Main

Jet Engine Evolution - From Turbojets to Turbofans

Turbofan model from the video: https://www.enginediy.com/products/1-20-turbofan-engine-diy-assembly-turbofan-frighter-ws-15-engine-model-kit-150-pcs?ref=d4a Turbojet model from the video: https://www.enginediy.com/products/1-3-turbojet-engine-model-kit-build-your-own-turbojet-engine-that-works-wp-85-turbojet-diy-aircraft-engine-model-100-pcs?ref=d4a Use code "d4a" to get 10% off on anything here: https://www.enginediy.com/?ref=d4a Support the channel by shopping through this link: https://amzn.to/3RIqU0u Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/d4a Become a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwosUnVH6AINmxtqkNJ3Fbg/join In our last video on jet engines, we have learned that just like piston engines jet engines do intake, compression, combustion, and exhaust but the big difference is that in piston engines these events occur one after the other in every cylinder whereas in a jet engine, these events occur continuously, all the time and they occur simultaneously with each other. In this video, we will explore how jet engines have evolved to become much more powerful and much more efficient. Now this engine is called a turbojet and by modern standards, this is very much obsolete. This right here is a turbofan, or more specifically a low by-pass turbofan, and an engine like this is nowadays most commonly found on fighter jets and other military aircraft. As you can see, even upon first glance, the engine is pretty different from our turbojet. Now the first, and most important difference is that in a turbojet, all the thrust generated by the engine comes from the exhaust stream, or the jet of expanding gasses coming out of the back. In other words, all the air that comes through the front of the engine ends up inside the core which houses all the key mechanical components of the engine. But in a turbofan, this is not the case. Not all the air ends up in the core, some of the air is bypassed around the core and never contacts the internal parts of the engine. So why would we bypass some of the air around the engine? Well to understand that we must remember that jet engines are also called reaction engines. Essentially they move incredible masses of air. This movement creates a force. And as we know for every force there is a reaction force in the opposite direction. This reaction force moves the engine and because the engine is attached to the aircraft the entire aircraft moves. This tells us that to travel faster and/or to move a larger heavier aircraft we must move greater masses of air. To move a greater mass of air we can either move more air or we can move the air faster. A turbofan engine exploits the first concept and that is to move more air. Now we have two kinds of turbofans, a high bypass and a low by-pass turbofan. When a civilian like you or me flies in a commercial aircraft we are propelled through the sky by a high by-pass turbofan. A high bypass turbofan takes the concept of moving more air to the extreme because at the very front of the engine, we will find a giant fan. This is where the name comes from, turbofan. We have a giant fan and gas turbines at the back which harness the energy of the combustion and thus power the fan. Now because the fan is so large it is capable of moving absolutely incredible amounts of air and about 80% of the thrust of the engine actually comes from the fan and only around 20% comes from the exhaust jet coming out of the back of the engine. Because most of the thrust comes from the fan it means that we don’t have to burn ridiculous amounts of fuel to move the aircraft. Modern fans are designed to be extremely efficient at cruising speeds and altitudes of commercial aircraft. The added benefit of the is that the bypassed air creates a sheath of air around the exhaust jet and this greatly reduces the noise pollution created by modern commercial aircraft. But unfortunately moving more air has its limits. You can’t make infinitely large fans because the greater the size of the fan the greater the difference in speed between the blade root and the blade tip, because the tip covers a much greater distance than the root. In other words, an overly large fan will inevitably achieve supersonic speeds at the blade tips and this leads to inadequate and inefficient operation. This is where low bypass turbofan engines like this one come in. Their bypass ratio is around 0.5 to 1 compared to the bypass ratio of commercial turbofans which is usually 9:1 and above. A bypass ratio of 9:1 tells us that for every kilogram of air going through the engine core 9 kilograms of air go around it. A special thank you to my patrons: Daniel Pepe Brian Alvarez Peter Della Flora Dave Westwood Joe C Zwoa Meda Beda Toma Marini Cole Philips #d4a #jetengine 00:00 Moving More Air or Moving it Faster 02:36 High Bypass vs Low Bypass 07:56 More Shafts More Efficiency 11:14 Gyros and Ducatis

driving 4 answers

7 days ago

In our previous video on jet engines we have  learned that, just like reciprocating piston engines, jet engines do intake, compression,  combustion and exhaust. The difference is that in every cylinder of a piston engine these events  occur one after the other, whereas in a jet engine these events occur all the time, continuously  and they occur simultaneously. In today's video we are going to learn how jet engines have  evolved during the past 50 or more years to become much more efficient and
much more powerful.  Now this type of engine that you can see right now is called a turbojet and by modern standards  this is very much obsolete. But something like this is not, because this is a turbofan or more  specifically a low bypass turbofan, and nowadays you most commonly find something like this in  fighter jets or similar military aircraft and as you can see, even upon first glance, this engine  is very different from our turbojet. Now, the first and most important difference is that i
n a turbojet, all the thrust generated by the engine comes from the exhaust stream or the jet of expanding  gases coming out at the back of the engine In other words, all the air that comes in at the  front ends up inside the core which houses all the key mechanical components. But in a turbofan this is not the case. Not all the air ends up inside the core. Some of the air is bypassed  around the core and never contacts the internal parts of the engine. So, why would we bypass some  of the air a
round the engine? What's the benefit of this? Well, to understand that we must remember  that jet engines are also called reaction engines Essentially they move very large masses of air.  Any movement of any mass creates a force and as we know for every force there is a reaction  force in the opposite direction. So, the engine pushes air out the back and the reaction moves the  engine forward. This reaction force also moves the entire aircraft because the engine is attached  to the aircraft, and
this tells us that to move a greater heavier aircraft or to travel faster  we have to move a greater mass of air within the same time period. And to do that we can either  move more air or we can move the air faster, at a greater rate Now a turbofan exploits the concept  of moving more air and we have two kinds of turbofans A high bypass turbofan and a low bypass  turbofan such as this one. But when a civilian like you or me travels in a commercial aircraft we  are actually propelled through th
e sky by a high bypass turbofan. A high bypass turbofan takes the  concept of moving more air to the extreme because at the very front of the engine we will find a  giant fan. This is where the name comes from We have a giant fan and a gas turbine at the back,  so turbo fan. The turbine harnesses the energy of the combustion and powers the fan. Now because the  fan is so large it is capable of moving absolutely incredible amounts of air and about 80% of the  thrust of the engine actually comes f
rom the fan and only around 20% comes from the exhaust jet  at the back of the engine. Modern turbofans on commercial airliners can easily move upwards  of 1,200 kg of air per second Because most of the thrust comes from the fan and not  from the core we do not have to burn ridiculous amounts of fuel to travel through the air. On top  of this modern fans are designed to be extremely efficient at cruising speeds and altitudes of  modern commercial aircraft and they're also really well balanced an
d they offer almost zero  resistance to movement. In fact, the giant fans on modern jet engines of commercial jet engines  they're more than 3 metersin diameter but you can initiate their movement with just one finger. The  added benefit is that the large amount of bypassed air creates a sort of protective thick sheath  around the exhaust jet coming from the core of the engine and this helps to greatly reduce engine  noise. But unfortunately there are limits to moving more air. The first limit
is that we obviously  can't make the fan at the front infinitely large some modern aircraft do have fan diameters which  are greater than their fuselage and it is possible to attach very large turbo fans to aircraft but  there is still a limit to this because at some point we get issues with ground clearance. But  even if issues with ground clearance magically disappeared you still can't make infinitely large  fans because the greater the size of the fan the greater the difference in speed betwe
en the blade root and the blade tip. Because the tip covers a much greater distance than the root. In other  words, an overly large fan will inevitably achieve supersonic speeds at the blade tips and this leads  to inadequate and inefficient operation This is where low bypass turbofans like this one come in.  Their bypass ratio is around 0.5 to1 compared to the bypass ratio of commercial turbofans which  is usually 9:1 and above. A bypass ratio of 9:1 tells us that for every kilogram of air goin
g  through the engine core, 9 kg of air go around it Conversely, for every kilogram of air going through  the core a bypass ratio of 0.5:1 gets only half a kilogram of air around the core. A low bypass  ratio is employed in order to improve the cruising efficiency of the engine and increase the range of a fighter jet. But at the same time the majority of the thrust comes by increasing the exhaust velocity. In other words instead of moving more air a low bypass turbofan moves the air faster. This
means that we are not limited by the size of the fan as with a high bypass turbofan. Here we  have much more thrust on tap. All we have to do is burn more fuel to increase the heat of the exhaust  jet because the hotter the gas the more it expands, the more it expands the greater its velocity, the  greater its velocity the greater the rate at which we move air through the engine, the greater this  rate the more thrust we generate. But unfortunately, here too there are limits and this time the l
imit  is temperature. At some point the gases in the combustion chamber will become so hot that they  will start to melt the turbine blades. In order to prevent this a lot of cooling air is added to the  combusted stream before it gets to the turbines Cooling air is also introduced through the turbine  blades themselves and it envelopes them creating a sort of protective film against the heat. These  large amounts of cooling air mean that jet engines contain large amounts of unburned air. In oth
er  words, they run pretty lean. To prevent turbine meltdown fighter jet engines make use of this fact  in order to generate incredible amounts of thrust and achieve supersonic speeds at the expense of  fuel efficiency. A reheater, more commonly known as an afterburner can be installed behind the  turbine wheels where it can add great amounts of fuel to the hot exhaust stream. The heat of the  exhaust stream is sufficient to combust the fuel and the unburned air in the exhaust stream means  that
we have all the preconditions to achieve near stochiometric air fuel ratios and incredibly high  temperatures of the exhaust stream We don't have to worry about turbine meltdown because the  afterburner is located after, behind the turbine The crazy temperatures achieved by the afterburner lead to dramatic gas expansion and insane exhaust gas velocity which leads to very very  high thrust. Unfortunately due to the very high fuel requirements afterburners can be employed  only for a short period
of time. The other key difference that you can spot between our ancient  turbojet and our modern low bypass turbofan is the increased number of compressor and turbine wheels  in the more modern engine. Our Turbojet only has a single compressor section and a single turbine  wheel to harness the energy of the expanding gases from the combustion chamber. The turbine wheel and  the compressor wheels are all mounted together on the same shaft so an increase in turbine speed  will lead to an equal in
crease in compressor speed Our modern turbofan does things differently.  It contains two shafts running concentrically One shaft runs inside the other. On the first shaft we  have the low pressure turbine wheels which spin the low pressure compressors. And on the second shaft we  have the high-pressure turbine wheel, a single wheel which spins the high pressure compressors. Such a  two shaft arrangement increases efficiency. Why? Because it allows us to run different wheels at  different speeds.
Now each compressor and turbine wheel achieves peak efficiency at a certain speed  or RPM. High pressure and low pressure wheels have different tasks, they off operate in different  environments and therefore they achieve their peak efficiency at different speeds, different  RPM. By having two shafts we can run each wheel set nearest to its peak efficiency RPM. On top of  this, it is always a good idea to have more wheels and wheel sets because this allows us to harness  the energy and increase
the pressure in a more incremental fashion, which in general improves  efficiency, however it also "improves" complexity, engine size and weight. Something else that  you might have noticed is that the shafts, the two shafts and the wheels on them, they spin in  different directions. Now this is not very common but it does exist on engines and when it is done,  again it's an attempt to increase efficiency A turbine or a compressor section consists of rotor  and stator blades. The rotors rotate,
the stators are stationary. The rotor blades sort of bite into  the air with the leading edge and push it back as they rotate, they accelerate the air. The actual  compression of the air and the pressure increase occurs in the stator, whose shape diverges. This  slows down the air. In simple terms, the aerodynamic shape of the stator converts the increased speed  of the air into increased pressure. The problem is that when the airflow leaves the stator it is not  traveling in an ideal direction
, so outlet guide vanes or guide nozzles are employed at the end  of a compressor or turbine section to rectify the air and direct it in a desirable direction  for the next set of compressor or turbine wheels Unfortunately these outlet guide vanes introduce  certain aerodynamic efficiency losses But if the next set of wheels spins in the opposite direction  then the need for these outlet guide vanes is greatly reduced or even completely eliminated. This  reduces aerodynamic losses and it also he
lps make the engine shorter and lighter. But there  is another reason why counter-rotating shafts like these are employed and that is to cancel out  the gyro effects of the engine. As you know if we take a wheel or a similar disc-shaped object and  spin it at very high speed it will tend to resist forces which try to change its position. As we  know, compressor and turbine wheels, they are wheels and they spin at very high speeds in a  jet engine. So the engine as a whole generates a gyroscopic
effect which means that it  makes it harder for the airplane to change its position Well, airplanes actually travel at very  high speeds pretty much all the time and at these high speeds the aero surfaces of the aircraft,  meaning the wing flaps and the rudders, they have a very high mechanical advantage, so they easily  overcome the gyro effect of the spinning wheels inside the engine and pilots really don't feel any  resistance or any issues with controlling the aircraft However, problems aris
e at low speeds,  when these aero surfaces have greatly reduced mechanical advantage, and this is for example why  the Rolls-Royce Pegasus engine employed in the Harrier jump jet, the hovering jet, this engine,  the Pegasus engine employed counter-rotating shafts The two shafts spinning in opposite  direction would cancel the gyro effect of each other leading to no net gyro effect on the  engine and no issues with the low speed hovering and maneuvering of this aircraft. This is also  important f
or example in motorcycles, Ducati is a nice example where they have an engine which  rotates in the opposite direction to the wheels So the engine cancels out some of the gyro effect  of the wheels and this makes it easier to change the direction of the motorcycle at very high  speeds. So that's pretty much it, there you have it The evolution of jet engines through multi  shaft arrangements and bypass ratios. As always, thanks a lot for watching, I'll be seeing you soon  with more fun and useful
stuff on the D4A channel

Comments

@d4a

Turbofan model from the video: https://www.enginediy.com/products/1-20-turbofan-engine-diy-assembly-turbofan-frighter-ws-15-engine-model-kit-150-pcs?ref=d4a Turbojet model from the video: https://www.enginediy.com/products/1-3-turbojet-engine-model-kit-build-your-own-turbojet-engine-that-works-wp-85-turbojet-diy-aircraft-engine-model-100-pcs?ref=d4a Use code "d4a" to get 10% off on anything here: https://www.enginediy.com/?ref=d4a Support the channel by shopping through this link: https://amzn.to/3RIqU0u Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/d4a Become a member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwosUnVH6AINmxtqkNJ3Fbg/join

@leighchamberlain25

The best description of how a jet fan works that I have ever heard

@aladecombatevirtualcuba4405

As an aeronautical engineer I affirm that this material is of good quality. super recommended for all audiences.

@CharlesVanNoland

Flying 4 Answers!!! I'm here for it :D

@staygray6212

As an aviation guy who watches your channel because cars are cool, I love to see you tackling stuff about aircraft. You have an incredible talent for explaining things my dogg.

@bowieinc

Every video of yours where I “know” the topic, I come away realizing there’s so much more to learn.

@leighchamberlain25

I just love the way you describe things in such a logical manner

@topquark6242

I worked for Rolls-Royce for 32 years and have experience on a whole range of engines from Speys (A 'leaky-turbojet' more than a turbofan) to BR-700's. I think you did a marvelous job explaining the basics. Obviously it is far more complicated when it comes to practical applications; trust me on this!

@jtocher685

As you said, turbofan engines of higher and higher bypass ratios have been developed to improve efficiency and reduce noise. To add a bit of engineering and physics to the discussion I offer the following: Noise - A significant source of jet engine noise is the shearing/mixing of high speed flow from the core with the lower speed flow surrounding it. In a turbojet engine, all the high speed core flow is interacting with the low speed flow around the outside of the engine, creating one very strong shear/mixing zone. With a turbofan engine the high speed core flow is mixing with the slower fan flow (still much faster than the overall flow over the engine) and the fan flow is mixing with the slower overall flow creating two less intense shear zones and therefore spreading out the mixing zone resulting in a gentler energy exchange and less noise. Fuel Efficiency - The job of the engine is to produce thrust. When thrust exceeds drag the aircraft accelerates. At cruise, thrust = drag. Thrust comes from increasing the momentum (mass flow rate X change in velocity) of the air flow. Fuel requirements are driven by energy considerations however, not momentum. Jet fuel is a storage medium for energy and is about 43Mj/Kg. Kinetic energy of the flow is (1/2 X mass flow X velocity squared). So, if we want an engine that produces say 1000 units of thrust, we can chose a low air flow rate/high airflow speed change solution (turbojet) or a high airflow rate/low airflow speed change solution (turbofan). But in either case, the fuel flow will be proportional to the kinetic energy change of the flow. So, suppose we want 1,000 units of thrust. We could choose a turbojet engine that processes 250 units of air flow and accelerates it 4 units of speed. Multiplying those parameters for momentum change/thrust we get 250 x 4 = 1,000 units of thrust and for kinetic energy change we get 2,000 units (0.5 X 250 X 4 X 4). Now we choose a turbofan engine that can process 500 units of air flow and accelerate it 2 units of speed. Multiplying again for momentum/thrust we have 500 X 2 = 1,000 units of thrust. However, the kinetic energy change required is now 0.5 X 500 X 2 X 2 = 1,000 units of kinetic energy...half of what the turbojet would require for the same thrust. In practice we can't get all that improvement and the resulting turbofan engine will be more complex, heavier and more expensive, but you can easily see why engineers pursue them!

@rosita470

Your videos are genuinely entertaining, keep it up

@retiredtom1654

In the mid 1960s I was a jet engine mechanic in the Navy. Your video was well done.

@samrobinson2640

Absolutely fantastic, I work for an aircraft engine manufacturer and this has a far better explanation than any of the courses or literature the company has to offer. Thank you

@aphasic6707

Now i know edactly what i should swap in my Vw Golf

@imlegit69

As a person who loves internal combustion engines in both cars and planes, the fact that you started taking up jet engines too because I finished watching all of your car engine related videos long back is a HUGE win for me! Please continue making videos not just about car engines but also about jet engines. I feel like you dont get as much information in youtube about them as you get in car engines.

@wonko3fc

Your ability to explain complex ideas is unsurpassed sir. Better yet, you also add a little humor but not so much it becomes a distraction. You are an inspiration. Never change.

@mattj65816

This guy is amazing. From maybe three videos on turbine engines, he's (re)taught me 90% of the layman's understanding of turbines that it took me a decade to glean from AgentJayZ videos. No knock on AgentJayZ whatsoever, he just goes into way, way, way more depth. It takes more time to process. The high level view presented here condenses the core principles wonderfully.

@LG-ct8tw

I just can't get enough of your videos! Looking back at my days in school, wishing I had teacher like you.

@umakemerandy3669

12:50 The Losi dirtbike R/C and its 2 counter spinning internal flywheels make it dang near impossible to tip over. This part of the video reminded me of it and similarities to how the engine + wheels affect the bike.

@vicplichota

Well done! Need to add a nitpick regarding gyro "cancellation": counter-rotation can only cancel the precession effects; it does not eliminate the inertia of the spinning rotors.

@magnumfire313

Ok, now we need a vídeo about the chrysler turbine car!