भारत-कनाडा विवाद में नए खुलासे | Details emerge in India-Canada faceoff

Hello, I’m Ravish Kumar. India has officially declared Canada to be a 'terrorism hub'. India–Canada relations won’t be normal as before until this statement remains in place. No one knows what impact this will have on India–Canada relations, but even today, Canadian PM Justin Trudeau said that there are solid grounds to believe that Indian government agents have killed a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil. This is an incident which is against the foundational principle of the rule of law in our

country. We have an independent judiciary; they have solid processes that will do its job. We demand the Indian Government cooperate in the investigation and allow the truth to come out, Trudeau said. The PM of a country has been making such grave allegations against India, but the Indian Prime Minister is not responding. When this matter has arisen at the Prime Minister level, then why has our PM not responded till now? Today in our video, we will not only discuss this in detail but will also t

ry to understand that Manipur too is in the grips of terrorism, there is complete silence on that, people there have accused even the army of colluding with terrorists there on their letterheads; but UAPA has not been imposed on anyone, there is no uproar about it, but then why have India & lapdog media started singing the same tune on Canada & Khalistan? Further, the way South Delhi MP Ramesh Bidhuri has made uncivilised remarks on an elected Lok Sabha MP Danish Ali, linking him to terrorism

and religion INSIDE the parliament is SHAMEFUL. Such things are now being said in the Parliament. We are making a separate episode on this issue today, so please tune in to our “Ravish Kumar Official” YouTube channel. Here, we will discuss the dual attitude of the government, the BJP, lapdog media and the Hindi states on terrorism. When India called Canada a hub of terrorism, lapdog media anchors started throwing their mouths and punches in the air, as if terming Canada and Pakistan a “terroris

m-hub” is the same thing. Pakistan my not have many allies, but that’s not the case with Canada. Who India calls a terrorist, Canada calls him a “citizen”; Canada's friendly countries deem him to be a citizen, and his killing a serious issue. Please get this difference straight. America, Britain, New Zealand appear standing with Canada, that does not mean these countries have turned against India, but on this particular issue, Canada's friends are with Canada. If India is isolated on an issue, i

t is certainly not some diplomatic triumph for India. Consider this Financial Times report. It states that Biden had raised the issue of Nijjar's murder with PM Modi. The murder happened in Canada, of a Canadian citizen; but the US President Joe Biden raised the issue, that too with PM Modi; is this a diplomatic triumph by any means? Is this an example of India's stature in the global system? Think about it. Canadian PM Trudeau has said that he talked with PM Modi about this during the G20. Is t

his not a serious matter? Is this not a diplomatic debacle that America is complaining to India about an incident in Canada, that too at a conference about something else. World leaders had gathered under the G20 banner, even then Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand raised Nijjar’s murder with India. The FT has written that although the White House has not confirmed this, such things are obviously not easily confirmed. It also states that America did not deem it right to comment on the ma

tter before it became public. It has also been reported via sources that America had provided Canada with evidence on this matter. And Canada has relayed this to India. The newspaper also states that when Canada raised this issue with Modi, other leaders also extended support to Canada after that. So, if we look at this specific incident, India seems to be diplomatically isolated here. This has been concealed in all the ‘analyses’. It is not a good – who would be happy if India is criticised – t

his is not a happy thing; but you cannot decorate your house only with curtains that conceal facts. On this matter, not only Canada, but high-level US officials too are in touch with Indian officials. This is not “via sources”, but US National Security Advisor has said on record that US is in talks with the Canadian & Indian govts. Jake Sullivan, the US NSA, has said in a press conference that US has given no “special exemption” to India on this matter. NO "Special Exemptions" are given to India

. Is this an ordinary matter? So, can America also be dared like lapdog media and the govt. dared Canada? Canada & USA appear on the same page on this issue, but India is only responding to Canada, but not other countries. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Arindam Bagchi or Foreign Minister S Jaishankar have not whispered a line on this aspect as to why other countries are jumping into the fray, this is an India–Canada matter, not Australia or NZ. India may remain mum on the question of interference

, but the US has spoken. What could be a bigger diplomatic debacle than this, the one whose affairs are being intervened (India) remains silent, while the intervener (USA) is justifying the intervention. When the US NSA Jake Sullivan was asked if US interference could impede the matter, he said that irrespective of the country affected, USA will stand up for its principles. The US will rigorously discuss legal and diplomatic measures with friends like Canada, this is his official statement. Now

the question is: will India’s lapdog media dare Canada's friends along with Canada? Jake Sullivan has said clearly that US is with Canada on this issue, he has objected to reports that claim US and Canada have difference of opinion. You must have noticed that “experts” had instantly started saying that other friendly countries have not said anything against India; but exercised caution; but you tell me, that here US has spoken even more forthrightly than Canada, it is speaking in one voice with

and for Canada. Why then is the Indian Foreign Minister not speaking up even now? Is this also because of his “common sense” he cited vis China? Let us tell you again that Jaishankar has said on record that 'China is a big economy. What should I do? 'As a small economy, should I go to war with a big economy? 'This is not a question of reaction or answer, it is a question of common sense", said Jaishankar. His words. So now when US has spoken clearly and cornered India, will the Foreign Minister

use common sense and remain silent or will America be told off the same as Canada? You see, the National Security Advisor is holding a press conference, here the entire whole burden was put on the FM spokesperson's shoulders and the rest of the people have gone behind the scenes. You can't see this; nor is it shown, nor does the lapdog media lets you see it. This comment of the US NSA is extremely serious. Certainly he maintained that India is an important friend and there are good relations, bu

t these platitudes aside, his statement clearly shows that US is keeping its friendship with Canada over India. If you reconsider the humongous G20 posters from the prism of this issue, they take on a different meaning. Just as PM Modi is seen alone on the G20 posters, he has also been isolated diplomatically over this matter. This poster's reality is cruelly debunking PM Modi's diplomacy and foreign policy; why are you all alone? US, UK, Australia and NZ are with Canada, who is with you? It is

also significant that PM Modi has not opened his mouth on this; while Canadian PM has spoken many times. Is this PM Modi's purported 'global influence'? That a PM has been targeting India, but our PM is unable to respond till now. USA is speaking publicly, telling that as soon as Canada spoke, after listening to it, we have also spoken in solidarity. This is friendship. If we look at this issue from the Canadian point of view, India's diplomatic isolation is obvious at the global level. No matte

r how much lapdog media anchors roar that Canada has been called a hub of terrorism, US has kept strong its friendship with Canada and is speaking up for it. No matter how you look at this statement, no matter how you manage the headline, the point is the same. Listen to this video carefully and watch it in its entirety. USA has said that when Canada spoke, they too spoke up. Associate Press has published a report via sources on Sept 20. A US official, on condition of anonymity, has said that Ju

stin Trudeau had taken US President Joe Biden into confidence before giving his statement in Parliament. Trudeau's decision to speak in the Parliament has been seen by the US as his confidence in the allegation. Reuters has reported that America and Canada are jointly investigating Nijjar's murder. Therefore, it is important that Foreign Minister S Jaishankar answers all the questions and gives his response to these published reports. India's NSA Ajit Doval should also speak. Why is he mum? It h

as been reported that Canada's National Security Advisor Jody Thomas visited India in August and September So, it is important that India's NSA should also speak on the issue. When the NSAs of Canada and US have spoken, then why is the Indian NSA silent? Now even the lapdog media anchors have started speaking in a way that if US heard the English translation of their dares, it would be terrified! ;D Quitting Canada, it would support these anchors in fear! In this entire matter, lapdog media is

playing a different game for the Hindi states. It is not asking real questions. Of course, India has denied these allegations and termed Canada's evidence as absurd; despite that, US has trusted Canada more than India and has called for criminal investigation. Another indication of Canada and US coming together comes from a report by Canada's state broadcaster, CBC. CBC has also stated sources that the Canadian government in the Nijjar murder case, has collected a lot of human and signals intell

igence after months-long investigation. This intelligence includes conversations between Indian officials. CBC has stated that intelligencs has not come from Canada alone. Five Eyes is an intelligence alliance between the US, Canada, NZ, UK & Australia. One of its members has also collected information. Who this member is, has not been made public yet. On this member, Reuters quoting Canadian gov. sources has reported that Canada worked intensively with the US on intelligence that Indian agents

may have a hand in Nijjar's murder. CBC has written that Canadian officials visited India many times seeking cooperation. Canada's NSA Jody Thomas visited India for 9 days in August–September. CBC has written that Canadian sources have said that behind closed doors no Indian official denies India's involvement in Nijjar's murder. Of course, it's not necessary to believe all that the Canadian public broadcaster says. But it can surely be asked: such severe things are being said; Why is the NSA no

t responding? Why is the Foreign Minister not responding? Canadian PM has himself made the allegations, then why is the Indian PM not giving a response? A lot is being said by Indian lapdog media and the Canadian media. The only difference is that what Canada has said, the US has backed, so now the government must speak up at the highest levels. The FM or the NSA and indeed the PM should step forward. Canadian PM Trudeau said after the UN General Assembly on Thursday that the decision to raise t

hese allegations in the Canadian Parliament was not hasty. This was done after a lot of deliberation. Many experts have written that t his is not good for India's image, whereas in the mindset of the IT cell, it is being seen as the bravery of action on someone else's turf. But at the global level, India is facing more loss on this incident because this is not India's record that it orders killings on foreign soil. Historically, India's stand has been that no one should interfere in our internal

affairs and we too shall not interfere with another's sovereignty. Till now only Pakistan made such allegations against India, that's why there's so much incredulousness in this matter. So, don't jump into this matter in a hurry, listen to every small thing carefully read elsewhere, and also watch this entire video. On September 19, journalist Sushant Singh tweeted that In this video, we also want to talk about lapdog media & govt's attitudes to terrorism, why when terrorism is raising its head

in Manipur the lapdog media refuses to dare anyone about that, of course it has no questions for the govt.; but it began using a defiant tone against Canada but when the US stood with Canada, it went quiet on the US. These are all videos from different Canadian cities, we are not showing the beauty of Canada intentionally, these are all common visuals there. The current controversy is affecting people in many ways. Canada is a beautiful option for those giving up Indian citizenship to settle el

sewhere. Canada, which the Indian govt has termed a terrorism hub, made many such people NRI, fulfilling their dream of leaving India. The rich Indians coming from here are given grand welcomes in every village. 'Oh, the kiddo lives in Canada?!' Fed up with India's shoddy colleges, many parents send their children to study in Canadian universities to save them from ruin. Obviously, for them, Canada is not a terror hub but a country for education. People from Punjab and other states, fed up with

the unemployment here, go to Canada in search of opportunities, obviously Canada is not a terror hub for them. This August, the government released data that in the last decade, 15 lakh people Indians have taken foreign citizenship. Away from these controversies, Canada's quotidian life is normal, and taking advantage of the excellent facilities here, Indians are driving their cars on these roads and are also inviting their relatives to settle in Canada. is not that the truth? Therefore, while

it may be the government view that Canada is a terror hub, but when Modi visited Canada in 2015 after becoming PM, he clamoured loudly that an Indian PM had visited Canada first time in 42 years! The PM, who has converted diplomacy into a Secretariat exam question-paper, gave the formula for 2AB on this visit which maths scholars have not been able to figure out till date. Modi's "extra 2AB" continues to be useful for comics. So, look at this controversy from a broader perspective. Recently, the

re have been serious reports on terrorism from 3 places, but the ferocity and activism visible on Canada, the same initiative is not visible regarding Manipur and Kashmir. Especially Manipur, which shows that we do not look at terrorism from one perspective. On the soil of Manipur, a member of a banned terrorist organization is caught by the police with a weapon and the entire public takes to the street to get him released? Lapdog media does not discuss terrorism in the context of Manipur nor de

clare its people as supporters of terrorism the way it does Muslims vis Kashmir, Sikhs vis Khalistan. What could be the reason for this, I do really want to know. Does the Hindi heartland view terrorism only when religion comes into the picture, so that it can declare entire communities terrorist-sympathisers for their religion, villainize them and declare themselves 'champions'? Does the fight against terrorism seek the validation of religion within terror acts? After all, why did the Hindi hea

rtland and Hindi-language media not raise questions when a senior army officer & J&K DSP were killed by terrorists in Kashmir? When this news came, PM Modi was welcoming himself with flowers at the BJP office. There was a case of terrorism here too, then why didn't the lapdog media ask the PM what is all this? Further, Indian Express has reported in detail how drugs have become the new terrorism in Kashmir, but the lapdog media does not question the PM on this either. nor does it produce an emot

ional whirlwind in Hindi states. Because the media discussion on Kashmir and terrorism has now run out of gas. Obviously, a new enemy and country are being sought so that lapdog anchors can spread the illusion that they are not doing journalism because at this time they are busy protecting the country and religion. They are very busy! Same is the condition of Manipur. Thousands of weapons have been looted there. Reportedly, banned terrorist organisations are getting active again. Meitei communit

y organization COCOMI accused the Indian Army of colluding with terrorists, even then lapdog media kept silent did not go all out to arouse its audience that how dare anyone question the Indian Army? Even the government did not roar. The ferocity that comes in the lapdog media & govt. at the name of Khalistan & Pakistan, where does it go at the time of Manipur? On Sept 16, 5 persons were arrested from Imphal East on charges of possessing weapons and wearing camouflage uniforms. They were detain

ed under sections of IPC, UAPA and Government Secrets Act. One had also been a cadre of a separatist organization. Manipur's Additional Home Secretary has said that some people are disturbing law & order wearing police uniform. Demonstrations are being held for their unconditional release. Due to this demand, a bandh was called for 2 days this week. During this period, violence was seen in these demonstrations in many areas including Imphal. Many women protesters surrounded the police stations.

Complete curfew has been reimposed in Imphal East and West. According to the Telegraph, demonstrations were held in front of 25 police stations. The Indian Express has written that the house of the officer in charge in Imphal West was also damaged. Police and security forces used tear gas as Meitei community reiterated their demand for removal of Assam Rifles. During the farmers' movement, lapdog media promptly termed the farmers as Khalistanis. The farmers ousted lapdog media from their midst a

nd the biggest artists of Punjab supported the farmers. Punjab knows the reality of Khalistan, it becomes easy for lapdog media to blame Canadian Sikhs for this, because it is a different country and the activities of Khalistan supporters also provide opportunities, but the Sikh community there is also not completely standing with them. Is it possible that once again, this time in the name of Canada, another religion is being fitted into the mould of terrorism to create another imagined enemy? L

apdog media is silent on the issue of Manipur, lapdog media is silent on the martyrdom of army officers in Kashmir, lapdog media is also silent on the indecent remarks on MP Danish Ali vis terrorism and religion in the Lok Sabha. Please watch our second video on this issue. lapdog The media's obsessive coverage on Canada is being lambasted globally. But you will see that the languages of lapdog media and government are similar. Therefore our question is – and you should also think about it – tha

t why is terrorism made an issue only when the opponent is Muslim or Sikh? This is their politics, when Canada speaks, they call it terror base and when USA stands with Canada, they go mum seeing USA. That's why I say, save your steps from the cow-dung of lapdog media. Goodbye, this is Ravish Kumar.