MODERATOR: Good morning, and welcome to
the Washington Foreign Press Center’s briefing on the U.S. Global Energy Policy
Priorities. My name is Zina Wolfington, and I’m the moderator for this briefing. This
briefing is on the record. The transcript will be posted on the website fpc.state.gov after the
briefing. For the journalists joining us on Zoom, please take a moment now to rename yourself in the
chat window with your name, outlet, and country. Our briefer today is Geoffrey Pyatt, assist
ant
secretary of the State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources. Following his opening
remarks, I will open the floor for questions. And with that, I’m going to turn it
over to Assistant Secretary Pyatt. ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: Great. Good morning,
everybody, and it’s great to be back at the Foreign Press Center. I know we’ve got a broad
range of interests and questions this morning, so I’ll try to keep my opening remarks fairly
brief. And just to share a few reflections, last week I
spent four days in Houston, Texas
at CERAWeek, which is the world’s largest energy conference. And it was a particularly
opportune moment, both to do a lot of the kind of intensive energy-focused coordination that
ENR does all the time, but also, I think, to take the temperature of the international energy
community at a moment of profound transformation. For me, there were two key takeaways from the
CERAWeek discussion, and then an area of future focus. The two takeaways were both the con
tinued
acceleration of the global energy transition, and the especially important American leadership
in that regard. The Inflation Reduction Act in particular is clearly changing the conversation
here domestically, but also internationally, about the opportunities around new
clean energy technologies, ranging from carbon sequestration to clean hydrogen
to advanced battery storage technologies. And the – all of the issues around the
acceleration of the electrification of our energy systems
– transportation, lots and lots
of focus in Houston on artificial intelligence and the huge growth in demand for power that is going
to create for cloud computing centers here in the United States and internationally; but also,
and I think as an American energy diplomat, a particular point of pride, how American
companies are leading the charge in this regard, leveraging the opportunities that the Inflation
Reduction Act is creating, the degree to which the IRA has really supercharged an e
nergy
transition that was already well underway. The other framing aspect of the conversations
in Houston actually built on what I did the Friday before traveling to Houston, which was
the annual U.S.-EU Energy Council. We were very pleased to have Commissioner Kadri Simson and
Director General Ditte Jorgensen both at the State Department for the annual Energy Council.
This year in particular was a celebration of the tremendous progress that we have made
in our transatlantic energy relatio
nship, the degree to which Europe has exceeded
expectations in de-risking its exposure to Russian energy coercion – dramatically reducing
Europe’s dependence on Russian oil, gas, coal, and looking to the future, nuclear fuel – but
also the very strong alignment between U.S. and European objectives as we seek to navigate
the disruption of global markets that Putin’s invasion of Ukraine and the weaponization
of Russia’s energy resources has prompted. And then the area of future focus – and
I
think we’ll see more on this in the weeks ahead – are the issues around critical
minerals, which is an issue where ENR has led the State Department’s work internationally,
including through our flagship initiative, the Mineral Security Partnership, which seeks
to bring together likeminded countries around the world to mobilize resources and mobilize
our private sectors to reduce our dependence on a single country as the principal supplier of
the energy minerals that are so important to our
transition. As some of my European colleagues put
it in Houston, we have to work very, very hard to ensure that an era of European dependence on
Russian oil and gas is not followed by an era of collective dependence on China for all of these
processing and extraction of critical minerals. In that regard, there were some
really interesting conversations, especially with our private sector companies,
looking at what the State Department is doing through MSP, through MINVEST, our private
sec
tor partnership; with SAFE, the energy security NGO here in Washington. And as I said
to Dan Yergin at one point, I think in some ways the conversation around critical minerals is a
little bit like where the conversation around oil was in the 1970s after the oil shocks and
the creation of the International Energy Agency. We are starting to think about these critical
minerals not just as a commodity issue but as a question of national security. And it’s
in that spirit that we approach this i
ssue, and it’s in that spirit that we are working with
the 14 [correction: 15 MSP partners] countries and economies that are part of the MSP coalition, significantly now representing more than half
of global GDP. You will see a bit more on this, I think, next week when Secretary Blinken
will be back in Europe. But you’ve also seen the statements from Under Secretary Fernandez,
including around the SAFE Summit two weeks ago, and all of the work that we are doing
in the MSP context to mobiliz
e partners, to mobilize resources, to leverage what the
White House has done through the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment, and to,
as I said, approach these questions not just as an issue of industrial policy or as a commodity
question but as a matter of national security. So let me stop my opening comments there,
and happy to have the usual broad range of questions. It’s been a very, very busy couple
of months for ENR. I think I started out 2024 in Riyadh just a couple
of weeks after the
new year and have been around the world a couple of times since then, reflecting, I
think, the just tremendous opportunities that we see in the energy security and energy
transition spaces, but also the centrality of so many of these issues to our overall
national security and diplomatic agendas. MODERATOR: Thank you for the remarks. And now
I would like to open it up for questions. A reminder for journalists joining us via Zoom –
please be sure your screen includes your
name, outlet, and country. We will start with
the questions from the room. If called, please introduce yourself before
your question. We’ll start with you. QUESTION: Thank you, Zina. Thank you, Ambassador.
Iaroslav Dovgopol, UkrInform News Agency, Ukraine. So, Ambassador, you said – you mentioned
about circumstances of Russian war in Ukraine, and I obviously have a question regarding – would
you please reveal the long-term projects related to the U.S.-Ukraine interaction in the energy
dom
ain? And in context of the recent Russian attacks on the Ukrainian energy infrastructure,
does the – U.S. administration have funding in the recently approved budget to help Ukraine in
the energy sector? And is the U.S. planning to provide such assistance any time soon? And
if I may, I have then one more question. ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: Okay. So let me begin,
Iaroslav, by just saying my heart goes out to the millions of Ukrainians who’ve been affected
by the latest wave of Russian attac
ks that began on Friday, the biggest single series
of air strikes against energy infrastructure since the start of the war. This is a focus of
tremendous attention across the administration, including Secretary Blinken. We are working very
closely with allies and partners around the world. I also want to note just our tremendous,
tremendous admiration for the Ukrainian energy workers who are responding to this
situation. Just this morning I had a long discussion with the Volodymyr Kudrytsky
i, the
CEO of Ukrenergo, the national grid operator. Volodymyr described to me the recovery efforts
that are being made in Kharkiv, in Burshtyn, in Krivyi Rih, in Dnipro, in Odesa. We have seen
a complex set of tactics by Putin – who spent, by the way, hundreds of millions of dollars in
munitions in these series of attacks. There has been tremendous progress over the past few days
in recovery, but there has also been great damage. I will note some of the good news, which is that
the passiv
e protection measures that the United States and our European allies have been helping
to support – did prove its utility at a number of sites. But Putin was able to inflict significant
damage as well. And I just want to underline how outrageous it is that the Kremlin continues to
target these civilian objects with no military objective, simply to cause pain and suffering
among Ukrainian citizens. And we will respond. I will host tomorrow another in the series
of G7+ energy sector support v
ideos that the United States helped to organize, at
the time jointly with our German allies, starting in October of 2022. This will be one of
the most important of these calls that we’ve done. We will have Minister Galushchenko from Kyiv, but
also Mr. Kudrytskyi and other Ukrainian officials, to present their damage assessment
and also their immediate requirements. We need to do several things at the same time. We
will be seeking to mobilize immediate assistance, as we have been doing since
October of ’22
when these energy sector attacks began. We will also be continuing our work to focus on
Ukraine’s long-term objective of building a future energy system that is cleaner, greener,
and fully aligned with European standards. But I want to emphasize also that Putin is
failing. This is – we are now at the end of the third winter of Russia’s war against the
people of Ukraine. Ukraine has demonstrated tremendous resilience, thanks in large part to
the courage of energy workers fro
m companies like Ukrenergo and DTEK. The lights have
stayed on. Putin has failed in that effort. He has lost Europe as an energy market. And we are
committed to ensuring that that failure continues. I think – you asked about future resources. Last
June, at the London Ukraine Recovery Conference, Secretary of State Blinken announced $522
million in energy sector assistance to tackle those two challenges that I talked about,
both the immediate reconstruction and recovery, but also the long-te
rm resilience and
Europeanization of Ukraine’s energy system. That remains our guiding objective. We are working
very, very hard and hope very much that Congress will approve the President’s national security
supplemental as soon as they come back from the Easter recess. I think the attacks of the past
few days make that action even more urgent. I know that the White House is optimistic that
we will get a positive outcome from Congress, and that’s certainly what I hear from
members of Cong
ress when I speak to them. So we will assess where we are in terms of
requirements. We will coordinate with our allies, who are carrying a significant
amount of the burden. And then we will begin our work looking towards
the next Ukraine Recovery Conference, which will be hosted by Germany
in Berlin at the middle of June. MODERATOR: You have a follow-up? QUESTION: And yeah, my second question, thank
you. After the recent Russian attack on the Dnipro hydropower station, how does the United
States read these threats for other major power plants in Ukraine, including NPPs? And do
you have any interaction with the allies, partners with the Russians,
to prevent potential disaster? ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: So we see
a consistent pattern of irresponsible Russian actions. You mentioned the attack
on the Dnipro hydropower plant. Last night I saw in Ukrainska Pravda the photographs of
the destroyed Kharkiv central heating plant and thermal power plant. DTEK has shared with me
the p
ictures of destruction at Burshtyn. Again, Putin’s actions have crossed every line
in terms of his military tactics and the destruction that he is inflicting with no
military objective on the people of Ukraine and Ukraine’s infrastructure. President von der
Leyen and all of our European allies have made clear that Putin and Russia has to be held
accountable for those actions, and that, as President von der Leyen has put it, the aggressor
will pay. So there is a cost attached to this. But in
the meantime, we are going to
do everything in our power to ensure that Putin’s war continues to be a
strategic failure for the Kremlin, and that the Ukrainians have the resources and the
wherewithal they need to prevail and to continue to sustain the extraordinary resilience
that they’ve demonstrated up until now. MODERATOR: Please. QUESTION: Diyar Aziz from RUDAW
media. I have two questions on Iraq. We know that the Iraq is heavily
dependent on Iran on the electricity. ASSISTANT SECRETA
RY PYATT: Right. QUESTION: Iraq speaking to both (inaudible)
according to some reports, there hasn’t been a significant (inaudible). And this led the U.S. in
waiving sanctions in Iraq – the last time it was the first time that U.S. (inaudible) sanctioned
for Iraq to buy electricity from Iran, which some U.S. Congress members says that this led the
financial lifeline for Iran that Iraq is funding. So how long are you going to waiving sanctions
in Iraq to buy electricity from Iran? And then h
ow do you see that purpose that Iraq is doing
to find alternatives to the Iranian electricity? ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: No, well, thank you
very much for the question. There are a series of absolutely vital issues that are embedded
in the question. And I had the honor of joining yesterday’s meeting between my boss, Secretary
of State Blinken, and the deputy prime minister, foreign minister of Iraq, Fuad Hussein.
These issues were front and center in those conversations, as they will be fr
ont and
center when the Iraqi prime minister comes here to the United States. I’ve been working
with the Iraqi ambassador on that visit, including opportunities for engagement
with American energy companies, because of the central role that in particular the oil
and gas industry plays in the Iraqi economy, but also because of the issue that you
referred to, which is the vulnerability created by Iraq’s requirement for energy
imports, both gas and power, from Iraq. I will note a couple – the
re are a couple of
different issues that are wrapped around this. One is the waiver, and I think they – the department’s
actions on that issue speaks for itself. This is a topic on which I regularly engage with members
of Congress. Another is the work that we continue to do with officials in Baghdad, with officials
in Ankara, and with the KRG on the reopening of the ITP pipeline, which is an energy asset that
the United States very much wishes to see brought back online because of the criti
cal role that
that provides in helping to sustain the energy economy of the KRG region, but also because of
the product, the crude oil that that pipeline delivers to global and especially European markets
that are hungry for non-Russian sources of supply. I am – I will be part of the discussions
during the Iraqi prime minister’s visit, in particular the work of the HCC. And we
talked a little bit about that with the deputy prime minister yesterday. And in that HCC
context, it’s very clear
that ENR issues around energy – energy security, gas, electricity, oil,
decarbonization – will be front and center. We also have been very supportive of the work that
Iraq has been doing with global energy companies, including American companies like
Baker Hughes, which has projects to capture some of the gas which is currently
vented and flared from Iraqi oil fields. We’ve also been very supportive of
the work that Total has been doing, the multi-billion-dollar investment
that Total has m
ade for a similar gas capture and energy initiative. This is a
critical part of helping to build Iraq’s own energy security and to achieve
what the prime minister has stated is his goal of ending dependence on Iranian
energy within the next three or four years. In that regard, I also look forward to
traveling myself to Iraq hopefully later this spring to advance the work that will
be done during the prime minister’s visit, and in particular to advance our agenda
around supporting Iraq’s en
ergy security. QUESTION: (Inaudible) at which they provided
about 0.5 percent to the global oil supply. Now there are some issues between the U.S. companies
that are operating in the Kurdistan region and the Iraqi Government, which the Iraqi Government
says that the U.S. companies are not willing to operate, even the – with green light on that.
Do you think the Iraqi Government is reasonable that they are not giving the things that the
U.S. companies and the KRG are requesting from the Iraq
i Government from that? Dispute is that
they do have around KRG oil exports. And why this hasn’t happened? Because the U.S. engaging
with Türkiye, with Iraq, and the Kurdistan region. Why it’s been a year that the KRG
oil has been stopped and it’s not resumed? ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: So I’ll – I don’t want
to put myself in the middle of the commercial negotiations between our companies that are
active in KRG and the government in Baghdad. But what I will underline is I know that the
Ira
qi Government is interested in attracting more foreign investment to its energy sector, and
in particular to modernize that energy sector, to make it cleaner, to maximize the
availability of energy for Iraqi citizens. That will be much more difficult as long as the
issues around the ITP remain unresolved. This is also an issue that I’ve had regularly on my
agenda with Turkish Energy Minister Bayraktar, and it’s a regular topic of conversation,
not just in the U.S.-Iraq context but also in t
he U.S.-Türkiye context. So I hope very
much that we will be able to see progress on this issue in the run-up to and around the
prime minister’s visit. But that ultimately is going to depend on what’s really a three-sided
conversation between Baghdad, Erbil, and Ankara, and then also the commercial negotiations
with our companies that are on the ground. MODERATOR: Tuna. QUESTION: Thank you. Thank you very much for
that presentation, Mr. Pyatt. It’s good to see you again here. Thank you very
much for the
briefing. Tuna Sanli from Turkish Radio and Television (inaudible). (Inaudible) Foreign
Minister Hakan Fidan visited Washington, D.C. and met with U.S. Secretary of State
Antony Blinken. There were broad range of topics on the table, and energy was one of them.
It’s one of the hot topics between two countries, as both Türkiye and the United States say
they look forward to increase the energy cooperation in various (inaudible). First of all,
can you give us details about that
energy topic in that strategic mechanism meetings between Turkish
foreign minister and the Secretary of State? ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: So let me say a
couple of things here. One is just to underline my personal focus on our energy partnership with
Türkiye and the importance that we place on making continued progress. I have had the opportunity
to meet with Energy Minister Bayraktar on three different continents, I think, as we’ve all
traveled around the world. I last saw him in Riyadh wh
en we were together there in January. And
then last month, I was very pleased also to see Minister Bayraktar’s deputy when we were together
at the IEA 50th anniversary in Paris. So we are maintaining a regular tempo of engagement, both
between Washington and the energy ministry and authorities in Ankara, but also with the foreign
ministry. And I am very glad to have a really strong relationship with my counterpart
in the Turkish foreign ministry as well. I think as we look to the future, th
e next step,
we hope very much to be able to welcome Minister Bayraktar here to Washington in the weeks ahead
over the course of the spring. The ball is really in his court in terms of figuring out when we
can manage that. But we have a very rich agenda of work to do together following the discussions
between Secretary Blinken and Minister Fidan in the context of the strategic mechanism. We
see this both on European energy security, and Türkiye has played a very important role
as the host
of the Southern Gas Corridor, in helping to diversify European energy
supplies and European gas supplies away from dependence on Russia; as the host of multiple
LNG liquefaction facilities, which have received a lot of American LNG over the past two years
since the beginning of the war in Ukraine. You may have seen a speech that I gave to a forum
in Alexandropolis about two weeks ago. It’s on the State Department website. But I described
there our support for the Vertical Corridor, which is
designed to bring non-Russian gas up into
Central Europe, including to markets like Hungary, Austria, and Slovakia that remain dependent on
Russian gas. This will be especially important in the context of what we expect will be
the end of transit through Ukraine at the end of this year when the transit contract
expires. So there’s an important potential role for Türkiye there as well as an
entry point for non-Russian gas into that Vertical Corridor, which would go
up through Bulgaria, Rom
ania, Moldova, and Ukraine, leveraging the gas storage that
Ukraine has available in western Ukraine. And then there are all the issues around
energy transition, and I think I’ve shared the story before. I will always remember from
my time as ambassador in Athens a visit that I made to Rhodes in I think it was August
of 2021, which is when the terrible fires were happening across southwestern Türkiye.
The sky was bright orange over the island of Rhodes. It was all the smoke and the
flames
that were coming from Türkiye, and it was a reminder that, much like my
home state of California, much like Greece, Türkiye is extremely vulnerable to the effects of
climate change. The fact that the Mediterranean has seen some of the most severe sea temperature
change of any region of the world and the risks of more extreme fire events, but we are also
conscious of the leadership that Türkiye has played in deploying wind and solar and the
potential to do much more in this area. And then fi
nally, one of the follow-ups from the
strategic mechanism that I will look forward to discussing with Minister Bayraktar when he
comes to Washington is critical minerals, where Türkiye has literally thousands
of years of history in mining and the potential to be an important part of
our effort to diversify global supply chains for the critical minerals that
we need to power the energy transition. MODERATOR: Liudmila. QUESTION: Thank you. My name is Liudmila
Chernova. I’m with Sputnik News.
The Financial Times reported last Friday that the United
States had a contact with Ukraine and urged Kyiv to halt its drone attacks on Russian energy
infrastructure, and warned that it both provokes retaliation from the Russian side and drives up
global energy prices. The question is whether you can confirm such contacts with Ukraine and also
the effect of such effects on the global prices. ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: Yeah. So a couple
of things. As much as I admire the reporting of my long
time friend Chris Miller at the
Financial Times, I am not going to comment on our diplomatic exchanges. But what I will
emphasize, as John Kirby did from the White House, is that the United States does not encourage or
enable attacks on Russian territory. But what we are doing is supporting Ukraine as they seek
to defend their own sovereign territory against a brutal and unprovoked war that the Kremlin
has now unleashed on the people of Ukraine. And the Kremlin and Vladimir Putin will be he
ld
accountable, and we are going to continue giving the Ukrainians they – the tools they need
to defend their own sovereign territory. QUESTION: (Inaudible) prices? ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: I have not seen a great
shift in global energy prices in recent weeks. We have seen some dislocation partly for seasonal
factors, but in fact global energy markets are quite stable at this point. And you see that in
response to Putin’s weaponization of his energy resources, the disruptions created by H
outhi
attacks on shipping in the Red Sea. So I am quite – and as I said, the mood at CERAWeek
was quite confident about the resilience of global energy markets at this particular moment in
time, in part due to the work of American energy producers, as the United States has emerged
as the world’s largest oil and gas exporter. MODERATOR: We will now take a couple
questions from Zoom. Dmytro Anopchenko, please unmute yourself. QUESTION: Good morning, Mr. Pyatt. Thank
you for taking my questio
n. And thanks to Foreign Press Center for organizing this.
I’ve got one question on Ukraine. Mr. Pyatt, how would you describe the biggest threats to
Ukrainian energy system on this stage of the war? Because they obviously changed since October
when Ukraine was just preparing to survive during the winter. And also do you still think that
cyber attacks are among those threats? I know that a lot of help was provided to Ukraine
by the U.S. administration. According to CNN, Cisco even provided
the special equipment to
Ukrainian power plants to be protected from the cyber attacks. So could you give more details
if your office was the part of this? Do you still think that cyber threats is real and it’s among
the top three priorities for Ukraine? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: So Dmytro, on
your question, I mean, the first point is the biggest threat to Ukraine’s energy system is
Vladimir Putin and this one man’s obsession with Ukraine and his unrelenting aggression against t
he
Ukrainian Government and the people of Ukraine. Unfortunately, the story of cyber attacks
on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure is not a new story. It actually goes back to my tenure
as ambassador, and you will remember in 2015 there were some quite severe cyber attacks
against Ukraine’s energy infrastructure and then very close cooperation. I was working with
Chris Painter, who was our cyber coordinator at the State Department in those days – and also
with the experts of the Department of
Energy, who worked closely with the Ukrainian Ministry of
Energy, with Ukrenergo, and other institutions of the Ukrainian state – in order to ensure that
Ukraine’s critical infrastructure was hardened against Russian aggression to the maximum extent
possible. I would note also that my counterpart, our assistant secretary for the
CDP Bureau, was recently in Kyiv, which I think you can see – that’s Nate
Fick – and you can see Nate’s travel as a reflection of the fact that our cooperation
wi
th Ukraine on these issues is ongoing. I’m not going to get into further details there,
but just to underline that this is not new and our support is ongoing, and that I worry about
every single dimension of Putin’s threats to Ukraine’s energy system. The ballistic missiles
that were deployed starting over this weekend, the Shaheds, the cruise missiles, the attacks
that have been ongoing since October of 2022 now, seeking to dismantle Ukraine’s energy system
– this recent wave of attacks, w
hat was novel in these attacks was the intensive targeting of
generation capacity, and we will respond to that, as we talked about earlier, through the G7+
mechanism. And we are going to continue, as I said, to give Ukraine the tools that it
needs to defend its own sovereign territory, including recognizing that Putin, as the
NATO secretary general put it memorably, has tried to weaponize the winter, and we want
to ensure that that weapon is unsuccessful. MODERATOR: Next we’ll go to Alex Ra
ufoglu
online. Please unmute yourself, Alex. QUESTION: Zinaida, thank you so much
for doing this, and Assistant Secretary, thank you so much for your time. This is Alex
Raufoglu. I am from Turan News Agency. I have two quick questions and one follow-up. The
question was asked about this Russian energy infrastructure. I get the line that the U.S.
– it’s a familiar line that the U.S. does not encourage Ukraine to fight back in Russia, but
are there any constraints placed upon Ukraine in how
Ukraine defends itself, whether it needs
or not to take the fight back to Russia? I mean, Russian energy is a main source
of fighting and funding the war. What do you expect Ukraine to do if not fight
back by targeting the energy infrastructure? And second question: Is it too early to
declare the total victory over Putin’s efforts to weaponize the winter and
energy? You – Assistant Secretary, you said that they have failed, but there
are reports also out there about Russian efforts to skir
t the sanctions, so
I want to get your comments on that. And finally, if I may, you – as I understand, you recently met with Azerbaijan’s deputy
energy minister, who oversees COP29 efforts, and you said you’re looking forward to keeping up
COP28 momentum this fall in Baku. Can you please elaborate on that? Any particular deliverable you
are looking forward to seeing? Thank you so much. ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: Sure. Thank you for
both of those questions. Let me just – on Ukraine, what I w
ant to emphasize is this war has been a
catastrophic strategic failure for the Kremlin, for Vladimir Putin, one of the world’s great
examples of self-harm. Ukraine today is more united as a country than it has ever been
before in its independent history. Ukraine has a clear pathway to membership in the European
Union. NATO is stronger and larger than it was before Putin began this tragic invasion.
Russia has lost Europe as an energy market, and Europe will never again view Russia
as a reli
able energy supplier. The Ukrainian economy has fundamentally
reoriented itself towards the West. And so you ask is it too early to
declare Ukraine’s victory. It’s too early to declare Ukraine’s victory as long
as these terrible Russian attacks continue, Ukrainian civilians killed every single day
by cruise missiles and attacks on apartment buildings and destructions of schools
and hospitals. But I am quite confident, having spent more than a decade watching
this issue now, that this war w
ill be recorded by history as an extraordinary
strategic failure for Vladimir Putin. And then you asked about
COP29, and you are correct, I had very good discussions in Houston with the
deputy energy minister. I also had excellent discussions a few weeks ago when the energy
minister himself was here in Washington. I underlined the United States very strong
support to the Azeri presidency of COP29. I also met in Houston with the Emiratis, and I
emphasized how supportive we are of the Troika
mechanism that UAE, Azerbaijan, and Brazil
have developed to manage the agenda for COP28. You asked about deliverables, and let me
emphasize the issues that I’m responsible for, and I’m not going to speak to the UN climate
negotiations and the things that my colleagues Rick Duke and Sue Biniaz in SPEC are responsible
for. My focus is on the issues around the greening of our energy system, working to ensure
that the fossil energy that the world is going to continue to use is delivered in
t
he least climate-damaging way possible, which means sustaining our efforts
on methane abatement – we are very, very supportive of the announcement that President
Aliyev made in terms of Azerbaijan’s adherence to the Global Methane Pledge, and we’re working
now with companies like BP and Chevron and Exxon Mobile that are active in the Caspian
region to look at opportunities to capture more of the methane and associated gases that
have come from the countries that have recently signed the Glo
bal Methane Pledge in the region,
so Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan. We are also very interested in continuing the work
that Dr. Sultan Al Jaber did so effectively at COP28 to bring along the global energy companies,
the national oil companies. I also met in Houston with, for instance, the CEO of NNPC in Nigeria.
And on a lot of these issues of decarbonization, methane abatement, carbon sequestration, the
greatest part of the work has to be done with the national oil companies. An
d so the work
that UAE did in that regard was most welcome. Had a number of conversations in Houston with my
DOE colleague Brad Crabtree from the Office of Fossil Energy. Assistant Secretary Crabtree and
I have been centrally involved in work around the oil and gas decarbonization effort, the
contributions that many of our American oil and energy companies have made to the UN – excuse
me – the World Bank fund for methane abatement, leveraging that opportunity as well. So we have
a very dee
p agenda of priorities for COP29, and I think based on my conversations with the COP
president at Houston, I’m confident that there’s a strong degree of alignment between the goals that
President Aliyev set and the goals that the United States is going to bring to that – the next COP
and then also as we head towards Brazil in 2025. MODERATOR: We have time for
one more question. Sergey. QUESTION: (Inaudible.) Sergey Yumatov from Russian
TASS news agency. So you mentioned the price cap on Rus
sian oil. My question is: Are there ongoing
discussions within the G7 on further lowering the price cap, and (inaudible) the G7 consider any
additional steps in this regard? Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: Yes. The
short answer is yes. We are committed to working with our price cap coalition
to deny Russia the resources that it uses to prosecute this terrible war against
the people of Ukraine. So you have seen the steps that we have taken as part of the
price cap coalition to step up
enforcement, including of the attestation by shipping
companies. You have seen the sanctions that we have leveled against ships and shipping companies
that have found to be skirting those requirements. You’ve also seen the work that we are
undertaking to systematically target projects which are focused on Russia’s future
energy production capacity – so, for instance, the sanctions against Novatek, against the
Arctic LNG 2 project, which are clearly having an effect based on the complaints
that have
come from Moscow about those sanctions actions. You’re also seeing a systematic effort
to go after shipping. You’ve seen the recent sanctions that we have leveled against
Sovcomflot and a number of Sovcomflot vessels. There will be more – I promise you that –
as we seek to tighten the sanctions regime around Russia. I’m not going to preview specific
sanctions actions, but what I am here to tell you is that we are committed to the forceful
implementation of those sanctions measure
s. Significantly also an issue that we have
talked about in the context of the US-EU Energy Council – and which I think is mentioned
in the very good joint statement from the Energy Council – is the question of Russian nuclear fuel
and services, where we as the G7 are committed to phasing out our dependence and where Congress
took important steps last week to implement what Secretary Granholm talked about in her
testimony before Congress last week as well, which is an eventual ban on the im
port
of Russian nuclear fuel into the United States and the regeneration of our fuel
industry domestically here in the U.S. to propel our own growth of our nuclear
industry and to decouple from Russian supplies just as Europe has succeeded in
decoupling from Russian gas, coal, and oil. MODERATOR: Thank you. This
concludes the Q&A session. I will now turn it over to our
briefer for any last thoughts. ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: No,
well, thank you very much. Again, I really appreciate the o
pportunity to be with
the FPC today. I would also emphasize – as I did at the top – just how central these issues have
become to so many of our bilateral relationships. We talked a little bit about Türkiye. I also
joined Secretary Blinken yesterday with the Kazakh foreign minister, and I will see
Deputy Foreign Minister Kairat Umarov later today to talk about another issue
that affects the interests of Türkiye, which is our support for Caspian
energy diversification as well. But this has r
eally become a defining aspect of
our bilateral relationships around the world, whether it’s how we work with Europe, how we work
with our partners in Ukraine, how we work with the developing world on the issues around critical
minerals – and we haven’t talked today about Latin America, haven’t talked so much about Sub-Saharan
Africa, but this too remains a very high priority. And then finally Asia. We’re looking ahead soon to
welcoming Japanese Prime Minister Kishida. I was with the Korean
ambassador yesterday looking
ahead to the U.S.-EU-Korean energy security dialogue [correction: It is the U.S.-Korea
energy security dialogue], which will take place in Houston at the end of next month,
at the end of April. But what you see is a systematic effort to leverage America’s energy
abundance, to advance our national security, but also to reinforce the security of
our allies and friends around the world. MODERATOR: I would like to give special thanks
to both our briefer for sharin
g his time with us today and to all the journalists who participated.
This concludes today’s briefing. Thank you. ASSISTANT SECRETARY PYATT: Thank you very much.
Comments