ON JESUS - From Lentulus and Josephus to A.I. and Homo Deus

hi there I have returned to speak today about  uh two very interesting resources first is uh the letter of obus lus to the Senate of  Rome concerning Jesus Christ that has been discovered in the Middle Ages and the second uh  the references of famous Jewish historian Josephus lers to Jesus in his book The Antiquity of the  Jew and what the references I have discovered at a very very superficial investigation on the  internet so first of course we'll return to our dear Wikipedia to see what's the

official uh  authorized opinion about the letter of Ls it's mysterious same as the Shroud uh it appeared uh  around 1460 and was printed in Germany first in the Life of Christ by ludolf the kusian and in the  introduction to the works of St an but according to the manuscript of Jenna the letter was found  in 1421 by a certain jakomo of the Colona family in an ancient Roman document sent to Rome from  Constantinople the yeah the estimation is that it must have been of Greek origin and translated

into  Latin during the 13 or the 14th century but anyway though we have here a 19th century scholar called  Fred who believed that he could trace the letter down to the time of the clis this is generally not  accepted by the present day Scholars as Wikipedia and the letter is frequently regard this as rocal  because let's consider this reasons very important first no governor of Jerusalem or procurator  of Judea is known to have been called lalos that's one and second the Roman Governor would n

ot  have addressed the senate in the way represented however the Deeds of the Divine Augustus the  book of Augustus the Roman Emperor lists Aus lalos as being elected as a Roman Council during  his Reign that ended in 14 ad so we have in fact atilus I have checked for this but anyway let's  see the last argument in support of this idea that it's just apocryphal is not what it pretends to be  the Roman writer cited the Expressions Prophet of Truth sons of men or Jesus Christ the for of two  Hebre

w ideum and the third is taken from the New Testament they see all right so let's see what the  letter tells us about Jesus because it's about his um physical portrait and also his a psychological  assessment so to say yeah so let's see here it says without any other introduction lentus the  governor of the jerusalemites to the Roman senate and people greetings there has appeared in our  times and there still lives a man of great power virtue called Jesus CHR Christ the people call  him Prophet

of Truth his disciples Son of God he raises the dead and heals infirmities he's a man  of medium size he has a venerable aspect and his beholders can both fear and love him his hair is  of the color of the ripe h on not straight down to the ears but below the ears wavy and curled  with a bluish and bright reflection flowing over his shoulders it is parted two on the top of the  head after the pattern of the nazarin his brow is smooth and very cheerful with a face without  wrinkle or spot embelli

shed by a slightly reddish complexion his nose and mouth are faultless his  beard is abundant of the color of his hair not long but divided at the chin his aspect is simple  and mature his eyes are blue gray and bright he's terrible in his reprimands sweet and amiable in  his admonitions cheerful without loss of gravity he was never known to laugh but often to we his  sture is straight his hands and arms beautiful to behold his conversation is grave infrequent  and modest he is the most beautifu

l among the children of man so here we have a translation  of course it sounds very impressive also it is in agreement with what we know from the new  revelation in Gifts of heaven where I have read the portrait that the Lord himself gives  us about him it also appears to converge with a portraits given in the archal volume coming  from the high priest gal coming from pontious pilate and as it says here this description agrees  with a so-called abgar descript destion of Jesus as well as the desc

ription of Jesus given by  nerus kalistus and John Damas and the Book of painters of Mount AOS so there are various other  sources we spoke about this description from the letters of abgarus and we spoke about the book  concerning the correspondence between Jesus and aaras that can be found among the books of the new  revelation in the previous video about the look of Jesus so anyway let's see another reference here  on Wiki wand where it is observed that yeah in the Deeds of Augustus indeed the

re must be a quotation  about puus lus has been elected as Roman Council during this reign of Augustus ending in 14 ad  and yeah I have found on the internet archive this book the DS of the Divine Augustus which is  well recognized by Wikipedia yeah it's mainly a professional biography of the emperor so it was  completed just one month before the emperor's death although the content says here was written  years earlier and went through various revisions and here it is the document on internet ar

chive  and we can see here page 56 is written by the hand of the emperor beginning with that year in which  NEOS and pablus Lantus were con so when the posts failed I furnished Aid sometimes to 100,000 men  and sometimes to More by supplying grain or money for the tribute from my own land and property  now I cannot give you very many additions to this there is a transcription in Latin and one in  Greek but then it continues with other details so I don't know exactly when this happened in time  b

ut for sure this happened before 14 ad so most probably it happened during the life of Our  Lord this is the page of Augustus on Wikipedia But though we have this uh reference that is  not studied enough we'll see that many other resources such as Orthodox Wiki I believe belongs  to the Christian Orthodox Church's references on Wikipedia about the letter of Lantus it's said  an allegedly apocryphal and pigal letter and as arguments that it is so we can find exactly what  was an Wikipedia about n

ot having any paus Lantos as the governor of Judea preceding ponus violate  because before him it was valerious gratus and I have checked this appears to be valid on Wikipedia  we have this pontious patus and valerious gratus and here is the little that you can find about him  in Wikipedia but to me the dates are not really reliable it's just mainly one referen to Josephus  and if you look carefully into this huge book about the Antiquity of the Jews you won't find  many chronological references

but anyway let's go back to the Orthodox argument if there had been  a procurator of Syria not a governor he would have written to the emperor not to the Senate right so  this is somehow an inference and the title again same as in Wikipedia the title Jesus Christus was  not used as early as this well the Expressions Prophet of Truth and Sons of men are Hebrew ideom  so being Hebrew ideom they may be forbidden to be used by the Romans I suppose isn't it yeah the  Catholics on the other side if y

ou look here on the newadvent.org declare this as clearly vague  because as they say public slenis is a fictitious person said to have been governor of Judea before  ponus so there's absolutely no reference to the book of uh Emperor Augustus and uh yeah in  the presentation it's starts again with ltil the governor of the jerusalemites to the Roman  senate and people greetings so this tradition is uh very much similar to that on Wikipedia  another Catholic research Catholicism academic dictionari

es and encyclopedias it's exactly the  same as the previous fictitious person being paus lalos said to be governor of Judea before  ponus right and the text appears to be similar the same presentation ltil is the governor of the  jerusalemites to the Roman senate and here's a a short history and we can see that uh what we can  find on Wikipedia corresponds almost literally with this uh we can find also some Evangelical  references you see words events and the Bible proclaiming loud and clear tha

t the description of  Jesus letter is a Hax updated a year ago and here the Au Brandon wart speaks about the discovery  of this uh description of uh Jesus coming from the so-call Pao cantos and adds to this that the  famous Christian scholar Dr Edgar G Goodspeed has debunked this yeah I have mentioned Dr goodeed  here he is real Theologian and Professor scholar of Greek and the New Testament who also  seemingly debunked the archco volume yeah with very few words in fact yeah in his famous  book

modern Apocrypha it seems he deals with 16 famous biblical hes and among them is this  description of Jesus he says the description appears in the longer form of a letter from pus  Lantos governor of Judea to the Roman senate yeah this is in medieval manuscripts and gives us  the letter without the presentation of the author as governor and he says it is probably as old as  the 13th century but it was unknown to Christian Antiquity and has no claims to Serious attention  as throwing any light up

on the personal appearance of Jesus yeah it's not a very scientific assess  M same as the one given to the archo volume of course not even the best Theologian in the world  cannot be aware of everything that has been published during Christian Antiquity considering  that we are left with just a fraction of the production of Christian Antiquity obviously  and also that there's a lot in the library of Vatican and you know other more or less secret  libraries that has not been disclosed to the publ

ic or even to the world of the scholars but  any way this uh fellow treats Dr Goods speed as if he's the master of artificial intelligence  I don't know representative of God on Earth because according to him there's no record to this  absolutely nothing copies are in the Congressional library in Washington DC but they say they  have no such letters and that's kind of all the argument so that's our Evangelical uh resource  and then we have another one which is also very very interesting in fact

it's not an Evangelical  one but is one from the academic environment the University of North Carolina press and here we  have in matters of religion the book of Edward G Blum and Paul Harvey white Jesus and the publ PL  to us letter yeah because having a white Jesus has become a huge problem today and as it says here  in America His Image as a white man has been used both to justify the atrocities of white supremacy  and to inspire the righteousness of civil rights Crusades right so we have thi

s book called the  color of Christ the son of God and the Saga of race in America so we move this underground of  political correctness and uh yeah we attribute to God all the sins of the so-called Christians  again I would dearly direct you to the book called 12 hours you can find it here again this is the  Lord's website the new revelation here you can find an internet archive if you click this the new  revelation of Jesus Christ CHR it will open this here are all the books of the new revelati

on  translated in English and you can download 12 hours but you can look in all the books of the  new revelation and see that the Lord Jesus Christ doesn't promote any kind of racism but Universal  love for all human beings all human beings are his children they all have a Divine spirit of  God and in fact the Lord is very very upset with the false hypocritical Christians who turn  on their brothers because they are weaker than them they have another color of skin have another  culture even they

have another religion this is absolutely judged and discouraged by the Lord so  yeah returning here we see that a stumbling block that is dealt within this research is is the paus  lenus letter which is significant and by the way here it says that was written sometime between  the 11th and the 15th century which is a bit in disagreement with the assessment of Professor  good speed that it would be most probably from the 13th century so they give us a a bigger wrench  but they say here also that

claim to come from Guess him a Roman proc consel during the time of  Crisis suddenly is not not a government but he's a pro consel and by the way we know that there is a  reference to a Roman counil in the book of Emperor Augustus the Deeds of Augustus yeah but obviously  this reference is not given here and then they say the most fascinating thing about the letter is  that before the Civil War just about everyone knew that it was a fraud there's no references  to this it's just a general asses

sment you know anecdotal whenever Americans discussed it and  when we speak about Americans the example given is the president of Y University asra Styles they  admitted that it was a fake and that the Bible said nothing of what Jesus look like right that's  one thing that the Bible doesn't say anything and it's different from the letter being a fake again  you see the kind of language that always tries to create the impression that the assertion is  generally accepted this is not science and th

is is not history because obviously there have always  been various opinions and even uh Wikipedia gives us other opinions about this and you you'll see  that many people have believed in this and then it says here but then between the Civil War and  the Great Depression white Americans transformed it into a believed truth they started referencing  it as a fact starting making visual imagery based upon its description and began claiming that it  proved that the white race was Supreme because God

made it that way well sorry but in the previous  video about the look of Jesus we had a chance to look at a number of very old icons including one  from the 4th Century in which Jesus is depicted as a Caucasian man and kind of most of the the first  icons were portraying him as white sometimes even blonde you know so yeah it wasn't the Americans  after the Civil War that started presenting the Lord Jesus Christ as a white man that's for  sure but guess who contradicted this it was the civil rig

hts movement that convinced Americans  intellectually the Jesus could not have been white yeah so they needed to be intellectually convinced  like they these days based on artistic depictions or using old Israeli schulls that Middle Eastern  person 2,000 years ago couldn't have been white right but the artwork inspired by the public  L letter has continued to inspire people very unfortunately yeah so now in matters of the other  arguments used in Wikipedia in regards to the letter being apocryph

al the use of Jesus Christ  at that time is a problem so it appears as during the Lord's lifetime he was not called Christ  or Jesus Christ or Jesus the Christ so I have opened the the great Gospel of John as I told you  you can find all the books here on the internet archive and let's say just the mainly the first  volume although I looked in half of them but let's speak about the first volume which is here great  Gospel of John in this translation you get 25 books so this is the first of them

and look what  I have found here right we have Jesus presented as Christ in the great Gospel of John starting with  the very first volume so what we have here are sins that correspond perfectly with verses of the  Gospel of John the biblical one and of the other gospels also but let's say we have John 1 12-28  because that's what the translators have put here but obviously for what we have from the known  gospels you will see here an entire scene and of course with a much more developed language

  so you can understand better what happened in a quite cinematic manner so here is the scene  when John the Baptist denies that he is Christ The Promised Messiah so you can say that this has  been written you know the biblical Gospel of John has been written after the Lord's death on Earth  the the appears that the scholars consider this to be the truth the new revelation of great Gospel of  John makes pretty clear that John has been taking notes about uh the Lord's life and teaching during  th

is three years of missionary work of the Lord in which he was close to him as a disciple and uh  here we have the real words as they are presented by the Lord the real words and facts happening  at the time not afterwards so what it says here is that John said so you see the verse in the  scripture is John answered them saying I baptize only with water he the Christ about whom you are  asking he's standing among you but you do not know him and what he really said was but John said I  baptize onl

y with water which means I wash hearts that have become unclean for a worthy reception  of the one who as it were has been in your midst already for quite some time but whom you do not  recognize because of your blindness here also this is the Lord speaking all those who seek me the  Lords somewhere outside are are represented by The emissaries Who travel over lands and seas  asking all the sages where is Christ when and where will he be coming the true one who build  a dwelling place for himsel

f in their hearts and who can be found only there all these deluded  Seekers him they do not seek at least not at the only place where he must be sought and can be  found further on corresponding to verse 39 in John chapter many Samaritans of that City came to  believe in him initially because of the woman's testimony that's the woman at the well about whom  we find a lot of things in uh this first volume of the great Gospel of John her name was irel  so the Lord says here in the new revelation

for there were some among them among the Samaritans  who were well versed in the scripture they said this one speaks like David who says the Lord's  decrees are true and righteous everyone more to be desired than gold pure gold in plenty sweeter  than syrup or honey from the C my desire is to do thy will Lord and thy law is in my heart in the  great assembly I have proclaimed what is right I do not hold back my words as you know oh Lord I  have not kept thy goodness hidden in my heart I have pro

claimed thy faithfulness and saving power  and not concealed thy unfilling love and truth from the great assembly so that was a quotation  that these people were able to give but we know said the Samaritans and that is our witness full  of Truth and power that he who thus speaks and acts as before him David spoke and acted and that  in his name is truly the promised Messiah until this one after David no one has spoken and acted  like David therefore this one must unfailingly be the Christ the an

oint Ed of God from eternity  therefore we will wholly accept him so this can be found in the great Gospel of John book 1 chapter  31 in the same book corresponding to John chapter 4 verse 25 says the woman that's the woman at the  well your I know that the Messiah is coming who will be called to Christ when he comes he will  surely tell us everything that you have not told me so what is she saying in fact this we find  in the great Gospel of John book 1 chapter 28 now the woman her cheeks still

flushed says with  great emotion Lord you wisest prophet of God I do know that the promised Messiah is to come and  that his name will be Christ when he comes will he not be able to Proclaim to us only what you have  now told me right so we find Christ again again from book 1 chapter 42 which is called Sermon on  the Mount clearly explained by Nathaniel we know he is one of the Lord's disciples he's speaking  here with the high priest replies Nathaniel are you of such a closed mind that you can

not grasp  a clearly given teaching in its true sense have not practically all the prophets predicted that  Christ would open his mouth to speak to the people only in parables says the high priest yes you  are right that is how it is written and further on in chapter 46 which is called return at sear  cleaning of a leper we see how the high priest was converted by this miracle the high priest was  also greatly astonished and said if a doctor had told me look I am going to cure this man I would 

have only laughed and said oh you fool go to the you TR this and try to bail it out each bucket  full drone will be replaced by a 100,000 however it should still be easier for you to drain  the Euphrates than to restore Health to this man whose flesh has already begun to decompose  and the man whom we have now recognized as the Messiah managed to do this with a single word in  truth this suffices us he is definitely Christ we do not need any further proof and further  on following these words he

runs to me that is close to the well Falls at my feet and says Lord  do you stop just for a moment that I may worship you for you are not only Christ a Son of God but  God himself clothed In the Flesh with us this is absolutely amazing because it's a recognition that  many of the Apostles still didn't have have at this time but this converted Pharisee really had  and is given here in book one so I hope right now it's pretty clear that the term Christ was used  at the time when the Lord was livi

ng in the flesh according to the great Gospel of John the direct  word of the Lord in which he presents exactly what has been spoken and what has happened during this  uh three years before his crucifixion of course not everything but the most relevant things for  the new Christianity that will start after his second coming yeah right now we have uh discussed  the arguments of this letter being apocryphal and we have found that there was a pantus indeed and  most of these uh resources that deem

the letter to be fraudulent do not quote this the Deeds of the  Divine Augustus of the Roman emperor that mentions paus lentus as a Roman Council yeah and also the  fact that Jesus Christ was used at that time as for Prophet of Truth and Sons of men I think these  the so-called Hebrew idioms are quite natural Expressions so really doesn't sound like a like an  argument and let's consider also that this is very much in agreement with the portrait from the new  revelation the gifts of heaven and a

lso the ones given in the arch volume by Gia and pous pilot so  yeah we also have a very important uh reference of uh flavus Josephus about Jesus in his book The  Antiquities of the Jews written in the first century around 9394 ad and they say here there in  fact two references to this there's one in book 18 stating that Jesus was the Messiah it's commonly  called the testimonium flavianum and there's another one in book 20 chapter 9 mentioning the  brother of Jesus who was called Christ whose n

ame was James which is true according to the Bible  and the new revelation the great Gospel of John and the childhood of Jesus so we see a first use  of the name Christ referring to Jesus here and as far as the testimonium flavianum is concerned the  statement is here in Translation about this time there lived Jesus A wise man if indeed one or  to call him a man for he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people  as accept the truth gladly he won over many Jews and ma

ny of the Greeks he was the Christ and when  upon the accusation of the principal men Among Us pilate had condemned him to a cross those who had  first come to love him did not cease he appeared to them spending a third day restored to life for  the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other Marvels about him and the tribe  of the Christians soall after him has still to this day not disappeared so this is said to be not  necessarily an authentic paragraph so nothing else in t

his book is challenge but this testimony  concerning Jesus is a matter of contention and what they give us here in Wikipedia is three  perspective on authenticity according to these two authors one is entirely authentic two is entirely  a Christian forgery three it contains Christian interpolations in what was Joseph's authentic  material about Jesus and we have Arguments for complete authenticity and we see that until the  rise of modern criticism many scholars believed that this was nearly or

completely authentic with  little or no so-called Christian interpolations But Here Comes the paraphrase model appearing  in 2022 and there are Arguments for Christian interpolations there are internal arguments there  are external arguments arguments from Silence because this is not mentioned by certain authors  right they have found similar testimonials that lack the Christian terminology and so on there  a lot written about this isn't it so now if they take out the so-called three divisive el

ements  that he was the Christ though we see that the other reference to the brother of Jesus show us  Jesus as the Christ anyway right is should to is it lawful to call him a man which may suggest his  divinity right and the reference to Resurrection the result is the following now there was about  this time Jesus wise man for he was a doer of startling Deeds a teacher of such men as received  the trust with pleasure and he gain the following both among many Jews and many of Greek origin and  w

hen pilate at the suggestion of the principal man amongst us condemned him to the Cross those that  loved him at the first did not forsake Him and the tribe of Christians so named from him are not  extinct at this day and with this they are happy and Jesus is a simple Sage a wise man of the Jews  he was not Divine he was not the Son of God he was not resurrected and yeah but this argument  makes him acceptable to almost any other faith and religion especially Islam isn't it and also  the stal wh

ich doesn't recognize Jesus Divinity obviously in reality what we can find here in  the Antiquities of the Jews translated by William Winston sounds a bit uh different let me see  that's the fragment uh referring to the brother of Jesus Jesus who was called Christ finally here  in chapter 3 from book 18 called the sedition of the Jews against Pontius Pilate concerning Christ  and what beel Paulina and the Jews at Rome we can find here now there was about this time Jesus A  wise man if it be lawf

ul to call him a man for he was a doer of wonderful Works a teacher of such  men as received the truth with pleasure he drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of  the Gentiles he was the Christ and when pilate at the suggestion of the principal man amongst  us had condemned him to the Cross those that loved him at the first did not forsake Him for he  appeared to them alive again the third day as the Divine Prophet had foretold these and 10,000 other  wonderful things concerning him and

the tribe of Christians so named from him are not extinct  at this day right so coming back to this uh perspectives on authenticity this author Paul Meer  states that the first case I mean being entirely authentic is generally seen as hopeless very  scientific language given that as a Jew Josephus would not have claimed Jesus as the Messiah let's  remember this and that the second option is hardly tenable given the presence of the passage in all  extent Greek manuscripts thus a large majority o

f modern Scholars accept the third alternative  partial authenticity so they cannot to really spread the idea that is entirely a Christian  forgery in fact this is the only challenge in this work of Josephus but they just suggest some  some intrusions say they Su just about the entire Bible and the gospel so there's nothing new about  anything let's see why would Joseph as a Jew not claim Jesus as the Messiah what's the deal with  Josephus flavus Josephus first sounds very Roman to me isn't it s

o here we find out that he was a  Roman Jewish historian and military leader and if you look at his history although he first fought  the Roman Empire he defected completely to the Roman s after the 67 ad when he was surrender  to the Roman army and he was made a prisoner and then during the reign of vpan Reign who he  predicted was granted his freedom and assume his family name of flavus and from then on he became  a Roman citizen an advisor and friend of Vespasian son Titus and even cooperated

with them during  the famous Siege of Jerusalem when Jerusalem was destroyed yeah as a translator so now what is with  him being faithful to the Jewish tradition not acknowledging Jesus as the Messiah in 94 because  he wrote the book Antiquities of the Jews in 94 and that's a quarter of a century after he went  to Rome yeah and 24 years after he became a Roman citizen it even seems that his original audience  may not have been primarily the Jews because he's explaining basic judian language cus

toms and  laws which indicate an eventual Gentile audience it says here that was very popular writer with  Christians in the fourth century and beyond as an independent witness to the events before during  and after the life of Jesus of Nazareth and on the Jewish side Josephus was far more obscure as he  was perceived as a traitor we can understand why so definitely this argument of uh PA Meyer that  Josephus as a Jew would not have claimed Jesus as the Messiah is very weak yeah but let's just s

tick  with this thing because it is of the greatest importance to observe how all these sources  that affirm the Divinity of Christ you know are very much under assault today you know and coming  particularly from so-called Christian theologians and let's uh remember the incredible number of  translations of the Bible that we can find today you know that we have discussed a bit about  uh this in another video and see that from uh older ones like King James and Geneva Bible to the  so-called the

message or the voice very new ones which resemble very little with the Bibles you  know with the scriptures now um so everything is debatable on one side is this is the way it should  be it's a period of immense spiritual fermentation but on the other side there is a tendency which  can be detected of obscuring the authors and The Works which EMP EMP iiz the reality of the  Christian gospels and of the Divinity of the Lord and of his Supernatural resurrection of his  atonement and Redemption of

humanity so there is a suppression of this sources and a promotion of  those who present the Lord as just a prophet or just a wise man or an activist or a person of a  local cultural importance and eventually even a mythological creation look here we have a variety  of resources on YouTube in which the issue of the existence of uh Jesus is brought over this uh is  a Channel with a a huge audience and in this talk this testimonium flanum from the Antiquities of  the juice is given but of course u

h as problematic and not uh necessarily as we have read in the  document you know we also find a quotation of tud a mentioning of the agnostic Gospels found at nag  hamadi in 1945 a mentioning of the Gospel of uh Thomas which is also a gnostic one in which you'll  find no crucifixion it has nothing to do within new revelation also you find references to other  religions such as and Islam in which again find the figure of Jesus as a remarkable man a great  prophet but not as a Son of God or God a

s a Divine person incarnate with a mission to atone for the  sins of people and bring Redemption and nothing about his resurrection and finally it says that  the Scholar's consensus is that Jesus existed but uh yeah merely as a historical man here there's  another similar video did Jesus really desist a historical investigation from the history Hub and  here they start speaking about the perspective of the Quran which appeared 600 years later so it  seems in which obviously kind of everybody kno

ws that Jesus was the prophet that preceded Muhammad  and uh then they give us PL the younger which in 112 ad spoke about uh the Christians the followers  of uh Christ he was not among them obviously they speak about the pilot Stone you know as uh the  main artifact that testifies about the existence of pontious pilot which is contradicted by the  way in Wikipedia's page about uh viot because it appears that he is one of the most documented  procurators Roman procurators of Judea and then it spe

aks about uh the opposers of uh Christianity  bringing such arguments as a lack of writings concerning Jesus at his time so yeah if you  don't consider this letter of Lantus or the arch volume for example there is a lack of writings  then another argument would be that there have been in other religions mythological Heroes with  similar lives we know that this has been presented a lot in New Age books and in lectures such as um  those of David A's arguments against Christianity but they are expl

ained in the new revelation  because all these uh prophets or initiates in religions that came before Christianity were in  fact precursors of the Lord so each one of them was meant to more or less symbolize the Lord and  his uh Destiny so it it is a a spiritual ancestry so to say and further on another argument would  be the inconsistencies and differences between uh the accounts of Jesus lives that we can find in  scriptural gospels and if you read the uh Gifts of Heaven I think it's in volume

three again you  can find them here the gifts of Heaven I think it's here in volume three you can find a lot about  these Mysteries of the gospels uh we'll probably speak about this also what is the source of these  inconsistencies but yeah obviously they can be explained from both psychological spiritual and  historic perspective and all of them are touched by the Lord in the gifts of heaven but the idea  is that all of them are practically endorsed by the Lord and made to harmonize which I do

n't think  any human brain could have done so here's another video from Metatron another Mega Channel called  is Jesus historical what do the Romans say about him and yeah this um Young man is quoting uh a  number of uh Roman sources that are referring to Christians in general and not Christ generally in  a negative way he speaks about gonus trilles plen the younger that we discussed about Lucian of  samosata who also mocks the Christians marabar sarapion of Syria it speaks about the Destiny of 

the people that commit sins against their leaders and particularly the Jews who had been driven  out after killing their King you know obviously the king could have been just the the Lord also  he mentions the uh Jewish talmud who presents a completely different story about the Jesus and  you know says that he was uh hanked for sorcery and enticing the Israelite people about the  apostasy and that happened on Eve of pass over 40 days after publishing this through Messengers  across the country

so uh an eventual uh defender of uh Jesus would appear which didn't happen  obviously so these are the resources mentioned here and yeah this um young man believes that uh  the Romans would have never believed somebody else like Jesus that his um birth uh would have meant  nothing but this is quite funny because if you read the childhood of Jesus you discovered that uh  important Roman figures like Sirius and Cornelius who were often Imperial descendants were close  to the Lord even from the tim

e of his uh infancy and later on there's other important figures such  as uh gria Captain Julius marus SP and many other Romans who have been converted to the Lord's U  teaching and indeed much easier than many Jews so that's to understand that it wasn't just Jews  converted Jews that have imported Christianity to Rome and generally to the vast Roman Empire but  the Romans themselves and some of them with huge Authority right but definitely he doesn't know  anything about the new revelation and

probably would not be at all concerned about it this is  uh Paul Williams who has given up Christianity for Islam I don't know if he's a theologian or  a professor but he's got a very big audience too and he explains here that Jesus was not crucified  according to First century Christians and guess what the argument is that Bishop ignacius of  Antioch also made Saint afterwards complains that there are some Christians that deny that Jesus has  died on the cross but yeah we know that because even

at that time there were already Gnostic  Gospels in which uh Jesus was viewed as a great teacher as a prophet eventually but just a human  being and obviously the supernatural Resurrection was not confirmed I would just suggest yeah  here is his uh story it's an interesting matter of Theology and you know the meaning of Trinity  which gets the full answer and explanation in the new revelation God is just one it's not three  different persons so the Son of God is in fact God himself in his aspec

t as wisdom the father is  the love of God uh or the essential aspect of God and the Holy Spirit is the manifestation of the  power the will of God and they are all three in one that's why the Lord said the father is in me  and I am in the father practically the spirit in Jesus is the Father the Eternal essential love  in God that is ruling the entire creation and I would just suggest that maybe somebody who's  interested in this uh problem of uh Islam and the differences in the way Jesus is pre

sented in  Islam as being just a prophet could be definitely interesting to watch some presentations of Dr J  Smith in which he brings a lot of in my view a lot of compelling arguments why the historicity  of um this religion is very much debatable and there's a variety of uh resources and a lot of uh  contradictions also but the reality is that these days you know the contradictions in the gospels  are also becoming more and more stumbling block especially in social media but even so they canno

t  both be true so either you have the old variant of the gospels in which Jesus was God incarnated he  died on the cross you know the Nan Creed where you have the new Jesus of the Quran who was a Muslim  same as all the other prophets and Patriarchs before him and who preached obedience to God and  didn't die on the cross and was not resurrected so you cannot have both the new revelation as we  know obviously supports and confirms and expands this Christianity of the scripture gospel so um  yea

h of course there are other variants about uh Jesus like uh this uh taken from the urania  book you know that was created between 1924 and 1955 seemingly through mediumistic channeling  but anyway the important thing is that uh here this uh Jesus is not of course the Jesus of  the gospels there are some similarities was both human and divine the Son of God incarnate  so this is a bit better than in Islam that he performed many of the Miracles described in the  Bible and so on he taught the 12 ap

ostles he was crucified then he rose from the dead he will  return to the world again someday but on the other hand this crucifixion is not considered an  atonement for the sins of humanity is thought to be an outcome of the fears of religious leaders  of the day right so doesn't have a spiritual meaning Jesus is considered a human incarnation  of Michael of nebadon so definitely he is not the second person of Trinity or God incarnate Jesus  was born on Earth through natural means did not walk o

n water yeah so the most important thing  is that he is not God incarnate and his spiritual mission is not recognized and as we can find here  there's many other interesting things such as Jesus is the creator of the local Universe not of  everything that exists and by the way as a coequal female partner something like a wife isn't it yeah  but after all this I would also recommend this U Jesus outside the Bible the top 10 historical  references presented by Brian Windle and he starts speaking a

bout uh the Christian writers  from the first century that confirm the gospel you know obviously and then moves on to non-Christian  sources authors such as fagon quoted by origin in 140 ad thus from ad 55 quoted by Julius africanas  later on celsus quoted by origin in 175 Lucian of samosata we mentioned this before in 166 ad  all these obviously are against Christians 73 ad marab bar sarapan yeah we spoke about this  about the Jews killing their King 112 ad P the younger 120 ad SW tonus and fin

ally 93 ad flavius  Josephus and they mention the disputed testimonium flavianum and I want to give you exactly what he  is saying about the testimonium flavianum because what he's saying about testimonium flavianum is  that indeed the known translations may be a matter of contention but they found I think an Arabic  version which seems to be more acceptable let's listen to him one of our favorite historians is  flavius Josephus uh he had something to say about Jesus and if so what is it Brian y

eah and this is  a bit of a controversial passage well one of them is uh Josephus actually mentions Jesus twice in  his work the um the Antiquities of the Jews and writing at the end of the first century um he  is describing um describes Jesus in particular now there is a controversial passage um that it's  called the testimonium flavinium and and it almost all Scholars Christians and non-christians believe  that it was um it was edited by a later Christian scribe to make Jesus look really good

but there  was a copy found that did not have those edits in it probably the what was originally written by  Josephus it was discovered in 1970 it's an Arabic version and it is the kind of thing that a Jew  like Josephus might write about Jesus it says this at that time there was a wise man who was called  Jesus his conduct was good and he was known to be virtuous and many people from among the Jews  and other nations became his disciples pilate condemned him to be crucified and to die but those

  who had become his disciples did not abandon his discipleship they reported that he had appeared  to them uh three days after his crucifixion and that he was alive accordingly he was perhaps  the Messiah concerning whom the prophets have recounted wonders historian Paul Meyer notes  clearly this version of the passage is expressed in a manner appropriate to a non-Christian Jew  and it corresponds almost precisely to previous scholarly projections of what Josephus actually  wrote and so um this

is important but Josephus actually referred to Jesus a second time when he  talks about the death of James quote the brother of Jesus who was called Christ and so from these  references we know that Josephus accepted the existence of Jesus historically who was called  Christ his conduct was good he was crucified by pilate many people came as disciples and reported  that he was alive after his death yeah yeah yeah so since he admittedly uh use the term Christ for  Jesus me there's no problem to

allow Christ to to stay in the context you know right because what  they have taken was the he was the Christ isn't it they say he was probably the Messiah anyway  anyway I wish recommend this video especially because these days due to the generalized  confusion people try to find shorter ways to discover the universal truth of all things look  at this 1 million view I mean and what it says is what AI said about Jesus and the end of the world  will shock you yeah this is CH GPT that she asked ab

out Jesus and the of the world and is about Elon  musk's brain chip about AI in itself and you know the Advent of false prophets about the revelation  of John the mark of the beast and the surveillance system so it appears to be very consistent with  the opinions of many Evangelical people and not only Evangelical that try to you know find some  some correspondences between the terms and the events described in the revelation of John and  what they see it's happening today in our world of weirdn

ess and confusion so it's nothing else  nothing different than this uh perspective in the end it's easily digestable by these Christians  however the new revelation doesn't confirm this Mark of the Beast I have spoken about this in  know couple of uh presentations the mark of the beast is the mark of Satan which is pride  or selfishness and from this perspective it's spiritual and psychological and the people  who adhere to this in their minds in their intellectual Pride or in their deeds they a

re  Guided by this sinful Pride are the ones who are marked the rest are just applications in real life  and of course technology in itself is absolutely dead although there are various opinions here my  view whatever AI is bringing is though they say it's creative it's whatever you put in it there's  no creativity and by the way we have a portrait of Jesus from AI that used a quotation from Isaiah  where was this Isaiah 53 which is as we know from the new revelation spiritual language speaking 

about the Lord and his passion that he was uh despised and esteemed not he was tricken afflicted  and uh there was no beauty that we should desire him and based on this taken literally as the  Christians like to do generally and worship the letter and adding some various anthropological  details we will see that be sorry but that hair I mean it's great for a romance book cover but  it's so impractical for a fisherman and that's not to mention that the first depictions of Jesus  in historical ar

t had his hair short also short hair was favored and even encouraged by Jesus's  apostles in the New Testament so it makes sense that a shorter crop would have been the dude that  did the job so to speak okay so it's better but he's supposed to be a Middle Eastern right so I  don't think the blue eyes let's swap those out okay that's that's a little better but still his  skin is so white right I mean Jesus wasn't white you know that right Jesus Jesus wasn't white I  mean he wasn't white ethnical

ly but also people of his time were basically outside under the sun  all the time so his skin would be a pretty dark complexion and for that matter his features  would be much more Eastern Mediterranean and in addition he would look older than the modern  33y old and that's because we spend a lot of time inside not under the Sun but being constantly  sunbaked has that effect on your epidermis so okay that that feels more accurate I think  we're getting there but we're still not quite there yet n

ow I know this might be a bit of a  shock but balding among Jewish men has a tendency to set in a little younger than some other ethnic  populations it's researched you can look it up so I'm not saying that Jesus was bald for sure but  by 33 it's reasonable to think that Jesus might have had some nail pattern baldness setting now  here's the kicker and right so yeah we also have to remember that in those days there weren't  so many poisons around you know people were not injected irradiated ther

e were no chemicals in  Foods water was generally drinkable the nature was not polluted with nanop particles but anyway yeah  that's the result the wonderful omnicient AI gives us according to this gu's input that's what you  can get there's no spirit in technology obviously I mean you can try to simulate everything but not  the Living spirit of God that cannot be reproduced honey so anyway we have this the Apostle of the  new Humanity homo deos you all knowah Harari everybody knows him and he a

lso seems to be  quite confused from my point of view I mean yeah he either endorses uh AI for example here as  a matter of fact he says that I could start the next big religion because of course until now all  the scriptures were written by human beings but we need something that is superhuman and what is  superhuman is just one thing AI much smarter than humans because besides intelligence of course  there's nothing that matters but on the other hand other things matter to him too or at least 

that's what he's saying he describes Christianity becoming popular as an accident of nature of  course in the perspective of atheists uh you know everything in reality you know up to human  consciousness love everything is an accident it could have been totally different this is in fact  is not substantiated in real science but anyway he's a historian and a philosopher he believes  that U humans have no soul they're hackable animals you know and Bible and Jesus are fake news  yeah and if the Bi

ble is fake news and AI can do a better Bible yeah of course he would endorse this  on the other hand he also wants people about AI you know he wants people about this technology  that can hack them you know biologically intellectually that can control people but  everything is unavoidable Ai and the useless class or the useless cerss which is obviously  very very dangerous he also Envision a future in which Humanity will be extinct in fact there is  a chapter at the end of his book sapience whi

ch is about the extinction of humanity because of course  the new race the superhumans homo deos will appear and this will be as a result of this influx of  the biotechnology and AI the fourth Industrial Revolution when you know finally people will take  their Destiny into their own hands so that's where we are heading and this is not as strange as it  may be I mean if you look at the comments there you can find that uh many people are rejecting  his uh theory he may not be very appealing but he

doesn't need to be appealing to the masses if  the rulers of the world are endorsing him and and he dictates the path for politicians and the new  authorities of the new world so yeah this is the way we are heading and that's why I think it is  important to look back on all this incredibly important historical and spiritual resources that  today are either denied or ignored and in my very small measure I try to point to them from the  perspective mainly of the new revelation because no matter h

ow much confusion it is spread and the  Lord speaks about confusion as being the spirit of the Antichrist you know that will characterize  this time so no matter how much confusion they will spread the light the flashing of light that  will come from the East to the west from the spiritual World from Heaven to the material world  through the pure Sciences will be impossible to be stopped by any human means Ai and their fourth  Revolution will not be able to stop anything matter in itself is more

or less nothing when  dealing with spiritual Powers Yeah but a lot of damage can be and inflicted and it is inflicted  on people this days biologically psychologically and spiritually because of this great confusion  but I would say just hold on Keep Your Love keep your conscience and your faith because the Lord  is drawing nearer and nearer to each of our hearts and nearer to his most visible appearance not  physical but spiritual that we all change Humanity forever and will save the Earth as

the credle of  the children of God so that was my presentation for today thank you very much and yeah hope to see  you soon God bless all the people of good willll