Main

Eastern Front Tank Warfare 1944 - WW2 Documentary Special

In this conflict, we’ve seen armored warfare on a greater scale than anything before or since. Indy takes a look at some of the tanks slugging it out on the Eastern Front, from the long-serving Panzer III and IV, to the newer and more powerful Tiger and T-34 85, and the monstrous IS-2. Join us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/TimeGhostHistory Or join the TimeGhost Army directly at: https://timeghost.tv/signup/ Check out our TimeGhost History YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/timeghost Between 2 Wars: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrG5J-K5AYAU1R-HeWSfY2D1jy_sEssNG Follow WW2 Day by Day on Instagram: @ww2_day_by_day Follow TimeGhost History on Instagram: @timeghosthistory Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TimeGhostHistory/ Hosted by:Indy Neidel Director: Astrid Deinhard Producers: Astrid Deinhard and Spartacus Olsson Executive Producers: Astrid Deinhard, Indy Neidell, Spartacus Olsson Creative Producer: Marek Kamiński Community Management: Ian Sowden Written by: Markus Linke, Indy Neidel Research by: Markus Linke Map animations by: Daniel Weiss Map research by: Sietse Kenter Edited by: Karolina Dołęga Artwork and color grading by: Mikołaj Uchman Sound design by: Marek Kamiński Colorizations by: Mikołaj Uchman Source literature list: http://bit.ly/WW2sources Archive footage: Screenocean/Reuters - https://www.screenocean.com Image sources: Bundesarchiv Narodowe Narchiwum Cyfrowe Imperial War Museums: P 233, CL 2557 SA-kuva 155186 RIA Novosti National Archives NARA Not Less O rEqual from Wikimedia Soundtracks from Epidemic Sound: Break Free - Fabien Tell Dark Beginning - Johan Hynynen Imperious - Bonnie Grace It's Not a Game - Philip Ayers Last Man Standing 3 - Johannes Bornlöf Last Point of Safe Return - Fabien Tell March Of The Brave 10 - Rannar Sillard Other Sides of Glory - Fabien Tell Rememberance - Fabien Tell Weapon of Choice - Fabien Tell A TimeGhost chronological documentary produced by OnLion Entertainment GmbH.

World War Two

4 months ago

It was in 1943 and 1944 when Tank Warfare reached its peak. Not just in this war but in military history as whole. Never before and never again would armored fighting vehicles engage each other on such a large scale, with such ferocious energy. On the Eastern Front, both the German and Soviet tank leaders prepare their arsenals, for better or worse, for the final ride to determine the outcome of this war. I’m Indy Neidell; this is a WW2 in Real Time Special about the state of tank warfare on the
Eastern Front here near the end of 1944. I’ll look at the German side first. The Wehrmacht of 1944 finds itself in a critical position, with only 15 combat ready Panzer Divisions operating on the Eastern Front. And even those 15 have been drastically reduced in strength, both in personnel and equipment, which has led to a significant decrease in overall effectiveness. Efficiency… sorry. The heavy fighting in 1943 at Kursk, Rzhev, and in Ukraine has sabotaged their ability for any kind of real o
ffensive operations. Many Panzer Divisions are down to 40 or 50% of their authorized strength, and some are as low as 25%. On paper, a Panzer division is to be outfitted with 170 tanks, but the average is only 60, so the overall goal to revitalize the German Heer with tanks has failed miserably. The appointment of Heinz Guderian as the inspector of the Panzers in order to restore combat efficiency across the board, kinda went down in flames, as inter service rivalries, bureaucratic infighting, a
nd a complete lack of backing by Hitler’s inner circle made it impossible. And the long awaited, much anticipated strategic reserve - which every General worth his salt lobbied for - never materialized. To prevent the disaster that looms on the horizon, two steps have been taken to keep the Panzers alive. The first revolves around upgrading the extant medium tanks with long-barreled guns, better sights and electronics, and other technical improvements. The Panzer III is ancient by now, yet still
in service with its L and M versions now outfitted with 5cm guns. The current Panzer IV version G fares not so much better, although its 7.5cm gun is more than capable of taking on its equivalent in the field at typical battlefield range, but it is really the inner workings that show their age. Additional armor-plates can be bolted on, sure, but the already underpowered Maybach HL 120 gasoline engine is at its limits in terms of mobility. The engine only gives 300hp, whereas the Soviet V-2 dies
el engine inside the T-34 easily goes up to 500. Same goes for the suspension. Both the Panzer III’s torsion bar, as well as the Panzer IV’s leaf-spring suspension are outclassed by the T-34’s Christie suspension, especially over the terrain conditions of eastern Europe. These technical issues have led to the German panzers losing their edge in speed and mobility. Remember, the German mobile doctrines of “Blitzkrieg” rely on superior mobility, not armor or firepower. The second step is innovatio
n. The new generation of medium tanks begins with the launch of the Panzer V Panther. Although entering mass-production in early 1943, the Panther is rushed out with many technical flaws and problems. Most have been ironed out by 1944 with the Panther Version A, yet faulty components such as fuel pump malfunctions still happen. Overall, the Panther is excellent when it comes down to sophisticated sights, fire control elements, and gun stability, yet the numbers of them are just not there to make
the desired impact. Then there are the new heavy tank regiments with the Tiger I, for controlling the battlefield or breaking through enemy positions with shock and unstoppable force. The Tiger is objectively the best tank in this theater in 1943. Its frontal armor is basically impenetrable and the 88mm gun makes short work of enemy opposition. However, major drawbacks comes with the immense production cost, maintenance problems, and an overall technical unreliability. Sure, superior gunnery an
d armor are excellent features, but this naturally leads to an excess in weight. Being over 44 tons means that crossing wooden bridges or getting salvaged from a ditch are almost impossible tasks at times. Even worse, the Tiger- and the Panther- are both fuel hogs, consuming double the fuel of the Panzer III for the same range. The Panzers have been driving hand to mouth already as it is, as consumption of fuel exceeds its production in seven out of twelve months. Tiger and Panther also further
complicate the distribution of spare parts. They do not share the same engines, transmissions, or armaments like the Panzer III or IV, so they have to build up a whole new stock of their own. They do not even use the same road wheels and tracks so German factories are again pretty divided on what they produce because of a lack of standardization. And by 1944, the Reich’s industries universally lack steel, copper, rubber, and other war materials. So what good is it that German scientists develop
a deadly high velocity armor piercing round with a tungsten carbide core, if tungsten carbide is barely available? Adding to the supply problems are the Allied bombing runs on the plants of MAN, Henschel, and Krupp, as well as disrupting the sub-component manufacturers in the Ruhr, and this only decreases the output. Tanks with damage beyond local level maintenance must send back to Germany for parts and repairs, so they are often months away from their units in the field. This leads to- by many
accounts- cannibalization and an overall degradation in quality, eating away at the combat power of the Panzer Divisions. Same goes for the crews, by the way, which are now mostly composed of exhausted veterans or inexperienced newcomers. So it is not surprising that an increased focus has been put on cheaper alternatives, like the turretless Assault Guns and Panzerjäger. The self propelled Panzerjäger Marder III with a 7.5 cm Pak 40 is a cheap version of a tank destroyer, yet is heavily relied
on by the infantry. Also the Assault Guns, the Stug III and IV. Although technically not a tank, the Stug III is the predominant armored vehicle of the Wehrmacht in 1944. Armed with the same 7.5cm gun as the Panzer IV, it is often called the “infantry tank”. The upgraded Sturm-howitzer with a 10.5cm gun is also more and more in use to counter Soviet tanks. All this means that the Panzer Divisions of the Army do not get a chance to revitalize. More and more their ability to hold a continuous lin
e of defense shrinks, and break-ins are not just common but became expected. Each sector of the front uses its armored divisions more and more as “fire brigades”- mobile counterstrike units that the infantry calls upon to deal with enemy break-ins. This ad-hoc “Kampfgruppen”ability is still a real strength in the German tactical arsenal, but it means that it is impossible to concentrate armor into large forces like before, and this defensive strategy only further dilutes strength. As for the Sov
iets, their Tank armies suffered badly during the first years of the war and even in 1943 had some serious defeats handed to them. Nonetheless, the Wehrmacht was unable to finish them off and instead allowed the Soviets to not only reestablish their tank armies, but increase their strength to levels never before seen. And the old approach of diverting most of their armor into smaller units to support the infantry has been finally abandoned. Instead, the Red Army concentrates their strength into
Tank Corps and Brigades. The medium T-34/76 has secured its place as the main workhorse of the Red Army throughout 1943. Its superior diesel engine, decent gun, and sloped armor plates give it enough versatility on the battlefield to be reliably useful in both offensive and defensive operations. Yet with the appearance of the German Tigers and Panthers, the T-34 needs some well-deserved upgrades. Next to a new command cupola and an extended three-man turret, the main step forward is the 85mm D-5
t gun. Sure, the T-34 is still not a looker, nor is it the kind of quality you would find in German or Western workshops, but Soviet industry has by now perfected the production cycle. In the time and energy it takes German manufacturers to build one Panzer 4, there are six T-34’s rolling out of the Soviet factory gates. Paint-jobs and polishing are not necessary, what counts is industrial output. So overall, the Soviets are now able to outproduce the Germans more than 10x in tanks and assault g
uns, leading to an all-time advantage of 7-1 in armor on all fronts. Sure, Soviet tank training is still lackluster. A couple kilometers of driving, a few rounds on the range, testing of the machine-gun, and the tank is ready for frontline service. Ok, the Red Army does its best to modernize and overhaul its tank force. The heavy KV-1 and 2 tanks are finally phased out. Despite some new concepts, the KV series as a whole prove ultimately a dead end in a larger operational context. Same goes for
the thin-skinned T-70 light tanks, whose main benefit in 1943 is the sheer numbers that can be put into the field as infantry support. In their stead come the heavy IS-tanks and the SU-self propelled artillery guns. The IS-122 or IS-2- that is the new heavy tank and an indirect response to the German Tiger I and II. The 122mm gun fires massive 25kg high-explosive shells. These are six times heavier than a Panther round and three times heavier than a Tiger one. With armor 100mm thick, the IS-2 is
sent to all Guards Heavy Tank Regiments over 1944 as a breakthrough tank. For the infantry, the Soviets introduces the SU-self propelled guns. The SU-76 is basically a 76.2mm ZIS-3 anti-tank gun put onto the chassis of a T-34. This frees up the actual battle tanks, while also providing the infantry with more firepower against enemy armor. Unlike the shaky Nazi hierarchy, Stalin holds a firm grip on production and standardization. Inner squabbles like the Germans have between Porsche and Hensche
l about a new prototype are impossible, as everything has to be just practical and “good enough”. Also, unlike the Germans, the Soviet factories do not suffer from heavy bombing anymore, nor do they worry about building for a navy at the same time. And of course having to worry just about one front makes an overall much more concentrated approach much easier. It is also fair to say that without the immense amount of lend-lease armor steadily coming in through the Persian corridor, the Soviet tan
k force would have a much harder time going on the offensive. The amount of Matildas, Valentines, Stuarts, Lees, Grants and Shermans that bolster the Soviet lines over the years… well, it’s a lot. But all that superiority in numbers meant little as long as the Soviet Generals did not know how to use them in the field. The Germans always had tactical superiority through their excellent use of combined warfare, even with a much smaller and technically inferior tank force, but while the German Army
is losing its edge, the Red Army’s capabilities for massive armored operations only grow. Over the course of 1943 and 1944, the Soviets slowly but surely close the gap. The Deep Battle doctrine is in direct response to the tactical superiority of the German training and experience. For too long the Soviets simply tried to copy the German approach by sending their best units into the first wave of attack in order to force a breakthrough. The Wehrmacht was still more than capable of not only blun
ting such a spearhead, but just breaking it apart despite being outnumbered. But by relying on different echelons of armor and motorized infantry that are also adequately supported by artillery and air-attacks, they are able to exhaust their enemy’s defensive capabilities. Instead of punching through like the Germans, they gradually use their numbers to bend and eventually break the enemy’s lines. Overall, it is clear to see that the tables have turned. Where the German Panzer Divisions are grad
ually bleeding strength and suffering from degraded or damaged armor, the Red Army is on the rise. Not just numerically but tactically as well. To put it bluntly, Soviet High Command has gotten its act together and learned how to use their tank force according to the doctrines of combined arms operations. Outproducing the Germans at every step, the Red Tank Armies prepare for the final push into the Reich itself. If you want to see a special we did on the eve of Operation Barbarossa about the st
ate of German and Soviet armor at the time, click here to check that out, and join the TimeGhost Army at TimeGhost.tv or patreon.com so we can make ever more awesome specials like these ones.

Comments

@WorldWarTwo

What’s your favourite tank of the war, and why?

@gafeleon9032

Just a quick correction, the SU-76 isn't built on the chassis of the T-34 but a lengthened T-70 chassis and while it has some limited anti-tank capabilities by 1944 the 76mm is mostly only useful for close support Love your work

@HistoryHussar

Hungarian 1st Army received 10 Tigers in the Summer of 1944. They were effective in combat, but most of them would be lost within a few months, mainly due to mechanical breakdowns and a lack of fuel. Since the Hungarians did not have anything that could tow a Tiger (aside from another Tiger, which exposed both tanks to enemy fire), they proved to be too heavy and cumbersome to operate over the long term. By October, 3-4 were left, but we are not sure what happened to them.

@michaelmorley7719

As The Chieftain has pointed out in multiple videos, the Panther also featured challenging ergonomics. It is a very difficult tank to learn to use effectively.

@Red_Four

The Tiger 1 we have in the US Army Armor and Cavalry collection at Fort Moore was captured in a maintenance area towards the end of the North Africa campaign. Some of the parts on that tank contain serial numbers that belonged to around a dozen other Tigers from that unit.

@podemosurss8316

6:02 About tungsten, being Spanish, I remember hearing stories on the ways that our government (aligned with Germany) used to transfer them tungsten through the borders without the Allies knowing: It was in small ore chunks, the size of a fist, that could be carried easily. Children in border towns would be hired for extra cash and given those "stones" to play throwing the stones onto the other side of the border, where German agents collected those stones. They also tied them to dogs and made it look like a kid's prank.

@Ralphieboy

The USA sent some 225,000 2.5 ton cargo trucks, 1,000 locomotives and around 7,000 railway freight cars. That not only freed up a lot of Soviet heavy industry to concentrate on tanks, but it gave them the logistical ability to successfully support deep battle.

@pennings855

OMG I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE HOW WELL THE FERDINAND PERFORMED

@pianowhizz

Gotta love that Christie suspension! Americans + Russians working together = unbeatable 😊

@gunman47

I always like Special episodes like these, at this late stage of the war you can really see how tank warfare has evolved over time. Thank you Sparty and team as always!

@carrickrichards2457

Lendlease sent over 4100 Sherman tanks to the soviets. About half each 75 mm and 76 mm armed. 1st Guards Mechanized Corps, the 3rd Guards Mechanized Corps, 6th Guards Tank Army and the 9th Guards Mechanized Corps, were fully lend lease equiped. The Sherman was widely liked, much more than the 2850 other western tanks supplied in the Lendlease program (including nearly 1400 Valentines armed with 40mm or 57mm). The radios, trucks and spares (and 15 million pairs of boots) may have been as important.

@OneofInfinity.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder Indy, the T-34/85 is a looker to me.

@dbassman27

Thanks for another excellent video. BTW, the SU 76 was actually based on a modified T 70 chassis. Cheers.

@Maus5000

To be fair to the PzKpfw III I think the torsion bars themselves stand the test of time as a great method in general, and the III's specifically seem to have worked just fine. What let down the running gear overall was the narrow track, and perhaps the smaller diameter of the roadwheels themselves compared to T-34

@thanos_6.0

FINALLY! Another special episode! I really missed these🥳

@althesmith

Sometimes "good enough" is pretty damn awesome.

@nodirips_8537

There is a mistake at 11: 43, the SU 76 self propelled gun is not based in the T-34 hull, it is based in the T - 70 light tank hull. The advantage of the " turretless tank" is that a bigger gun can be installed in the same hull. The T-70 tank features a 45 mm gun the SU 76 spg wich is based on the basic T-70 hull features a 76 mm gun.

@user-bm7bj6kq9e

Indy, I know you've got a lot of people behind you on the show (and they're amazing too), but I gotta hand it to you, I love your voice and delivery - even after 4 years (?) it's always spot on.

@sealove79able

A great video.From the 37-40mm to 122-128mm tank guns in just 5 short years.

@OuijTube

I nearly snorted my morning coffee with that Lord Humungous opening