commercial films which is an expectation, the masala and masala is complete but even after that the film is of India. Well, it is close to India, it is close to India, how is this, the things that you are saying are causing a lot of trouble to a part

icular section of people, this is what, as far as I am able to understand, they are saying that There is violence in him and he beats his wife and kills people. Do they have a problem with him? Is this the real reason? There is no scene of him beating his wife. Well, it is the wife who beats him and he gets angry with her and beats her. Then he puts his hand on her feet and convinces her that we are where the violence is. So I have seen the scenes of violence in the film in such a way that it is

one of the biggest, perhaps that scene is 15-18 minutes long. Now I could not see the clock but it is long. There is a hotel scene, there is a hotel scene where there is a fight, the hero is wearing a dhoti kurta, white dhoti kurta, the rest of the people who have come have been made to wear dark suits and golden masks, this creates an impact in the scene. It has been done, it has been done, but they have avoided showing any different faces, injured bodies, so there is such a big fight scene, t

here is such a long fight scene, by showing it, they have kept the attention of the Indian audience. And the song that plays in the background is Hari Singh Nalwa on his son Arjun Nalwa who fought against the British and who was Nalwa himself who fought against the invading Afghans. I think all these things hurt him more. Whose name he is not taking in his video but is completely opposing the film, he is opposing the film and his attitude towards women is wrong. It should be told whether the wro

ng villain is his attitude towards women. Our hero's attitude towards women is very good. There is no such message in the film, but one should not speak untruth. If there is opposition then it is fine, but while protesting, at least keep your view. Protest but tell the truth. So tell me, do justice to the audience who is watching with you. I was just listening to the interview of Sandeep Reddy Vanga who is its director. Now he started giving his interviews openly in which he said that Anupama Ch

opra kept messaging him continuously that I Give an interview, give an interview, give an interview for this film and said, when I gave the interview, he completely changed his narrative. The second one was Rajeev Masand, so he organizes a round table for him, he was calling him for that on his channel, so Wanga ji. Said very clearly that brother, whatever you have to say is what you have to say, so the relationship between me and you is that you go to the theater, watch my film and write your r

eview, I don't want to talk to you, okay, this interview happened these days, this happened these days, this Now he also started speaking openly that well, he said that when he made Arjun Reddy, if 20 people were protesting, now by the time we reached Animal, there were 50 of us and earlier the protest was very mild, this time it is something different. You must have noticed that Anupama Chopra had released a film in between, there was a very vulgar film in it, Deepika Padukone was in it, there

was Gahiyaan or some such name, if you look at the reviews of these people, these people are so selective that Whose film should I say good? Whose film should I say brother? I said that a person is also the target, there is a narrative and there is a person. Yes, it is possible to review the story in the form of reviews of our own people. Reviewing is a different thing and a different thing. Launching a campaign so that people don't even reach the theater is a different thing. He is a very respe

cted user who is followed a lot by our teenagers, the youth of our country and I want to put a figure in front of the audience. I will share the screenshot that today, before recording the interview, we saw that the trailer of Animal got about 7.3 crore views and the film review of those who are calling this film cancer got one crore views. I said that I will also talk to you about what other such films have come, before that, the instant film that comes to my mind is Gangs of Wasseypur. Now I s

aid, brother, the man who has become a priest of non-violence, we and others are violent. He is refusing to watch movies. What is his view about that movie? That gentleman's [laughter] and when you call Gangs of Wasir a cult classic, then how do you call Animals a cancer ? Well, when you If you read his review and will listen to it completely, then a psychological research in Harvard, such and such research in America, a research on father and son in Germany, a lot of research, he kept explainin

g to you that this story is about Sandeep Wanga, first of all he should go to him and get it approved. Sandeep Vanga's mistake was that he made the film without taking NOC from those people. First, approval had to be taken from these critics. Approval had to be taken from them. They had to take NOC. There is freedom of artist, freedom of expression, yes diversity, there is no place for it. Whatever is the cult, this cult does not suit the classics, it does not suit the classics, one, I also see

this, that is, it is not my allegation, but it is an observation, take youtube0 Bharti, if on Ajit Bharti's videos, he gets 1 in 24 hours. If lakhs and a half lakhs and two lakhs views come, then it will come in millions. Yes, it will come in millions. I think that because an organized system has been working for a long time, there is a system behind it too. It is an invisible system, but it is visible to me, the reason is this. Is there any such quality content coming or is there any great vari

ety in that content, it is not like that, this is the gentleman we are talking about and all such people, I see that when they open two newspapers, some of the things are there. After that, we go to Wikipedia and put our stories in it and ask it. There is no research in it, there are no references in it, even if there are references, they are from certain people and people with certain ideas. But they are spread so much that they start dominating it. This is all that is seen in the scene. It is

said that this film is instilling the feeling of revenge in the society and this is a dialogue from the film which is called a cult class. They celebrate a lot whenever Nawazuddin Siddiqui is called in Kapil Sharma show or anywhere, Faizal will take revenge of father, brother, grandfather, everyone. When he is taking revenge of the entire family, then it seems to be a cult classic for them, okay this is Sholay and If we go to the films behind that , then revenge has been the permanent theme of o

ur films. We, you take the mainstream films, which are Mother India, there are other films, there was a film of Mithun, Intekaam, yes, there was a song in it, 'Woh Intekaam Loonga Apne Baaju Se' . So you will see that in the last 50 years, in 40 years, thousands of films have come out, perhaps only revenge, whose main theme is revenge, suddenly a feeling of vengeance, a feeling of vengeance and many other things are coming in the society through one film, so this is the cult. It goes against the

cult of these people who are using it, how widespread it has become. Mahesh Manjrekar had made a film in Marathi, it has a long name, it came out recently and it is about juvenile delinquents. Killing a child you know and stabbing different people with a knife means it is such a film that it disturbs you, a good review of that film is being written that it is a very good film made on juvenile delinquency or juvenile delinquency, you like Animal. You will see, you will not be disturbed, you will

see that film, you will be disturbed, violence in different and naked forms, then no one there is saying, hey, what are you showing teenagers doing, you are saying that you are showing the truth, so I feel like this. What you talked about is that the audience has become mature and is seeing a lot of things and these critics are left behind. There is a narrative of these critics, tell us about that too. They say that if films like Animal Film, And if India is made then the youth of India will go

astray and the society of India will be ruined. When we were hearing this before watching the film, we were also feeling that what has Bollywood people done and this whole narrative setting gang. Till now, this gang felt that if they set the narrative, they will destroy the others by setting the narrative, but their troubles are increasing day by day as the film is becoming a hit and it is India's biggest hit in the adult category. It has become the most superhit film of all time in the adult c

ategory. No film has earned so much money till now. I saw one interesting thing in it. I came across one last night and a similar review was running on Y. Now the audience is interested in this film. First they are venting their anger on the film and now they are venting their anger on the audience for making such a film a superhit. Now you look at this language and this thinking, the same thing has happened that because BJP government has come in three states, we were calling the voters also as

psychopaths, now they are calling the audience also as psychopaths, it has gone further in this. What you are saying has also been given a political twist. Those who say this are senior journalists and so-called intellectuals and they say that now this has to happen. What is the mental state of the audience who made this film a super hit? Are they psychopaths? Yes, those people further say that in a country where Narendra Modi can become the Prime Minister and can remain the Prime Minister for

10 years, in that country such films will definitely be made and will run and people are clapping and whistling. This is a very painful time. I am telling you this in a sentence. Now, what are you telling the reason behind it? What is the problem for him? I have seen that he focuses on two things, one is the narration from any film, if the set is set according to him. It is not happening, we and the other person are also the target. Okay, so you will see that a film or a web series is praised be

cause it has been made by a certain person. Yes, and there is opposition because it has been made by a certain person. Okay. And when you are seeing this about Animal, the other earlier films made by the same director are also being criticized. Yes, at that time too, Vanga had said that if at that time 20 If there were, then we have become 50 opponents and they say that it doesn't matter to me, it does n't matter to the audience too, it doesn't matter, they say that this is an A grade film from

the first day, we have a censor certificate of A. And if you have this much trouble then don't go to watch the movie, you are not my audience, we are your choice, we are the second one, if you want to sing such a moral song, then watch cartoon TV, not you, as we said in the beginning that you are talking about morality. What you are doing is also based on facts. Is there anything like this in the story of the film? Is their problem that the name of the villain is Abrar Haq? We know, Abrar Haq, h

ow can he be a villain when you talk with this mentality i.e. Gabbar? Singh can be a villain, Jagga the dacoit can be a villain, but Abrar can't be Haq, well, Gabbar Singh can be a villain, what was the name of Gabbar Singh's father in Sholay, I don't remember Gabbar Singh, Vardha Hari Singh, yes yes, you just told that. Hari Singh Jo Hai Hum Hari Singh Nalve Pe Ye Geet Hai May Be It's A Coincidence Yes May Be May Be There Is No Objection There Yes Yes Abhi Jo Abhi Jo Sanjay Dutt became the vill

ain in the film in which he had a tattoo on his forehead We have proper Tilak and he has a mat with Tripund applied, we and he are also wearing a saffron shawl in my opinion, he is a villain, then there is no problem, yes, the way Guru-disciple relationship has been shown in Sacred Games. You are showing it by linking it with homosexuality and in great detail and in a very vulgar manner you are showing that there is no problem there and so many web series have come which are completely imaginary

and in which so called Hindu fascism has come, yes our Swastika. Swastika has nothing to do with violence. Swastika means prosperity, progress and happiness. So this is not acceptable. What are they saying that violence is being promoted in the name of Hitler because somewhere they want to link Modi ji with Hitler. It is also happening now that some similar people have started posting such content and video blogs that when Hitler took power, these people had got his Parliament attacked and we a

nd him again. You are doing all this by pointing out and linking it with the people who entered the Parliament just now and brother, we should learn a lesson from history and what dictators do, and then you are doing the same through the film, then as I told you now. You are bringing the Prime Minister in the review, this whole narrative is politically motivated and because of that it is creating so much chaos and as far as I know, I may be wrong, I have seen such a film for the first time in my

life in which the third The story of the film starts with the wife, Villain's statement that two brothers are already married, the third one who is of his child's age is getting married, he tries to have physical relations with his wife in the reception itself, that shows the villain's mentality. Wanting and in the next scene he probably collectively, that scene was cut but that gesture was towards us. Bobby Deyal has played that character very well. I also heard and watched the interviews of B

obby Deyal and Bobby Deyal said that meaning He is overwhelmed by the audience's liking for him. He had the physique in that character and people's complaint was that Babu Deval should have got a little more role. Babu Deval did a good role, he did a good role and he fit perfectly in the role of a dumb villain. Now this is the director's own. Vision is, if I understand what you are saying, among the people who are protesting in India, are there more communists or more people of that ideology or

Muslims, then I have seen very little opposition to the Animal film, yes, you are saying the truth. Actually, the first front is handled by the so-called intellectuals of a particular ideology. If you look at many historical facts, it is like that first they manage the front and then instigate the society. Now their problem is this. It has been said that nowadays social media and all these things have become so fast that they are not able to get that much time and hence the propaganda which is t

here fails, so I feel that the audience is mature because of what you talked about. It's done and he is watching a lot of things and this reviewer is left behind somewhere. The children in my house sometimes watch Karan Johar's Koffee with Karan and many a times I feel that we Maybe it has happened a little in the previous generation, during the time when Deepika Padukone and Ranveer Singh's show was running, she was parallelly evolving with many men and this thing she felt very comfortable in t

he presence of Ranveer Singh in Koffee with Karan. She is speaking from and our children are sitting and listening to this and you are watching all these gossip level shows of Karan Jahar, which earlier used to come from gossip magazines, now these shows have come, we have no objection in that, this is the new generation. She is talking very openly on these topics. Now the era of one or two boyfriends and girlfriends is going on. Now you have put the entire blame on the animal. You have not come

, he is acceptable, he is a fan and he is also promoted. And all the same things are being imposed on another film, so an agenda is good and there is nothing like that in this film, there is nothing like that in this film, there is no criticism of it and if we say in the Indian context, then we also have web series and Since when did the movies start moving in that direction and as you said that they are being called cult classics, then there is an agenda, apart from the agenda, I do not see any

thing in it, otherwise it is a doctor, this is what we understand, okay Prashant ji. One interesting thing I saw in this was that when I was researching it, a Pakistani channel Hum came to my notice, it is very jolly bande hain char, the name of their channel is also Char Hoshiyar Hum. I will appeal to the audience for the review of the film. You see it yourself, someone gave three and a half marks out of five, someone gave four marks and in that film they did not take any objection as to what w

as the name of the villain and why was it there, so Pakistanis have no problem with this whole story. He said that the son can become violent because the father did not give him time and it must have had a psychological impact on him, but the loyalty he has for his father is the same. This is also the Pakistani issue that you raised. People of Pakistan are not feeling bad. We have such people sitting here who are more Pakistani than the Pakistanis. In this country there has been one class which

is more English than the British and another class has become such that it is more Pakistani than the Pakistanis. I said that when that Hari Singh Nalve music was played, they said that we were feeling goosebumps, yes, that too is good and there is a very large section of Punjabis who think that yes, they are in Pakistan and Pakistan is Pakistan's, which is Punjab's and That Greater Punjab is mostly the same and they understood it completely and they should say that if they are watching it impar

tially then they are praising it. They praised the direction. Cinematography and action are of Hollywood level. VF is very good and fast. The pace is editing, the editing is very good, the editing is tight, yes, people can review the story in the form of reviews, it is a different thing to review and starting a campaign so that people do not even reach the theater is a different thing. A very good thing comes to mind from the context of Pakistan, there is a class of media and bloggers in Pakista

n which carries forward the propaganda of Pakistan's ISI, anti-India frenzy, opposition to Hindus, opposition to Jews, opposition to every modern thing, support of Taliban, this is a There is that class but apart from that, there is an independent media there, many young bloggers have stood up, there are many Pakistanis in it, who today are of Pakistani origin but are living outside Pakistan, some are in Canada. Some people in Britain and US now talk openly about the mistakes made in the history

of Pakistan, they raise questions on the partition and say that the hatred that we have been taught against India and Hindus has led to the destruction of Pakistan. The entire society has become poisonous that India is giving scientists and engineers to the world, we are giving terrorists to the world, they are understanding this, the art culture of India, the tolerance of the Hindu society of India, the festivals of all these things. The diversity that they are saying is our heritage too, we a

re far away from it, but the class in India that we are talking about right now has the same mentality as the ISI, they are talking with the same mentality and there are some scenes in this film. I have brought the index from you: Hero drinks cow urine, Hero performs Havan, Hero goes to church and tells the priest that this is Swastika, it is not a Nazi symbol, three marriages of the villain, we and many such elements are there , what is the problem in this? They are definitely causing this pain

because the other things you are saying are not in the story. You are saying that it is domestic violence. What do you call domestic violence? A father tells his son to save his sister in school. He took the gun and went away, on this the father slaps him. The son, who was also 17 years old at that time, would this be called domestic violence? To his sisters, he says, to his younger sister, he says, this, this, this. The people you are saying hello to on social media cannot become your life par

tner. Look and decide wisely. Not only this, he tells his sister to concentrate on her family business, he also says that now this includes What is being said is that there is a male perspective, there is domestic violence, there is a bad attitude towards women, so I have not seen anywhere in it, the audience is also able to understand this difference, the film which I said in the beginning, is a lot of things. Despite such things that the conversation is in a very open language, there are many

such things which the older generation does not digest immediately. Despite all this, the film is close to the original Indianness and perhaps this is the problem, perhaps this is the problem. Firstly, from the point of view of narrative, secondly, if you see in that film, when there is a crisis in the family, he goes to his family, goes to the village, even if people are angry there, he convinces them and says that he should seek help from his brothers. I have come and brothers come prepared. E

ssence, well, he is a brother and a Sikh. Brother is a Sikh. He is a Punjabi. Yes Mona, perhaps this must be a problem because that effort is going on to create a divide. Yes, this is also a problem. Wife is South Indian, Wife is South Indian, in fact, this is the real society in India, which tolerates this openness and open thinking, always hiding it and imposing so-called intolerance on the society, those who have been doing this kind of work have a lot of trouble. It is happening and our soci

ety is also like this, if you are, many of your friends are Sikhs, my friends are Sikhs, Muslims are South Indians, there are Christians and we go to their festivals, we go to their homes, talk to their parents and so on. When Cosmoprof puja takes place, does any Sikh brother pull his hand back saying no, we will not take Prasad, but those who want to talk about separatism buy these things. The problem is that today in the era of such vibrant media and social media, now they cannot speak openly.

If not, then excuses are being found that it is anti-women, violence, revenge, main agent, this is what I understood and Prashant ji, the interesting thing was that when I went to the show, it had been almost three weeks since the film was finished. Occupancy was at 60, for one, in the third week the occupancy was at 60 and in that 60 too, I think 50-60 of the audience was women, yes women and they were enjoying the film, it was not like that, meaning the film started and after an hour people H

e left and said, what nonsense are you showing, brother, a woman MP has said in the Parliament House that our children came back crying, I did not see anyone crying, everyone there was laughing in the three and a quarter hour film. Didn't see anyone going, people were having fun, they were enjoying and Sandeep Manga Reddy says brother, I held you by the collar so I called you to watch the movie, no it is an adult movie, it is a violent movie according to me, it is violent, he said my character.

This is how he gets angry. If you like it then watch it. If you don't like it then don't watch it. There is no compulsion. Brother, even the hero of Zanjeer gets angry. Yes, this is an expression and that is the type of character. The film is based on him. What to tease, let me add one thing first Is there more violence than Sholay? Is there more violence than blood and character and what is it that the technology of cinema at the time of Sholay and today's time, apart from that, the taste of th

e audience has all changed but as much as it was in the 70's and 80's. I am not seeing any change in the violence that used to be there in the films of that era from what it was in the 90s, but these other films like Gangs of Wasseypur, Sacred Games, many web series are running, the violence and vulgarity shown in them. And vulgarity, that vulgarity is not there in this film, there is no vulgarity in this one, and that is why because of that dialogue, the censor board must have given it a catego

ry, I think, to show today's generation and that one class, they have included it and as far as As far as violence is concerned, there is a lot of violence and it is being served in various forms on OTT platform on your mobile. And take the language also, this is a game of throws. Now there is a scene in which a person is hanged i.e. in the neck. After hanging him with a noose , someone else came and tore the man's stomach with a sword and all his internal organs were falling on the ground. We a

re not objecting to this. Yes, Games of Thrones is the first choice series of our youth. I like Mirzapur, Mirzapur, you see the language of Mirzapur, the language of Mirzapur, the scenes and violence of Mirzapur. Yes, when you see all these things, you will realize that violence is a part of the story in this film, but the intention is to show the film in a violent manner. I have not seen any parallel Hollywood movies which are as violent as Animal and have been a hit and liked there. You have a

sked a very good question about whether it is liked in India and I also wrote this in the review in which you talked. There was a trend that has just started, there is more emphasis on dark comedy, which we call violence, but the violence is presented in such a way that it does not arouse curiosity in the mind and when I was watching it, I was like When I went to see the film, I did not see the name of the director or anything about him, I just saw it. When I went to see the film, what was comin

g to my mind was that man, this is some RRR and Django unch pal fiction, this is all about that. It's like a cocktail, it's a combination of things, and the filmmaker has succeeded in his objective, or a Wolf of Wall Street had come, yes, look at his language, that is, there were abuses in every second sentence, and vulgar abuses, this and that . It is common brother, they give that category to that type of film. Yes, there are abuses in the films with the President and our audience likes it and

this is the youth, see now one of our youth . Especially there is a large section of urban youth who are also watching Hollywood movies. There is also another Hollywood series and film John Wick. In John Wick, if you will see Keanu Reeves committing murder, the way he murders, we will see him. So the USP is that it is absolutely killing, meaning once he starts killing, I think he doesn't stop below 1520 and its fourth season has come, now John Wick is being liked a lot because India Korean cine

ma is a big hit in India. It is a big hit among our youth. South Korean cinema is a big hit among our youth. South Korean cinema has a population of 5 crores. Among the 5 crores population of Korea, a company like LG is from Korea. The song they had made big is being consumed. The hit Gangnam dance is all from Korea. Anyway, my point is that India should now create that kind of content which can be consumed even in foreign countries. Our director Sandeep Reddy Wanga is of that quality and that l

evel director Kantara Kantara. There was a lot of opposition to Kantara, what happened is that Indian films have also come a long way but there has also been a change in the world's perspective along with it, earlier the audience from the West used to think that this film is How does the song start, what is this, how is this possible, today they are seeing that no, films are not made only on the basis of logic, films are made for the sake of entertainment, so the world has accepted the Indian po

int of view in it. One thing has been added in this that the diversity of Indian culture i.e. there are so many festivals here, now he writes to those people that a festival of colors is celebrated here, a festival of light is celebrated, there is also a festival between brother and sister. There is a festival for brother and sister which is not found anywhere in the world and so much variety, so many ways to worship the same god, so many gods and so many ways to worship the same god, Diwali is

also different in Maharashtra and Kerala. There is something different in India and something different in Madhya Pradesh but the feeling is the same, all these things have become so popular, so now all these things are also seen by the world audience and even by these Pakistanis, you just talked about YouTubers. These people were looking for it. Well, the Pakistanis have made a very interesting comment on what you are saying. I remembered it. I said, I will mention it. They said that Suryavansh

am, we are traveling in the buses here at 35, 40, 40. He said, almost every Pakistani has at least seen Suryavansh here, it is not like the set Max comes here, yes, this is the diversity, now the audience of Hollywood and the audience of Europe also want to see this diversity. There has been a change here, especially after the film Kantara, that India should definitely go to the core and extract stories and analyze the society and traditions and include the experiences and trends of world cinema

in it. The director of our place has also started making it with the thought that our green work should appeal to the audience of the world as well. I believe that in the future, our cinema is going to create a stir in the world. The good thing is that these new generation directors, whether it is Vanga ji or the directors of Hamare Ka Tara, these people are showing India as it is, its culture, yes, they are not showing it through the lens of Bollywood people or us pundits. Whatever you are, yo

u will always remain a scoundrel, Hindu, whatever you are, now the taboo of Kalpetta is breaking and people are now talking openly and I also think that there is one more thing which seems that now you are different from what you are in the society. Now you can't post yes because hesitations have also broken down and people's information has also increased a lot and the exposure has become huge, it has become a thousand times more than before. So many things are being seen in the world, so now t

his change has to be seen. Film Review Are these woke liberals, now they will not be able to stop them, they are Americans [Music] youtube0 Meat, he liked the music of this film very much, the music of this film is fast, he liked it very much, we are the world cinema, we are watching it with hope. And this is what he wants that after RRR, bring more brother, sell your goods which are being prepared to us, but there is a whole class in our country which is concerned whether no no no no, if you ha

ve seen this film, then what is your life? It is useless that we are talking about this film because why is it being opposed? And instead of opposing the Indianness that is there in it and the qualities that it has, yes, they are opposing it indirectly but in the guise of violence and protesting against it. They want to but their objective is that if overall the film suffers financial loss then such directors will get discouraged. Their intention is that it should not become a trend. Yes, anothe

r Sandeep Reddy Vanga should not be born. But apart from that, if we technically talk about the film and story structure, then even after so many murders, the police do not come anywhere in the film. I mean, no effort was made anywhere in the film, like they reach Bobby Deval from abroad and directly They entered his house, created a massacre and Bobby Deval disappeared, but the girl had already informed him that brother, he was also making a body double, which I said, he was leaving a lot of lo

op holes. To make a part two because you must have seen that part in the post credits, the post credit part felt a bit strange to me, it disturbs the flow of the film, in the end I also felt the same, that means in the end, we are a little bit of that taste. They come out together saying that man, this bloody mule has been done absolutely yes. What was not there in the entire film, he came in the end, in an attempt to create an atmosphere for the next film. I think it will work a little, a littl

e more, it will work more, but I think that He did not even make the film from this point of view, it was made for entertainment, in which he tied the film to the visuals and music. Hum, there is not much logic there, so many such films are made in the world which are based on logic. But it doesn't happen, this is also the same kind of film and most of the audience wants to see such films. Once I saw a statement of Amitabh Bachchan on a very old video that someone asked that our films are far fr

om the truth. To us, they said, look, there is a lot of poverty in our country, so why would people go to the theater to see the same misery? Let's go, it happened at that time. What is the second thing that now the audience we have here, the audience understands this whole thing. understands It's a movie so we're going to watch the movie and then you don't know what things are appealing to you, some you understand, some you can't explain, you understand emotionally, it's that kind of thing. Thi

s is a complete production, if you can enjoy even 6070 80 rupees from one film then it is worth the money, it is worth the money. Now if we sit down to review each scene, then something like this comes out in every film. Yes, I am. And Prashant ji, we are also trying to promote Indianness in films by forming Mahakaushal Film Development Committee here in Jabalpur and have organized two short film festivals and this committee is related to Indian film practice. And currently in February, a nation

al level film festival is being organized in Panchkula and its objective is to promote Indianness in films and we often used to brainstorm on when will Indianness come in the main stream cinema, so I think That Kantara has come, Animal has come, Animal has proved a new experiment that mix Indianness in the spice of Bollywood and mix it with violence, romance, action and fast pace movie and it will be liked by the new generation and all the leftists. They will keep tearing their throats even if t

heir reviews get one crore two crore views but they will not be able to do anything for them. The film will come with profit and its part two will also come. Yes, I think this country needs more directors like Sandeep Reddy Vanga. There is a need to serve Indianness and now I am watching this film, even in countries like America, they are liking it, that is, to establish the national Indianness that is the internet, we need more directors like Sandeep, which is an old line. People have also seen

her in their old days and in their school and college days, you will vacate the throne, people come, now we are seeing this in every sector of the society and even in films, yes in politics, you are seeing this, you will vacate the throne. People come, keep writing, you do something, if you do not gauge the pulse of the society and try to mix it, you will be rejected. This message is coming out everywhere, I think. So, how did you guys like this whole talk? Comment. But do write, this is the fi

rst video of this channel and I would request Prashant ji to do the next review also. On top of Sham Bahadur, I have also seen Sham Bahadur yesterday and whether you have seen it or not, I have seen it till now, so I felt that even beyond that. There is a need to talk, what are your thoughts beyond that, what time did Meghna Gulzar include in it, what else did Meghna Gulzar leave and why did she leave, some very important pages of history are missing in it, some important pages have come, some h

ave not come, some If he has not come, then there was some compulsion on his part or perhaps his way of storytelling is this. Beyond that, we will also record an episode. This is a very big economy in India. It supports the economy. Many artistes and technicians are able to survive through it. May this industry continue to flourish like this and keep making good films. It is our best wish for the Mumbai film industry or for Indian cinema at all and the outlook of the Indian audience is also expa

nding. Yes, this is a very good thing, this is the biggest thing. I am seeing that it is coming out and the filmmakers are having to incorporate it in their films. Yes, this is new, so see you again in the next review, Ram Ram, Ram Ram to all of you.