Main

Compare and average multi-point responses - ODEON tutorial

***Press 'C' for subtitles. Para Español, active subtítulos y vaya a los ajustes.*** The Compare and Average tool allows you to display the results from various multi-point jobs at the same time for comparison, as well as calculate averages across jobs and receivers. You can even compare responses from different models! Learn more about ODEON and download the free trial at our website: http://odeon.dk 0:00 Intro 1:09 Opening Compare and Average window 1:30 3D Receivers & Case List tabs 2:06 Energy parameter bars 3:21 Editing legends 4:30 Energy Parameters tab 5:02 Compare jobs with drag & drop 5:32 Comparing 2 models 6:57 Comparing multiple models 7:40 Outro ODEON is a software for simulation and measurements of room acoustics, and is the preferred software by acoustic engineers and architectural consultancy firms. You can model sound sources ranging from point sources with directivities to large industrial machines, visualize acoustics with ray tracing, billiard balls, and color grids, and even listen to the simulated acoustics in your room with auralisations. ODEON is the optimum acoustic design tool when working with concert hall and auditorium acoustics, industrial and restaurant noise, and PA system design. The video tutorials in this channel will explain the basics of room acoustics analysis using ODEON.

ODEON Room Acoustics Software

6 days ago

Hello! This is Mario from ODEON. In this video, we will talk about  the Compare and Average tool, which was introduced in ODEON 18. The compare and average tool allows you  to load various multi-point responses in a single interface. This allows you to see the results  from different jobs side to side. And it will also calculate statistics,  such as averages and standard deviations, for the loaded multi-point responses. With this tool you can, for example, study the influence of different source
  positions at the same receiver positions. You can also average room acoustic parameters calculated with multiple source positions, as recommended by international  standards such as ISO 3382. The compare and average tool even allows  you to compare jobs from different models. So, if you have two models where materials or geometries  were modified on one of them, you can showcase the effect of these changes. You can even compare 2  completely unrelated models. There are various ways to access t
his tool. The simplest is to go to the Job list, and click on this icon. This will compare and average all  currently calculated multi-point responses. Here you have the 3D Receivers tab. In this tab, you can select  and save receiver groups, in the same way as normal multi-point responses. This is explained in our video on  multi & single point responses. Next is the Case List tab. This will list all multi-point responses  loaded into the compare & average tool, with their properties in differe
nt columns. If you wish to exclude some jobs from the results, you can disable them by  unticking these checkboxes. You can then see the results in  the energy parameter bars tabs. Just like in a normal point response, the first one shows the frequency  dependent parameters per octave band. Each color corresponds to a different job. Right now, each bar shows the  average of all receivers in that job. The black line then shows the average  of all jobs at that octave band. However, you can scroll
through  receivers with R and Shift+R. And as usual across the software, you can scroll through parameters  with the left and right arrows. The second energy parameter bars  tab shows the broadband parameters. Here, the results are shown at  individual receivers by default. The black dotted line is the average of  all jobs at a single receiver position. While the solid black line is the average  across all jobs and all receiver positions. The legends for the jobs can be  customized back in the C
ase List tab. You can manually change the legends by double clicking on any row  under the “Edit legend” column. You can also copy different  properties of the jobs into the legend with the buttons at the bottom of the window. You can apply this to the currently selected row, or to all rows by ticking this checkbox. Now, let’s go to the receiver statistics tab. This shows the average, minimum, maximum,  and standard deviation for all results. Remember that these statistics are not  only across r
eceivers but also across jobs. Finally, we have the Energy Parameters tab. This shows the results  numerically arranged in tables. You can scroll down for  different groupings of data, or skip to different sections with these buttons. You can also compare and average two jobs by dragging and dropping a calculated  multi-point response into another. This even works across two different ODEON models, allowing you to compare  results between the two models. To do this, you will need to open a  sepa
rate ODEON window, by going to File, then “Open another instance of ODEON”. Then, open the 2nd model in the second window. Finally, drag and drop a job  from one model into the other. However, receiver-specific  results will only be available if the two models have  receivers at the same positions. If you have different receiver  positions between the two models, some displays will be unavailable. For example, you will be unable  to define receiver groups, since there are no common  receivers be
tween the two models. And results in the energy parameter  bars and energy parameter tables will all be averages across all receivers, without the possibility of looking  at results at specific receivers. To make sure you have the same  receiver positions between models, you can either make a copy of the  model and edit the second model, or you can export the source/receiver script, which we explain in our tutorial on sources. You can also compare more than 2 models at a time. Simply open yet an
other model, and drag and drop the multi-point response  into the compare and average window. By default, ODEON comes with 11 European  Concert Hall models grouped in a folder. So, we can try to make a  comparison of all 11 concert halls. With that, we conclude this tutorial, and  we hope you have found it useful. Good luck!

Comments