In the aftermath of the racial awakening, attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and affirmative action make the call to support long-standing Black-led civil rights organizations more relevant than ever. Rahsaan D. Hall is the president and chief executive officer of the Urban League of Eastern Massachusetts (ULEM). He brings more than 20 years of experience in civil rights and criminal justice to the role. Since opening to the Greater Boston community in 1919, ULEM has been employing a multi-point strategy to deliver services and programs which aim to increase self-reliance, specifically in the area of workforce and economic development.
Hall previously served as the director of the Racial Justice Program at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Massachusetts and is the founder of Rahsaan Hall Consulting. Prior to the ACLU, Rahsaan served as Deputy Director and Interim Director for the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights (Lawyers for Civil Rights) and worked as an assistant district attorney for the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at https://www.ted.com/tedx
Transcriber: Leticia Silva
Reviewer: Jiwoo Park I looked across the courtroom
and there he was. He looked a little bit like I looked
when I was 18 years old. Emboldened by the hubris of youth and a bravado that was masking
his insecurities and the uncertainty that he was facing. Two years to two years, and
one day to be served in the Suffolk County House of correction.
You can go with the court officer. You’re all set. All set, that uniquely
ubiquitous New England firm that simplifies satisfacti
on. I'm
all set with this meal. I'm all set with another round
of drinks. All set. A firm that erects an empathy
proof barrier. I'm all set with your solicitations
for money or your inquiries as to whether I know Jesus is my personal
Lord and Savior. All set? It precedes the end of an interaction. I'm all set because I can't
help you anymore. You're all set because I don't think
you deserve help. You're all set. That's what the clerk said to this young
man as she shuffled her papers, preparing f
or the next case
to come before the court. Shock and frustration overtook his face, and he glared at me with this look
of betrayal, as if to say, you don't know anything about
me or my circumstances. And in that moment I realized
he wasn't all set. I had been a prosecutor
for about two years. By the time I had prosecuted this young
man for selling crack in a school zone, an offense that did not warrant the two year mandatory minimum sentence
that he had just received. And although I stayed in th
e DA's office
for many more years and prosecuted more and more crimes for more and
more serious offenses, most of the people who I was prosecuting
were not all set. And even after I moved on from the DA's
office and went into civil rights law, most of the people who I had represented,
almost all of whom were people of color, were not all set, despite
the representations of the individuals from the
various institutions and agencies who had either mistreated
or ignored my clients. Generations of d
isinvestment
and disenfranchisement and discrimination have created
circumstances in communities of color that deny access to opportunities to
effectively and comprehensively change the trajectory of our lives and
the communities outcomes. Even now, as the newly appointed
president of a 105 year old black led civil
rights organization. We are still fighting against the intolerable conditions that Doctor
King so eloquently said provoke riots, the language of the unheard. The problem we're trying
to address is
how do we build power and wealth, meaning equitable financial well-being
in communities of color, and do it in a way that it can impact
and change the trajectory of lives so that we can address those intolerable
conditions and those circumstances, the circumstances that would lead to an 18 year old selling drugs
in his community, or living in a community that was over,
surveilled by the police. The circumstances that lead to the glaring disparities in wealth
that were reported on i
n 2015, in the Federal Reserve Bank. The Color of Wealth in Boston, which reported that the median wealth of a white family is
roughly $247,000 , compared to $8 of a black family. The circumstances that lead to the gross
disparities in maternal mortality rates and other health disparities that were
laid bare during the Covid 19 pandemic. And to put a finer point on it, how do we
do it in a way that is not paternalistic? We've got to avoid perpetuating
the pathologies of the nonprofit industrial
complex. We've got to move away from those deficit
based narratives that describe the deficiencies in our community, and move towards an asset based approach
that has a critical examination of the relationship between race and class. You see, when the Urban League
was founded in 1910, black people were fleeing racial violence
in the South in droves. They were headed to northern
cities looking for what sociologist Terry Reid describes
as not arms, but opportunities. But despite their desires, whe
n
they arrived in the north, they were met with similar levels of
racial capitalism and discrimination. That was actually part of the motivation
for the discrimination and segregation in the South. They were
given neither opportunities nor arms. All across America. In northern cities, people began to establish Urban League
affiliates to welcome and train the recent migrants from the South, but also to advocate against
discriminatory hiring practices and to advocate to make sure that there
was qu
ality housing available and quality educational opportunities. And since 1919, the Urban League of
Eastern Massachusetts has been doing the same thing for the residents of
Greater Boston. It's 2024 now. A lot of things have changed. But black led organizations that have
the ability to provide programming and advocacy and not only
shift the narrative, but build power and wealth in communities
to address those intolerable conditions. And those circumstances are
few and far between. And this is all
at a time where there
have been the gains, rather, to affirmative action and race. Conscious efforts to address those
generations of discrimination are under attack. So the question is, how do we intentionally build equitable
financial well-being and power in communities of color? Well,
at the Urban League. We do it by investing in the
assets in our community. We're working with entrepreneurs of
color through our next stage, mWBE or Minority Business
Enterprise Accelerator, which has been shown
to increase business
revenues for participants by 36% on average. We do it through
our symbol Coding Academy, which is training adults
for the jobs of today and tomorrow by teaching them coding,
cybersecurity, and eventually artificial intelligence.
Prompt engineering. Or through our Yoda program, which stands for Youth Opportunities
Developing Achievers. It's an initiative that works with young
people to provide Stem education supplements for middle and high school
students in our community, t
hrough drones and cybersecurity and
virtual reality and AI tools. Or new initiatives that we are bringing
online, like Red tails, a workforce development initiative
that will train and license formerly incarcerated
individuals and system involved individuals so that
they can take opportunities of the burgeoning employment opportunities
to that require licensed drone pilots. Or a black male mental health
initiative that has a twofold purpose to provide culturally
proficient mental health services
to black men, but it also creates
a pipeline to increase the number of service providers
who can serve our community. We're also engaged in policy advocacy. And this is important because in order to
build equitable financial well-being in communities of color, we have to
advocate for policies that will remove the barriers. And it's important
because many of the challenges that corporations and philanthropies are facing
may end up limiting all of the promises that they made back during
the so-ca
lled racial awakening of 2020. You see, long standing, black led
organizations don't need to have a diversity, equity and inclusion
initiative that's going to trigger the scrutiny of the very people who are
seeking to eliminate those programs. We are diversity, we are inclusive, and we have been
doing the work to make the conditions in our community
more equitable. We're providing programming and services
that will lead to policy change. We'll take the stories and anecdotes
and data and transla
te those into the policy advocacy that will lead
to transformational change. Transformational change, like closing
the racial wealth gap, which has been shown to increase
the US GDP by 4 to 6% . And that can happen by investing in
businesses of color who are more likely to hire people from their own community, thereby reducing the unemployment
rates in those communities, or investing in mental health service
providers of the same or similar racial or ethnic background, which have been
shown to h
ave positive outcomes on mental health outcomes
and perceptions of care. And you can see the correlation between
quality education opportunities and the reduction of the incarceration rates. 2020 brought a lot of proclamations
and promises from corporations and philanthropies about
how black lives matter. But there are a lot of promises
that are unfulfilled. And there are a lot of wavering
commitments moving forward. When the programs that have
been created to address the generations of discrimi
nation and
disenfranchisement are under attack, we must double down on investing in the
organizations that have been doing the work all along and are
closest to the pain. And as we embrace new and emerging ideas, we cannot lose sight of how these
organizations have long served these very communities. Our longevity and stability
should be seen as a catalyst for transformational change. So, you know, I don't know whatever
happened to that young man that I prosecuted all those years ago, and
I don'
t know that I ever will. But I do know that the work that I
have been involved in since then, and the work of the Urban League of
Eastern Massachusetts has been committed to to address those circumstances by
empowering communities and changing lives. And this is so important because, in the
words of the great Fannie Lou Hamer, nobody's free until everybody's free. Or to put a New England spin on it, nobody's all set until everybody's
all set. Thank you.
Comments
Thanks @TEDx Talks for posting this video about affirmative action / supreme court. Here are the viewpoints expressed by Supreme Court justices regarding affirmative action. 1) This case is about a group called Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) who sued Harvard College and the University of North Carolina (UNC). They said that these schools were not fair in their admissions process because they were using race as a factor, which they believed was against the law. The law they referred to is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment*. 2) The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. The SFFA believed that by considering race in admissions, Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally. 3) The Court looked at the history of the Fourteenth Amendment and how it has been used in the past. They also looked at how other cases involving race and college admissions were handled. They found that while diversity in a student body can be a good thing, it must be handled in a way that treats all applicants fairly and equally. 4) The Court also looked at the idea of "strict scrutiny*". This is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional. 5) The Court found that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC did not pass strict scrutiny. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear or specific enough, and it resulted in fewer admissions for certain racial groups. They also said that the schools' use of race in admissions seemed to stereotype certain racial groups, which is not allowed. 6) The Court also said that the schools' admissions systems did not have a clear end point. This means that there was no clear plan for when the schools would stop using race as a factor in admissions. This was another reason why the Court said the schools' admissions systems were not fair. 7) The Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear, specific, or fair enough to be allowed. 8) However, the Court also said that schools can consider how race has affected an applicant's life. They can look at how an applicant's experiences with their race have shaped them and what they can bring to the school because of those experiences. 9) In the end, the Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the law. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not allowed because it was not clear, specific, or fair enough. 10) So, the Court decided that the SFFA was right. They said that Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally in their admissions process, which is against the law. They said that the schools needed to change their admissions systems to be fair to all applicants, no matter their race. *The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. *Strict scrutiny is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional.
Great job. No excellent job. Very thought provoking and insightful!
Excellent. Keep up the great work Brother! -Lauri All set
All set. It is New England