Sony 20-70 f4 G https://geni.us/4VDVIE9 (affiliate link)
Tamron 17-50 f4 https://geni.us/k4HcY (affiliate link)
The Tamron 17-50 f4 and Sony 20-70 f4 are both made to be the perfect walk around lens but which one is the best?
On the one hand the the Tamron 17-50 has a great wide end going all the way to 17mm but the Sony 20-70 gives you more zoom range going to 70mm. Since both lenses are f4 they both perform similarly in low light but how do they compare in sharpness and contrast?
Both of these lenses are excellent in performance and optics but when it comes to price there is a pretty big difference as well.
Learn how to use and fly your drone to create professional results by taking my course here: https://www.solocreatoracademy.com/store
Find my favorite camera and drone tech here:
https://www.amazon.com/shop/jakesloan (affiliate link)
I use Artlist for all my music: https://geni.us/kqV9l (affiliate link)
Join my patreon to see behind the scenes content and more!
www.patreon.com/jakesloan
Connect on:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jakesloanpage/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jakesloan/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/jakesloaninak
Jake Sloan
PO BOX 212445
Anchorage, AK 99521
DISCLAIMER:
Jake Sloan is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.
This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission.
00:00 Intro
00:38 Field of View Difference in Photo
02:00 Field of View Difference in Video
03:54 Stabilization comparison
05:56 High Speed Photo shooting difference
07:33 Comparing Sharpness, Contrast and Flaring
08:53 Physical Differences
10:38 Price Difference
10:57 Outro
this is the Sony 20 to 70 f4g lens and this is
the Tamron 17-50 F4 lens what's the difference between these two and if you're looking for
a you know $1,000 less than $1,000 lens for kind of walk around vlogging all- inone
lenses which one of these should you buy on paper they're pretty similar obviously one
has a little wider one goes a little longer on the telephoto end but they're both
an F4 lens constant throughout the zoom range and they're both uh frankly a really
great walk around vl
ogging lens but one of them might be a lot better for you so let's
test these out and see what they're capable of okay this is at 20 50 70 all right now switch
the lens oops not that one I got so many freaking lens caps in my pockets right now nice got some ice crystals on the lens
that'll be helpful for later when I have to clean them up and post all right it's essentially
the same spot uh let's see 17 uh and 50 very nice okay so next I do some video clips and show
you the difference betwe
en 17 mm and 20 mm because that's you know and then of 50 and and
uh the compression you get between 50 and 70 mm too on the long ends of the lenses cuz it
is actually pretty Stark uh a pretty dramatic difference all right here we go so this is what
17 mm looks like I'll have to mark my spot here in a sec and here's 50 mm so you can see this is
all that at 56 so one think about the difference between 17 and 20 is you think it's only 3 mm
but it actually is pretty a pretty big difference whe
n you get on that wide end and of course you're
gaining 20 mm on the long end with the Sony which makes a very large difference when you're getting
a little bit more of that compressed background look the longer lens look all right where was I I
think I was right here right yeah well this is 20 mm 50 mm oh boy I hear 70 mm now just so you know that was all an eight
K with just the standard stabilization which means just the mechanical stabilization built
into the camera because you obviousl
y get the full field of view when you do it that way
on the Sony cameras if you switch to active stabilization you get a fair amount of crop so I
feel no it's an 8K with no uh you know no extra crop so you could see the full entire field
of view of each of those lenses but there is something that's not much discussed my buddy
Chris Brockers has mentioned it a couple of times but you do actually get better active
stabilization when you're using native Sony lenses so next let's try a handheld
walking
shot with the Sony lens and then we'll do as close to the same exact shot as we can with
the Tamara lens and see how those different uh looks work out with stabilization so this
is handheld 20 mm standard stabilization which is just the ivis now we're going to switch to
the active stabilization so this is 20 mm with active stabilization on the Sony 20 to70 here now
we're on the Camron in standard stabilization just handheld walking at 17 mm which uh does make a bit
of a difference
here's the Tamron at 20 standard stabilization now we'll switch to active so here
is the Tamron at 17 mm active stabilization on the A1 here is the Tamron at 20 mm on active
stabilization again makes quite a difference now in the stabilization this is where I do see
a pretty large difference the Sony because it communicates better with the camera or it's
programmed into the firmware of the camera or something Sony is able to calculate how to change
or adjust the active stabilization based
on the focal length of the lens where it just doesn't
perform quite the same as a third-party lens like the Tamron or Sigma or anything like that which
is interesting cuz you know you would think the focal links are same and it's it's communicating
the focal length with the the camera but there's something about the way Sony has calculated the
active stabilization with Sony lenses that it just knows a little bit more about the lens about the
you know image characteristics whatever it might
be that it can get that calculation that much
better and give you a much smoother much more stable shot than a non-native Sony lens so another
thing not talked much about non-native Sony glass I mean we talk about it but in practice how much
does it work out I'm using the A1 so it should be able to shoot up to 30 frames a second in
high-speed Burst Mode question is how does it actually work when I'm using the Tamron versus
when I'm using the Sony let's find out he here we go all right now w
e're on the Sony and that will be where you'll see the most
difference especially if you're shooting on something with high burst frame rates like the
A1 or the A9 Mark I or Mark III uh a non Sony lens may not be able to F Focus as quickly as
the camera can and you'll see a difference when you're shooting moving subjects I keep hoping for
a moving subject and so far uh there aren't any all right we're moving on it's too dang cold
to sit here and do anything so we're going to go see about uh
maybe a different location see
if we can find something that's a little more pleasant at least a little out of the wind and
on the plus side it will let us get warmed up by getting some uh some blood moving hey if you're
enjoying this video or getting value out of it then consider subscribing my focus is helping
solo creators like myself make good decisions when it comes to buying new gear and then also
get the most out of it by giving you tips and tutorials on how to use it and maximize i
t
it was an extremely cold day but it was a beautiful day to take photos but let's look at
some of the differences between the two photos um there actually weren't as much as I thought
so I've got the Tamron uh this is the Sony 20 mm here pull that up and look at some of the
sharpness this is the Tamron there we go and again this is on the A1 so 50 megapixel Stills
I mean if you're not going to see sharpness but I they're very very close like I see the Sony
has a little bit more contrast a
nd maybe a tiny bit more sharpness um look at the sun Stars
the sunf flares honestly here I kind of like the uh the tamon sun Stars a little bit better
personally but that's you know it's just that's I think that's pretty subjective um uh oh this
is going to be hard to match up let's go right there so I mean they're very close I I do think
the Sony has a slight Edge on sharpness over uh and a little bit better contrast but they're
they're extremely close for two F4 lenses they're doing extr
emely well so beyond that there are
some other differences you need to be aware of one is the fact that Tamron this is an internal
zooming lens so the outside of the lens doesn't change at all it is well weather sealed it's got
a nice little uh weather sealing on the back and then it has a focus hold button or programmable
button and the ability to us or uh upgrade and change the lens function via USBC other than that
it's pretty simple and pretty straightforward now the Sony on the other h
and has a click ring for
aperture clicking on or off it has the aperture ring which is pretty nice you can uh manually set
your aperture of what you want it to be and then of course it has autofocus manual focus switch
and focus hold buttons on the side and the top but if you're going to do a lot of gimbal work
this lens does have an extending Barrel so from 20 to 70 you can see it extends a fair ways and
that might make a big difference for you if you do a lot of gimbal work and that's one
of the
reasons I actually really like the Tamron 17-50 for gimbal work is it gives you just a nice
Zoom range but it doesn't change the weight on the gimbal enough to have to rebalance or
anything now now when it comes to weight the Tamron is 458 G so pretty light weight and the
Sony is 489 G and then of course there's the size differences the tamron's a little narrower
and a little longer the Tamron has a 67 mm filter thread where the Sony has a 72 mm filter thread
but again if you're go
ing to zoom the Sony out 70 mm that makes it quite a bit longer and doesn't
really necessarily change the or the length of the tamaron doesn't really necessarily change
it doesn't change cuz it's internal zooming and then of course we come down to what is arguably
probably the biggest determining factor for most people and that's price the Tamron comes in
at $699 whereas the Sony comes in at $1,99 so a $400 price difference so if you're very budget
conscious then the Tamron is definitely go
ing to be the lens for you the performance is excellent
but I'd love to know what you think which one of these lenses is better were you surprised by how
they performed compared to each other let me know in the comments below next you're going to want
to watch this video over here which covers some great budget lenses for Sony I'll see you over
there as always if you have questions ask me in the comments below or join my live stream
which happens most Wednesday nights at 400 P p.m. Alaska t
ime 8:00 p.m. Eastern where we can
have a little bit more of a conversation maybe get two questions I didn't answer in this video
I'll see you again soon in the next one cheers
Comments
Great review as always Jake, thanks! All Tamron guy here currently (LOVE the 50-400). What caught me by surprise in this review was how much more I liked the initial overall hues from the Sony lens… more blue by default than green… just cooler to my eyes. All easily changed in post of course. Interesting difference with the Active Stabilization. I had planned on getting the 17-50 to pair with my 50-400… 2 lens solution :D.
Been waiting on more people to cover this topic. I’ve been so torn on these two. Mainly want to use for travel vlogging
I have the Sony 20-70 and it has become one of my favorite lenses ever. (I mainly use it for photography) Together with the 70-200 GM II it covers like 90% I need, so it´s a really lightweight kit. Sometimes I bring the 14mm 1.8 GM as well, which is also really light, so cover the ultra wide shots.
The colors are definitely different. Great review. I still don't know which I'd get. I think you have longer arms similar to me. So the 20mm with activate worked for you while vlogging.
Thanks for the comprehensive comparison Jake and I am surprised to see the active stab performing so much different between lenses. Good to know! While I still have it I'm going to test the Tamron 20-40mm vs the new Sony 24-50mm and see if I can see a significant difference on my A7C2.
Hi Jake, thank you for the great review. I had a chance to shoot with the Tamron 17-50 and it flared more than what I see in your images. I shot mostly around f8-f11 and had great sharpness throughout the range and better results on the shorter focal lengths. I just noticed that you were shooting at f18-f20. I am wondering if the softness in the Tamron may be due to refraction kicking in. Just a thought.
I shoot much older Canon DSLR now about 12 & 13 years old. My everyday lens is a Tamron 18-270 f3.5 and a Canon 18-135 f3.5 w/ macro. The macro gets the call when a lot of video is shot as it's better & faster at autofocus with video or if I know I'm not going to shoot many 'up close' images from the vantage point when 8 might rely upon better autofocus that I can't plan when I'm guessing focus do to depth of field that snaps into focus (you know where wider apertures have a shallower depth of field than the narrower apertures long/dep depth of field) field
Man your drone is giving me anxiety hovering over the water like that in the background of some of the shots lol.
which one would be ideal for European in city travel, like Paris or Rome?
I'm not a vlogger so what do I know, but I'm surprised that either of these lenses would be in the running, given the weight of a zoom and the relatively slow f-4 max aperture. Wouldn't a fast fixed focal length be optimal? Thanks for the review - I always enjoy your insights. 🤘
Oh man, every time I feel tempted to get back into Sony because of a cool new lens or body… then I see the IBIS test and 😖. The LUMIX S5II is just soooo good in that field, is worth some other compromises
Basically I wish Sony made the 17-50 with the nice build quality and buttons, plus active stab.
4 hunny difference for a debatable 50 dollar difference. One may sacrifice paper notes for art. Do like that contrast.