Main

OUTBURST: AI, foreign aid, financial stress, social media - January 28, 2024

This week, we're asking Canadians: - Do you believe AI could impact future Canadian elections? - Does Canada spend too much money on foreign aid? - Are you experiencing more financial stress than a year ago? - Does social media have a positive or negative effect on Canadian politics? Did you know you can watch this video in the language of your choice? Check the video setting in the bottom right corner of the video player. Select the settings (gear) icon, then select “Audio track” from the list, then select “French (Canada)” or "English (Canada)". Like this video? Subscribe to CPAC on YouTube: youtube.com/@cpac Connect with us on… X (formerly Twitter): https://twitter.com/CPAC_TV TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@cpac_tv

cpac

4 weeks ago

[Music playing] I'm Glen McInnis and this is Outburst. On the program, are you experiencing more financial stress than a year ago? I think everybody is. No, not really. Well, everything is higher-- home heating, groceries particularly. It was a struggle from the beginning. But first, artificial intelligence is seemingly becoming a household phrase with each passing day, week, month, and year, but many people feel AI could be the spark which ignites more misinformation and disinformation for mill
ions of voters around the world, including here in Canada. In 2024, roughly half the world will be going to the polls in their respective countries, so will AI help or hinder the democratic process around the world and here at home? I'm not too familiar about AI, but I do think that there probably will be some impact at some point, yes. And I think AI will affect a lot of things we do, including the elections, and what we see and what we do, what we get on our news feeds. -And what we hear. -Yea
h. Yeah. I do believe that AI is going to be an issue that both countries are going to be dealing with significantly. I just cannot justify that I want some artificial intelligence thinking for me, and trying to make up, and trying to put out things that are going to influence people to vote and everything else concerned when it's not actually coming from the heart of some human being. And so, I'm not a big proponent and fond of AI at all. Definitely. AI seems to be kind of infiltrating every ar
ea of politics and life. AI could not only affect our future elections. It could affect our whole country and the world. If there is-- because we have so much social media, we depend so much on electronics, that it's easy to manipulate and, yes, it's a concern. Oh, absolutely. The AI development is amazing. It's impressive, but I think it's going to be used in a highly manipulative way, and I think it will affect the upcoming elections, both in the US and in Canada. Well, the first thing is you
tied together two words that I don't think fit-- intelligence and elections. [Laughter] So artificial intelligence has been around for the last hundred years as a science, as a research issue, and it's been in place for corporations and business, and playing a major role in terms of shaping future society. But talking about the phenomena of just the sensationalism of artificial intelligence and whether it's going to distort an election, waste of time. I think we're now getting it into the public
domain, but in my line of work, we've been aware of artificial intelligence for quite some time, and it's now pervasive. I mean, it's part of when you search the internet why certain articles come your way and other ones don't. So it's already shaping people's opinions even if they're not aware of it. So, yes, it's going to have a significant impact on future elections. It definitely will have an impact. I mean, even if you look at how campaigns could be organized, using information from artifi
cial intelligence sources. They could basically know what a campaign to the public to get the public to vote for them, so that definitely would be an influence. Yeah, that's probably a very simplistic view, but it definitely will have an impact. 100% yeah. I think if campaigns aren't using artificial intelligence to sort of market trends, process data, they'll fall behind. I think it'll be, yeah, 100% it will. If you look around outside, artificial intelligence may actually be better at providin
g a stable and balanced government for us, if you look around at the general public. But I believe artificial intelligence is something that needs strong regulation and control. I mean, it's kind of scary to think about, but I do believe it will have an impact-- for better or worse, it's too early to say-- but it definitely will impact in the future. Yes, absolutely, 100%. [Glen] Tell me why. Well, because you have no control of what happens behind the algorithm, who's controlling it. It's a tot
al unknown once you let it loose. Well, yes, yes. I mean, look at what's going on with the internet. People are just so driven by what they see and they don't question it. So just look at what's happening down in the States with all the, you know, potential fake news and things that are going on. So, yeah, absolutely. If you don't question what you-- what you see and read, then absolutely. I think so. I mean, in the sense of just people using AI to vote but not in another sense. I don't think it
could impact it in a bad way but in a good way. It could make the process faster. [Glen] Okay. Okay, and you? I think that people can use AI to search, like, to learn more about the people that are-- [Glen] Running? Yeah, exactly. So it could be helpful, but I don't think it will be bad. So maybe it can be useful but not in the wrong way. I think it could impact the future of everything. [Glen] Yeah. Because it is-- it can actually do on a certain level some thinking, so if people get lazy and
let it do the thinking, and don't channel it, then, yes, it could. I think in terms of what's been going on in the US, it's already affected the way people think about things. The Bannon-- Steve Bannon, he was kind of a pioneer in creating something from nothing and making people believe it. So I think it's just one of the many things we have to worry about with AI. It's good stuff, but watch out for the bad stuff. Because it gets more and more difficult to understand what's the fake and what's
reality. And I see a lot of-- some people as using it to take advantage of the situation and doing whatever they can to-- how do you say-- take an advantage, manipulate is a good word, yes. So, yes, I can see it as affecting future elections. [Music playing] When it comes to helping less fortunate countries around the world, Canada has always been quick to lend a helping hand through peacekeeping, sending food and supplies, or providing financial aid. And while helping people in need is the righ
t thing to do, some people feel the federal government is overlooking people in need in this country and we should look after our own before shipping millions out the door. So we took this question to Canadians. I'd say yes and no for me. They spend a lot in foreign aid, but I don't think they put it in the right places, and I don't think they monitor where the money goes. It's not-- you know, sometimes I think it goes into places that the intention's good but I don't think it gets into the righ
t hands and people don't get the benefit of it. No, I think we have a responsibility to provide as much foreign aid as we can. Now, having said that, we do have to have some fiscal responsibility, you know, in government, but foreign aid is a very important part of being a member of NATO and a very important part of being in the United Nations. Well, I don't think so. I mean, basically, one way or the other, we're all-- we're all part of one world, and we definitely have to do what we can to mak
e things good for everyone. I know that until we succeed at making things as good as we can for Canadians, then we-- then we, you know, we can't afford-- the average Canadian can't afford, you know, to help as much directly. So I'm looking forward to a time when we all feel confident that helping others is a good thing because we feel we're able to do it. I believe they do. [Glen] Yeah? Should help more at home. Big time. [Glen] Big time? Why? Well, we should be focusing on our local communities
first probably, you know, instead of elsewhere. No, not enough, in fact. Regardless if we're Canadian or we're somewhere else in the world, it's our responsibility as humanity to look after each other, and to protect each other, and to care for each other. So if we have $10 and somebody has nothing, we should both have five. Absolutely. Canada definitely needs to help its own people before reaching internationally. Well, it depends on how you classify foreign aid, I think. I'm pro-Palestinian.
I do not support what our government is doing with Israel, but I do believe that foreign aid as a concept is important to support. There are lots of countries in the world where Canadians are seen as helpful and empathetic, and I do think that our tax dollars should be better spent on helping people that really do need it, including those in our own country. Well, I don't know how much we spend on foreign aid, so it's hard to know if we do. But if Canada doesn't spend a lot of money on foreign a
id, what countries should? What countries can? We want to be part of the G7 and the G20. That comes with a responsibility. So I think, yes, and I think some people figure it's one or the other. Is it one or the other? I'm not sure. Yeah, there are problems here. Look around Bank Street. We have a lot of homeless people living in the malls, riding the buses and the trains. But if we decide that it's one or the other, then it's a hard choice. But I'm not convinced it's one or the other. So I think
Canada has responsibilities abroad, and our cities and provinces have responsibilities here. It's a tough one. I think that our well-being is also dependant upon what's happening outside of our borders. So in that way, no. But, yeah, I think for our own homeless, for our own people, yeah, it's-- how can you say-- it's a tough decision. But I'd say, no, it doesn't. I think it does affect our well-being what happens outside our borders. Not sure. It ought to be a calculated balance. [Glen] What d
o you mean by calculated balance? What do you mean by that? Well, you may-- you'll have to determine how much, you know, in terms of your foreign policy you want to dedicate to actually supporting foreign causes abroad. I don't know what the values are. I do think that we have a moral-- [Glen] Obligation. --obligation to, yeah, to certainly do that. We are very well off overall, although there is a component of our population that is not. That's a tough question. I mean, there's never enough mon
ey to go around, right? That's the reality. We are a major nation in the world. We are a wealthy nation. We are part of the United Nations, the Commonwealth, and we have a role to share with our neighbours around the world. So I don't believe we're spending too much on that. We might look at belt tightening somewhere else but not on that. Right now, I think they spend what they can to help out, you know, other nations. And I see money going to places like Ukraine and the Palestinian-Israeli conf
lict, and I think it's important to provide support to those people, especially when we come from a country that's as wealthy as ours. No. In fact, I would rather see them spend more on our defences and foreign aid but get us back into the world where the world respects what we do. We don't spend enough money on foreign aid. We spend too much money supporting fossil fuel industry, and we spend too much money trying to create jobs in Canada which doesn't seem to work. [Music playing] Who was the
oldest Canadian prime minister to assume office? Alexander MacKenzie, Sir Charles Tupper, Sir Robert Borden? Sir Robert Borden. Tupper. Tupper. Tupper. Tupper. Borden. Tupper? No? MacKenzie? No? Tupper. Maybe it was MacKenzie. Assume office. I'll go with Tupper. Yeah, it's Tupper. Oh, I was lucky there. That was a guess, wild guess. [Glen] At age 74, Sir Charles Tupper holds the distinction of being the oldest person ever sworn in as prime minister of Canada. Tupper was a father of Confederation
, serving as Nova Scotia premier when the province joined Canada in 1867. He also served in several cabinet positions in the House of Commons and as the Canadian High Commissioner to Great Britain. Tupper is also the shortest serving Canadian prime minister at 68 days, after being defeated by Sir Wilfrid Laurier's liberals in the 1896 general election. [Music playing] Millions of Canadians are still experiencing a higher cost of living in 2024. Even though inflation rates have dropped recently,
they've also risen slightly, and Canadians from coast to coast continue to practise a precarious balancing act when it comes to managing their money. As we are well underway in a brand new year, we took to the streets to ask Canadians if their financial prosperity has grown or weakened in the last 12 months. Our question. Uh, this time more than last year? [reporter] Yeah. Uh. Actually, I feel like it was a struggle from the beginning because like, life is really hard, especially for internation
al students since we have like the school-- like the payments for the university is super high and we have a lot of charges, other charges. So, I believe it's getting worse year by year, especially with the inflation, because the university fees are higher this year, so it's definitely worse. Yeah. [reporter] And you? I think it's harder. For example, as she said, university fees. We came here with a scholarship but they added a percentage this year which made it very, very hard. And rent as wel
l. Rent percentages are so high right now it made it very hard for us. I think it's inflation but it's not-- it's not helpful at all. It's getting very, very complicated for students, especially international students. Well, everything is higher, home heating, groceries particularly. Getting around is more expensive. Everything is just more expensive. -Yeah. -Yes. Yes, but again, I'm very well off, so I'm not going to worry about it. But I'm a commercial real estate broker. I do office leasing.
Look around us, how many people are going to their offices nowadays? But I have nothing to complain about. I wouldn't say stress. I think we have a decent family income. We don't-- We can't afford everything we used to. Maybe we won't be taking a trip March break this year, maybe stay closer to home in the summer, but-- In the larger scheme of things. But, yeah, we have less money to spend than we used to, there's no question. The financial stress aspect of it, to a certain extent, yes. I'm alwa
ys uncertain about what the financial markets are going to do. Unfortunately, for us, our biggest issue is the escalation of our interest rates because of the rates that the federal government has established. And that's raised the substantial amount of people that are trying to be the first time home owners to buy and go out and be able to purchase a residence and so it's impacted the housing market in a number of different things. Not so concerned about the consumer market, credit cards, and s
tuff like that, granted that has some impact on people's budget. But the ability for first time home owners and people to go out and get themselves established, that makes it significantly harder when our interest rates are as high as they are right now. I-- No, not really. [Laughing] It like fluctuates based on what job you're having, I mean, groceries are obviously way more expensive but that's-- Yeah, normal increase inflation. Yes [Chuckling] There's, I mean, prices seem to have gone up for
everything. Everything. You know, even just trying to take a break away in a short holiday and everything you do is like 20% to 40% higher in everything. Everything. And wages haven't kept up. Yeah, yeah. I think I've made a lot of phone calls in grocery stores of, "Is this really the price that this should be?", with everything. And especially-- actually bread is one that surprises me. It's the prices of bread going up, that's one. I don't-- That sounds weird but I'm like, why is bread-- Bread
shouldn't be going up in cost. That's such a basic need. But yeah. I'm blessed to be in a position where I do feel the stress, but it's not like the 50% of Canadians that can't find $500 in an emergency. That is a national shame. The US is the same. People are going through food crisis these days and it shouldn't happen in our country. I mean, yes. I feel like every year I feel like financial stress gets worse and worse because every year our taxes go up. And I feel like-- I feel like being in t
he working class is really difficult because you don't get-- you don't qualify for as many, say, subsidized housing or subsidized-- Social programs. Yeah, social programs and grants. So, I feel like as a working class person, it is difficult every year, more difficult every year. Um. Yeah. Just because everything-- And also inflation. Everything's growing in price too, and, yeah. And as a senior, I agree. I think it's more expensive this year, I find, for just regular groceries and just regular
things you need. Um, well obviously interest rates have gone up which means that mortgage repayments are higher. Even if you have a credit line, the repayments on that will be higher. Food prices. I mean, some items within a week, you'll see a 25% jump in the price of one single food item. So, people's grocery bills could possibly have increased by up to 30% to 40%. And that presents challenges for people who want to eat healthily and look after their health and feed their children healthy foods
. Yeah, so I think everybody is feeling the pinch, and myself included. Oh, definitely more. You'll go for milk, bread, and eggs, and somehow it'll be 100 bucks. Yeah, so definitely pinching pennies. I don't know, that's hard to say. I'm trying to get a little more responsible with my money. So, I may have been more financially stressed last year but I'd say it was a bit my fault. But things are definitely more expensive now so you've got to be a little more careful. I think everybody is. I mean
, you know, people have-- Price of gas. And, uh-- Everything-- Especially when we were living in PEI. Everything we had-- we don't have the option of rail and stuff, so everything that comes in here comes by truck. So that's-- The truckers have to pass that on to the consumer. So, I mean, yeah it's-- Everything keeps going up. Yes, I would say so. I think I've experienced financial stress like a little bit, but this year it's definitely hitting me a bit harder. But, yeah. Yes, absolutely. Absolu
tely. As a Canadian, for sure, especially here in the Maritimes. I've actually relocated here from Nova Scotia, so I have a bit of experience with both of them. Both Nova Scotia and PEI over the last year have been hit very hard with financial struggles. [Music playing] The way people debate or discuss politics has changed dramatically in recent years. Tools like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, or X, just to name a few, has enabled people to discuss the issues more freely and more often. But some p
eople fear it also plays a part in distorting the facts. We took to the streets to ask people if these platforms do more harm than good, or, are they an essential part of the modern day political debates? Our question. I mean, I think in the next election we-- this is going to change how people vote for our prime minister especially, because we know what's actually going on because social media is powerful and is showing us what's really happening around the world. Social media has a large impac
t on just about everything. Social media has got such an influence on our younger generation that cannot determine things without seeing what, and going along with what everybody else feels that should be right irregardless if it's right or wrong. I would really prefer that social media just kind of go away and people start learning to think on their own. There are so many things on there that you don't know if it's real or if it's coming from an educated research background. And I fall for it a
ll the time too. She's really good at educating herself in the right places, and I see it all online and social media and I always come to her and like freak out over certain things. And she's like, That's not-- That's not correct. It was, you know, manipulated or it's not a reliable source, so I think it's bad. Thank you. Yeah, you're smart. I'm not. [Laughing] What happens in social media is that people tend to silo. They tend to go into echo chambers and they never hear other opinions, and th
at's kind of un-Canadian. You know, traditionally in our culture, we were willing to listen to the other person's perspective and try and reach some kind of consensus on things we can agree on, and move forward on those. And I think one of the impacts of social media is that people stop having the capacity to entertain alternative perspectives on world events, on public policy issues, on virtually everything. And they live in echo chambers and they just shout to a crowd. And when they encounter
people who don't agree, they don't know how to cope. I think that social media has a negative effect because we have a lot of these, I don't know if they're companies or people that are putting out false information. And a lot of times people feel because it's on social media they believe that it's the truth and they do no investigation of their own. And so they take what people are saying without checking the facts. And so I think there needs to be some standard or some guidelines when people p
ost things on the internet that the facts should be checked first, before they even post. And if they post something, that we find out that it's not true, a fine should be paid. Well, it has a negative effect on Canadian politics. And I think that when you see the amount of time that people are spending on social media, it's worrying. Well, I mean, it's not going to disappear anytime soon. I think that if people who are interested in politics and who have good ideas, if they make sure that they
stay involved in social media, then it'll probably have more of a positive impact. And if we ignore it, and if we don't move with the modern times, then whoever's trying to have a negative impact, they can definitely harness that power. Uh, definitely a negative. I think that social media kind of amplifies spreading hatred towards your neighbours, people with differing views. And then it spreads, and communities suffer. Yeah, so I think social media is definitely a negative. Ooh. I think it can
have both. I think that there's definitely lots of positives but there's certainly some negatives. And I think that, just like anything else, that that goes for politics. I think it has a positive impact. You get more information through social media than you would just listening to the politicians speak. So, I think it definitely has a positive impact. I think it has both a positive and negative impact. I think compared to the legacy media, you might be able to access various different types of
opinions. As opposed to when we rely on legacy media, oftentimes, we get trapped into our own echo bubbles and echo chambers. So it's, I think, a complicated answer. I think it has both. I would say that if you're looking for one type of politics it'll tend to serve you what you're already looking for. It's hard to deny that the rise of right wing politics and encouraged by platforms like Twitter, now X, are in a monetary bubble right now. You know, that kind of getting rage attention is where
people are seeing a financial gain and benefit. It has been positive, but when you have platforms like Twitter or Facebook, that are owned by these very individualized private corporations, it's hard to know if their algorithms are trustworthy or that they have the people's best interests in mind, I think. I don't think it brings out the best in people. I think it makes everybody a little bit more hostile. Negative, for sure, because as soon as you load any of it it's just down a rabbit hole of
negativity and adverse thoughts. Negative. [reporter] Why? Again it's-- If you have a soapbox, you can get on that soapbox and people will listen to you whether your viewpoints are good, bad, or whatever. It just-- It just-- What do I want to say? It's just it gives an avenue for anyone to say anything without any check-- checks and balances. Repercussions, yeah. I think the way it's trending right now, it's a negative. Yeah. I think there's too much false posts putting out there. And I don't th
ink enough people really grasp what's real and what's fake. And so, overall, I'd say right now it's trending negative. I think-- I won't say negative. People-- I think social media is very helpful. People can give their opinion. They can express themselves freely. And that's-- I think it's very positive. Social media is so good. Like you can-- You can talk about whatever you want and it's very helpful, and it's reachable. [reporter] What about you? I believe the opposite because I think that soc
ial media is like the worst thing for people nowadays. I'm not using social media at all. And I'm not trusting them at all because I believe that they're spreading fake news. So, I believe that people are using it to like manipulate us. And I think that's-- You should learn more by yourself by like travelling, or by like living through experiences. But I don't trust social media, like, to be honest. [Music playing] Thanks for watching this episode of Outburst on CPAC. If you have any comments ab
out this show or any other show, you can find us on social media. You can also find us on our website at www.cpac.ca. I'm Glen McInnis, and on behalf of my colleagues at the Cable Public Affairs Channel, thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. [Music playing]

Comments