You can support this channel on Patreon! Link below
RCA's attempt at creating a new color television standard that would be compatible with existing black and white TVs initially faced technical challenges. However, it was an obviously great idea from a backward compatibility standpoint, and the National Television Systems Committee latched onto this idea and helped to propel RCA's idea to the real world. This is that story.
This channel is made possible through supporters on Patreon. These supporters have allowed me to go part time from my day job and keep these videos coming more frequently. If you're interested in helping out, please check out my Patreon page. Thanks for your consideration!
https://www.patreon.com/technologyconnections
Research for this video revealed many great resources. I've linked many down below for those interested.
http://www.earlytelevision.org/
This website has a tremendous amount of information, pictures, and resources available on the history of color TV. They're definitely worth checking out, and apparently you can visit the museum if you're in their area. From this website, this story about the early color systems is great:
http://www.earlytelevision.org/color_tv_cooper.html
This link also includes fantastic information on the CBS color wheel system:
http://www.earlytelevision.org/cbs_color_system.html
Information on NTSC encoding was supplemented from this overview on color details:
http://nemesis.lonestar.org/reference/internet/web/color/ntsc_primer.html
Basics for many encoding techniques were gathered from everyone's favorite reliable source of knowledge. Some good reads:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrature_amplitude_modulation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTSC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorburst
Thank you to all of my current Patrons!
Tommi Hares, Alex Smith, Dakota Williams, Eitan Tal, Quinton Wilson, Jeremy DeGuzman, Sean Spark, Lucas Hartbarger, Taylor Cuzela, twiglet, David Lastres, Granger Meador, Jeremy Kitchen, Jason Wellband, Shane Belaire, Paul Emmerich, Sam Hodge, Matthew Rossi, Paul Craigie, Paul Williams, Lukas Komischke, Dave Anderson, Felix Freiberger, Dane Peterson, Brent LaRowe, Aerospyke, Kieran Cox, Hunter Schwisow, wsh, Logan Kriete, Rafał Wiosna, Adam D. Ruppe, Audin Malmin, Eric Hansen, Noah McCann, Jason R Scheuren, Rufo Sanchez, Aaron Herbst, Bjørn Vegar Torseth, Yaniv, Teague Chrystie, Matt Falcon, Kevin Landrigan, Evan Papp, Jason Weathered, KrzysFR, Sage, Ma rie, Jolyan g shaba, Stephen Youndt, Stephen Bell, Steven First, Howard Longden, Gianluca D'Orazio, Martin Granestrand, Martin Hansen, Nicolas de Cosson, PaulKT, Mahner, Edwin Öster, Nathan Weetman, Bruce Williams, Matt Harrison, James Ryan, Steven Crowson, Anthonio Pettit, Paul Ziegler, Stephen Furness, Joseph, Marty Connor, Wesley Van Pelt, Lorenzo Novara, Lee Lemoine, John Trevick, Elliot King, Paul Anderson, Gustaf Lindblad, Carl Yazbek, Nicholas, Matthew, Daniel Mann, Harald E. Westlie, Daniel Newton, urbanhusky, Henri Hyyryläinen, James Holmes, Neil Hopwood, Duncan Middleton, Conor Killeen, Tyler Knott, Slone Fallion, seagull, Athanasios Kountouras, Sarah Symon, Francis Fisher, Tab Patterson, Philipp Thomasberger, Gustavo Carballeira, SkydiveWeee, Tyler, Nolan Johnson, Samuel Kadolph, Robert Toth, Matthew Giraitis, Ellis M. Eisen, Lorenzo Stanco, Michael Shick, Thomas Jew, Eric Wood, Joe Bond, Eidorian, Nikolaj Sørensen, Jesper Hansen, John Kesson, cpb, Anonymous49856739245764, Jason Ganiatsas, U.H., Gabriel Frâncu, Nathan Casteel, Steven Willis, Marinus Swanepoel, Kedar Deshpande, Neema Mostafavi, Gerald Monaco, Piotr Mardziel, Randall Gaz, Dennis Mossler, Steven Hidy, Boris, h.drew foy, Bill Basch
If I’ve missed you, please shoot me a message! You all deserve credit, and Patreon isn’t great at just giving you lists...
How do you take an existing technological
standard, and make it do three times as much “stuff”, all the while without really
changing it? This was the task given to RCA in developing
their compatible color television system. A black and white television set need only
know how bright part of an image is, but a color television needs to know how much red
is in an image, how much green, and how much blue. These three combined images will appear in
full color, but any one of them on their own wouldn
’t look right on a black and white
television. And RCA didn’t have more bandwidth at their
disposal as the standards had already been established for black and white TV. They couldn’t just send three discrete images
even if they wanted to. So they needed to take the existing television
signal, and somehow add more information to it, and still make it compatible with existing
black and white televisions. RCA was working towards a color television
system that could do just that. They had gotten th
e fundamentals figured out
on their compatible color system, and were competing with CBS’s field-sequential color
wheel system for FCC approval in 1950. You can learn more about that system in the
previous video. RCA’s system was based on the 1938 work
of Georges Valensi of France. The National Television Systems Committee,
or NTSC, chose RCA’s system as their standard, and they lobbied hard for its approval. To recap, the CBS system used a conventional
black and white picture tube and camera. B
oth of which were fitted with a spinning
wheel in front of them. The wheel contained repeating sections tinted
red, green, and blue. If you show each color sequentially and do
it fast enough, persistence of vision will kick in prevent you from noticing. Synchronize the discs between camera and receiver
and you’ll get a full color image. But to be convincing, the color wheel has
to spin very fast. CBS increased the field rate from the standard
60 hz to 144 hz, allowing the complete R-G-B image to
be seen 48 times per second. But in doing so, they threw out any possibility
of being compatible with existing televisions. RCA, meanwhile, was using a new type of picture
tube which contained a repeating pattern of red, green, and blue phosphor dots in front
of a shadow mask, which worked in conjunction with three separate electron guns in the tube
to simultaneously show a red, green, and blue image in one device. These groupings are not in any way discrete
pixels, which I feel bears repeating
from my last video. They simply serve as a regular pattern with
which the shadow mask can prevent the electron guns from hitting the wrong color. This new shadow mask picture tube was the
key to compatibility. If all three electron guns ran at the same
intensity relative to each other it would function exactly the same as an ordinary black
and white television, making an image using a repeating pattern of horizontal lines. But if you control them independently, the
picture tube can now make a f
ull color image on its own, while still building the image
in fundamentally the same fashion as a standard television. However, RCA’s color system required a more
complicated camera with three separate video tubes, each of which was behind a filter to
provide it only with red, green, or blue light. The three separate image components provided
by the tubes were combined and encoded in such a way that the transmitted signal appears
to be a black and white transmission. A black and white TV would d
isplay a perfectly
acceptable image from these transmissions. But a color television set could recover the
color information from the camera using some clever tricks. Now, I’m going to do my best at describing
how NTSC color is encoded. It’s very technical and hertz to think too
much about, so I’m going to tell you some basic info and do my best to explain how it
allows the TV to form a color image from an apparently black and white transmission. The beauty of NTSC color was how it dealt
with th
e outputs of the three separate camera tubes. Instead of deal with them directly in an RGB
encoding scheme, the outputs from the tubes were used to create two separate intermediary
signal components: luminance, a brightness component, and chrominance, a separate color
component. The luminance part of the signal was created
by adding together the red, green, and blue channels from the camera. This would be compatible with existing black
and white televisions, as it was simply a measure of overall
brightness. The most genius part of NTSC color was that
the chrominance component was almost completely hidden using some clever encoding methods. No extra bandwidth was required because by
using a little math, a color television can derive the chrominance component from within
the luminance component itself. So first, some methodology. The luminance signal is created by adding
together the the R, G, and B components from the camera in this ratio. Luminance is referred to as Y. Chrominance is c
onveyed as two signals, I
and Q. I is created by taking 60 percent of the Red signal, subtracting 28 percent of
the Green signal, and further subtracting 32 percent of the Blue signal. Q is created by taking 21% of the red signal,
subtracting 52% of the green, and then adding 31% of the blue. Yes this is all confusing and I don’t even
want to try and work out how these ratios fit into each other but the fact of the matter
is so long as the TV set can see I and Q, it can bring back the original R
GB values
seen in the camera by applying a bit of analog algebra to the known luminance, that’s Y. With I and Q signals, a television can use
the same ratios the camera did to produce I, Y, and Q to bring back R, G, and B, and
it will then be able to adjust the output of the three electron beams in order to follow
the original RGB ratios the camera picked up. If the television doesn’t see I and Q, it
will simply fire all three electron guns with the same intensity to produce only black and
white
. Now for the REALLY complicated bit. You might have asked where I and Q are coming
from. He keeps talking about these apparently nonexistent
values! What is he going on about?! Well, I and Q are hidden within the luminance
component. Using a process called QAM, or quadrature
amplitude modulation, the luminance component can serve as a vessel for I and Q. To actually
extract them, the luminance carrier is multiplied by a 3.579545 MHz reference signal. The phase of this signal is used in determin
ing
the hue of the color, so it was critical that the television receive a perfectly timed reference
of this frequency from the transmission itself, otherwise the hue would be all wrong. Just before each line, in the back porch as
it’s called, is the colorburst. This is a brief transmission of that carrier. The television set’s own crystal oscillator
will lock onto and synchronize with the carrier to ensure the colors are decoded correctly. The colorburst doesn’t actually include
any color infor
mation, but it’s vital to the television’s ability to correctly extract
the color. If the television sees the color burst, it
will begin demodulating the I and Q signals with the help of that crystal oscillator,
now in a phase-locked loop with the colorburst. Actually, this is easier to explain in graph
form. A black and white television signal looks
like this. These low points are the horizontal blanking
intervals between the lines, and this squiggly bit is the part you see. The brief section b
etween the blanking interval
and the start of the visible portion is called the back porch. Along the visible portion, the higher the
line goes, the brighter the image is drawn on the screen. Remember, the image is made of lines, which
can you learn more about, here. Now, a color transmission looks nearly exactly
the same, but this little squiggle, the colorburst, is tucked in just before the line in the back
porch. This colorburst is simply the carrier that
I and Q are modulated on. The carrier
is suppressed during transmission
except for during the colorburst, which eliminates most of the interference between the chrominance
and luminance signals, allowing a black and white television to display the image. A color TV, though, will use this colorburst
to synchronize its own crystal oscillator. Once it’s locked on, the television set’s
oscillator will recreate the carrier. Imagine the colorburst continuing on throughout
the entire process. The TV will then use its own generated carrier
to complete the task of demodulating the color. As the three electron beams fly along the
face of the tube, the circuitry multiplies both the sine and the cosine of the carrier
wave with the luminance value, which will now provide the I and Q values. Then the derived I and Q values, along with
the original Y value are passed through a matrix circuit applying the ratios we learned
earlier, which will then spit out the original RGB values encoded by the camera. With this recovered, we finally hav
e the ability
to mix the three electron guns separately into a coherent RGB output. Now, limited bandwidth meant that the resolution
of the chrominance component is not as high as the luminance. In effect, the picture is still mostly monochrome
but with gobs of loosely-applied coloring thrown on top. Think of it as the ratio of the three electron
beams--thus the apparent color--being locked in by the color signal over large chunks of
the line, but still with the ability to in unison change inten
sity, and thus brightness,
along with the luminance signal. We’re much more sensitive to changes in
brightness than in color, so the image would seem completely natural. In fact, many digital formats such as MPEG-2
exploit our eye’s poor color detection in a similar way, dedicating more data to brightness
than color to allow for compression. Anyway, I’m really not going to elaborate
further on QAM because oh my goodness there’s a lot of math involved but if you’re intrigued
I cordially invite yo
u to visit some links down below. But to finish our story we started with the
last video, when the FCC had given the go-ahead for CBS’s color wheel system in 1950, RCA’s
color wasn’t working too well. In fact at the beginning of the “competition”,
they were still pursuing a three tube optical system, but they were investing heavily in
their replacement system using a shadow mask CRT. Regardless, the image quality from the CBS
system was far superior to what RCA and others could muster at the tim
e with their early
shadow mask offerings. RCA fought very hard to get approval for their
system, but it didn’t come. But two things happened to make sure they
would eventually succeed. First was the reformation of the NTSC. The National Television Systems Committee
created the original black and white television specifications, and having seen RCA’s work
on a compatible color system coming down the pipeline, they got back together and worked
hard to try and get the FCC to approve this new system
. This very much annoyed the FCC because they
had already given permission to CBS to proceed. However, the Korean War threw CBS’s plans
under the bus. The National Production Authority declared
that color television production must cease on November 20th, 1951--exactly one year after
permission was granted to begin color broadcasts. And in the meantime, the NTSC and RCA remained
hard at work improving their new compatible color system. By 1953, the shadow mask CRT was sufficiently
developed and
was producing excellent results, and funny enough it was one of CBS’s subsidiaries
that made the first breakthrough. It became obvious that CBS’s sequential
color wheel system didn’t make any sense whatsoever if compatible color was producing
similar results. In March of 1953, CBS testified before congress
that they were abandoning their color TV efforts, afterwhich time the ban on producing color
televisions was lifted. The NTSC restarted their efforts for FCC approval,
and it was granted to th
em on December 17th, 1953. The first nationwide color transmission of
the new compatible system occurred on January 1, 1954, a broadcast of that year’s Tournament
of Roses parade. In the US, color TV wouldn’t really take
off for about 10 years. Early color sets were insanely expensive,
costing about as much as a new car, and their vacuum tube electronics were very finicky. These color TVs required lots of patience. Though it’s amazing to me that this amount
of complexity could even be achieved w
ith 1950s technology. But the fact was, most TV programming was
still in black and white. It wasn’t until 1965 that the majority of
TV broadcasts were in color. Until that point, owning a color TV was a
luxury that only rarely saw its true value. It wouldn’t be until 1972 that color TVs
outsold black and white units in the US. And now, some odds and ends. Actually, later, some odds and ends. I hate to do this, but I’ve found over 10
minutes of stuff that I want to talk about. I’m sorry, this was
supposed to be two parts,
but it’s getting longer still. In the next video, I’ll touch on the differences
between NTSC and PAL, we’ll go over chroma dots and color restoration, Guillermo Gonzalez
Camarena’s dubious invention, the 29.97 frames per second nonsense we deal with here
in the States, and more. Thanks for watching, and thanks for putting
up with another cliffhanger. If you like this sort of video and are new
to the channel, why not subscribe? I’d also like to thank all of my Patreon
s
upports for keeping this channel possible, especial these folks who get their name in
lights. You can support this channel and help keep
these videos coming more frequently. Patreon Supporters have allowed me to focus
on the channel to a much greater extent. If you’re interested in helping out, please
check out my Patreon Page through the link on your screen or down below in the description. Thank you for your consideration, and I’ll
see you next time!
Comments
Then RCA decided that vinyl was a good format for movies too and wasted about 17 years on that, ultimately bankrupting the company.
5:05 ... "That's Y" ... possibly the most complicated build-up to a pun ever.
No music, no intro, a true champ. Doesn't need any hype to be excellent :)
NTSC - Color PAL - Colour
6:36 Probably good to mention by this point that “I” stood for “in-phase” and “Q” for “quadrature”. That is, these were the 0° and 90° components extracted from the phase-modulated chrominance signal. If you think of this signal as a point moving in two dimensions, the direction of the point from the centre gives you the hue, and the distance from the centre is the saturation of the colour.
"I'm sorry, this was only supposed to be two parts." No need to apologize for giving us yet more fantastic content. :)
Don't forget the system used by your Cold War rival: SECAM. Interesting fact about SECAM and PAL: The brightness parts are mutually-decodable, but the colour is not. In divided Berlin, the West used PAL and the East used SECAM and both sides would tune into each other's transmissions in black and white and their own in colour.
6:53 Actually you’ve got it upside down; higher signal levels correspond to lower luminance levels (darker), while lower levels are higher (lighter). It was done this way so that transients caused by interference would random dark dots instead of random light dots, and the former were considered to be less noticeable.
I was four in 1964 when we had an old Admiral black and white TV and our neighbor got a color TV. I remember watching Popeye cartoons on their TV and really appreciating the color, and then watching on our black and white at home and still IMAGINING what all the colors were from what I had seen next door. Good videos! Definitely, yours is one of the two or three best channels on the -tube!
I'm so old I remember the bad old days of early NTSC. When I was a kid, we had an older NTSC TV that was always causing problems. The "vertical hold" would constantly unlock and cause the picture to scroll continuously. If you couldn't fix it by adjusting the vertical hold knob, then sometimes banging on the side of the TV would work. The color was usually bad, so you had to constantly adjust the tint knob. When things got really bad, you'd open up the back of the TV, unplug all the tubes, and then take them down to the drugstore where they had a tube testing machine with a bunch of sockets on top. You'd take your tubes one at a time, plug it into the right socket, and a meter would tell you if the tube was still good or not. You'd buy replacements for the bad tubes, then take everything back home, plug them back in, and hope it worked better.
Interesting to think of a color TV set as an analog computer. Those boys were brilliant in those days. Did so much with so little! The car automatic transmission was also an analog computer. Great stuff!
Ha! It hertz to talk about it.
The stuff that was done with analog signals is nothing short of amazing.
Some people were just born to teach. I've learned a LOT from this guy
He addressed this lightly in a later video, but for those curious about QAM, there’s one crucial aspect that was left out. The signal has to kinda squiggle around in order to get a phase offset from the colorburst. The squiggling around of the very top of the signal will be enough for a color television to determine the phase offset but not enough that it’ll bother a black and white television. Furthermore, it’ll apply a sin function and a cosine function to that phase offset in order to determine I and Q respectively. The sin function is called “in phase” and the cos function is called “in quadrature” as a cosine wave is 90° out of phase with a sine wave. That’s how modern QAM works to this day. If I got anything wrong, feel free to correct me. This is just my best interpretation from reading websites and watching videos on QAM
In many color sets, the final dematrixing was done in the picture tube itself. The luminance signal would be sent to the cathodes, and the color difference signals to the grids (or, the other way around) and the CRT would do the final multiplication as well as displaying the result. The cleverness displayed in those color sets was amazing.
My family got our first color set around 1968 or 69. My Mom bought it and had it put in without telling anyone. I came home from school one day, walked by the usual TV viewing area, and was completely speechless at the sight of a color TV. I got my first personal TV as a Christmas present at age 13-ish, a 13-inch diagonal black and white set. I didn't own a color set myself until I was 21 or 22 - it was my college graduation present.
This is the best concise explanation of color TV that I've come across to date. Attempting to explain QAM is a tall order and you nailed it! By the end of high school I understood how black & white TV worked. Then in college I worked at a TV master control production center with racks of tape machines, TBCs, waveform monitors and vectorscopes, and it took me until the end of college to finally understand how color TV worked! It all comes down to math, algebra, physics, the manipulation of electrons. The more you study it, the more you realize how scientifically beautiful it is ....if you don't hurt your head trying! It's like a dream that it works!
fun fact: the field-sequential color system did find use in the later moon landings, although it ran at the standard 525/29.97 rate and was converted from field-sequential to standard NTSC once received on Earth.
Regarding the Y, I, and Q ratios: I instantly recognize the "Y" ratios as the relative sensitivity of the rod cells in the human retina to different colors of light, which determines how we expect greyscale images to look. From what I can tell, the "I" value determines the skewing of the color towards orange or cyan, which allows for Y+I to form a 2-color TV signal. The "Q" value further skews the "I" signal to allow for magenta and lime-green colors, and by combining magenta (red + blue) , orange (2 parts red + 1 part green), lime-green (1 part red + 2 parts green), and cyan (green + blue), you can get the full spectrum that humans can see. Yes, green is heavily referenced, but that's because human eyes are primarily sensitive to green light, with red and blue only providing color, not providing the majority of image detail.