In the history of monster movies, few franchises
have had as big of an impact, or as strange of a journey, as King Kong. Maybe the most famous movie monster ever made,
Kong sprung out of the imaginations of Merian C. Cooper, Ernest B. Schoedsack, and Willis
O’Brien and onto the silver screen in 1933 in a story of adventure, terror, and tragedy,
becoming a pillar of blockbuster Hollywood filmmaking. But what was once a story with
a definitive end soon gained unending life. Over nearly a century o
f film, King Kong has
been reborn and reinterpreted again and again, shifting from international reimaginings to
cinematic universe ambitions. To date, King Kong has been the star of 10 live action films,
with massive gaps, changes in rights, and vastly different films that, while reiterating
on the same ideas over and over, have massively different outlooks on both the meaning of
the story of Kong and the technology used to bring him to life. Here, we’ll explore the entirety of King
Kong’s live
action film history, spanning from his depression-era death to his kaiju
hero’s journey and the many strange detours in between. So join me as we journey through the never-ending
rise, fall, and rise of the king. — The story of King Kong begins with the larger
than life story of Merian C Cooper. Cooper, born in 1893, was an American adventurer
who seemed to commit his life to being a pioneer in every way imaginable. A bomber pilot in
World War 1, a volunteer and prisoner of war in the Polish-So
viet War, a world-travelling
researcher, Cooper was a documentarian making travelogs with his friend and fellow filmmaker
Ernest B Shoedsack before coming up with the idea for King Kong. Cooper’s idea for Kong came from blending
his many different passions and inspirations together for a story that typified a mythological
approach to nature and exploration, realistic in its travelog ideas but fantastical in its
actual subject. The book “Explorations and Adventures in
Equatorial Africa” had inspi
red Cooper at an early age to be an explorer, but also contained
the fantastical story of massive apes carrying off women from villages. A 1926 expedition
to the East Indies funded by the American Museum of Natural History brought back two
Komodo Dragons to the Bronx Zoo, only for the animals to die in captivity. The film’s
script would go through multiple evolutions, with Edgar Wallace writing a draft based on
Cooper’s ideas, which was then rewritten by James Creelman, and finally rewritten aga
in
by Ruth Rose, Schoedsack’s wife, who created diaglouge including the film’s famous last
words and turned Carl Denham and Jack Driscoll into essentially versions of Cooper and Schoedsact. However, no studio wanted anything to do with
Cooper’s ambitious and unclassifiable project except for David O. Selznick, Head of Production
at RKO Radio Pictures. "David played one vital part,” said
Cooper. “He was the only human being that backed me up 100 percent. He didn't know what
the hell I was doing
. Everyone thought it was nuts. And everybody wanted me to put a
man in a gorilla suit. And it would have been just horrible." At one point, Cooper imagined making Kong
by capturing a gorilla in the wild and having it fight a komodo dragon. For the sake of
good film and animal rights, that idea was thankfully scrapped when RKO’s stop motion
animator Willis O’Brien came on board. O’Brien and previously worked on making a dinosaur
film titled Creation, but this was scrapped after 20 minutes of foo
tage were made, with
multiple sequences making their way into King Kong. Kong’s story is relatively simple, but it’s
told with a massive scope that changes dramatically across its 3 acts, starting with the assembling
of our movie cast and boat crew and the journey Skull Island, is a wild chase through the
jungle, as the crew pursues Anne when she’s been taken by Kong. The pace here is absolutely
relentless and its often easy to forget that this film is nearly a century old as creature
after crea
ture are thrown at our rapidly dwindling band of heroes, showing Kong to not be the
only danger on this time capsule of the prehistoric age. And finally, the film reaches its most
iconic moments in the third act, as the captured Kong is put on display on Broadway and quickly
begins rampaging across New York. With Cooper and Schoedsack both directing
and O’Brien in charge of bringing it all to life, King Kong is a cavalcade of special
effects. Of course, Kong, an 18-inch puppet, is brought to lif
e through stop motion animation,
but so is every other fantastical creature and dinosaur, with Cooper acting out the scenes
to help O’Brien overcome the massive challenges of the production. These were blended together
with actors through matte paintings and rear projection, timing movements in sync with
pre-existing footage. And of course there’s the giant hand to help Wray actually have
some interaction with the ape. Every Kong scene is a marvel, but his fight
with the T-Rex in particular is i
ncredible, showcasing the amount of personality O’Brien
gave his creation, augmented by the unintended byproduct of Kong’s fur constantly moving
from O’Brien’s fingerprints. One of the most socially resonant elements
of Cooper’s story is its Great Depression setting. By the time of its release in 1933,
the United States was at the nadir of the Depression, with 24.9% of the nation's total
workforce unemployed and President Roosevelt’s New Deal policies yet to take effect. That
desperation in King
Kong is most acutely felt by Anne Darrow, who is plucked off the streets
of New York to star in director Carl Denham’s new film, traveling to the mysterious Skull
Island for an exotic locale. While it’s only a small aspect of the film, the contrast
of everyday desperation and the glitz and glamor that Denham and crew attempt to achieve
makes the sense of escapism that King Kong the movie provided to audiences part of the
movie itself. So when Kong begins rampaging through New York, he brings ev
erything and
everyone crashing back down to the reality they hoped to escape. As for Kong himself, the underlying themes
of the film have been debated for about as long as it’s existed. Given that the film
was made during the height of the Great Migration, where millions of African Americans moved
out of the south and into cities around the world, and that Kong is worshiped by and connected
to an African tribe, the film’s commentary on racial tensions have been considered by
many. And if Kong is
a metaphor for black people in America, is the film judging them
to be uncivilized or exploited by the US? Is Kong’s fate a commentary on what must
change in the 20th century or an acceptance of the way things are? Personally, I find that the original King
Kong is presenting these ideas without making a firm judgment while still lamenting Kong’s
death. After all, “it was beauty that killed the beast.” Every new film since has had
to deal with this underlying idea. Beyond its story, King Kong es
tablishes certain
recurring elements that are touched on by nearly every film that follows, and it's the
changes made that help differentiate these updates on well-worn themes. How sympathetic is Kong? Is he more rampaging
beast or misunderstood creature? What is his relationship to our male and female leads
and do they understand him? How fantastical is Kong’s home island? What are the natives’
relationship to the giant ape? What do our humans want with him? And what is the ultimate
fate of Kon
g? In Cooper’s film, Kong, while being an incredible
monster creation, is much more of a rampaging animal, full of rage, prone to eating people,
and wanting Ann for himself because of how beautiful and strange she is to him. As a
result, Ann and Jack don’t have a relationship with him, in fact, they spend most of the
time trying to get away from him. Skull Island is essentially the most dangerous place on
Earth, with the native tribe’s wall not just keeping Kong out, but all sorts of dinosaurs,
giant bugs (a deleted scene lost to time forever), and other creatures out while they still worship
Kong as their god. Of course, the big third act development is Kong’s capture and display
in New York when Denham chooses him to be his claim to fame. And like those komodo dragons
in the Bronx Zoo, Kong’s run-in with civilization leads to his death. King Kong was a massive hit when it was released
on March 2, 1933 , opening to a then record-breaking $90,000 opening weekend and making $5.3 million
against its $675,000 budget. Cooper’s gamble had paid off, and its risky pioneering effects
made the film into something audiences had never seen before. King Kong would inspire generations of filmmakers
for decades to come, helping creators to not only remake or homage Cooper’s movie, but
to become passionate about and pursue a career in filmmaking that was clearly illustrated
to them in the pioneering but obvious effects of King Kong. However, the first real product
of its legacy is not much
more than a strange footnote. — With RKO’s demand for a follow-up superseding
everything else at the studio and Cooper now their production chief, the film that would
be named Son of Kong was rushed into production. Written by Ruth Rose and directed by a returning
Schoedsack, Son of Kong premiered on December 22, 1933, a little more than 9 months after
the original hit theaters. And while there’s some interesting ideas and it’s overall
fun enough, the short production schedule and smaller budget
are obvious in every aspect.
It’s also barely an hour long, not really enough time for our characters or their quest
to have much interesting happening. Plain and simple, Son of Kong has cash-in
written all over it and is definitive proof that the half-assed profit-seeking sequel
is nothing new in movies. Here, the film picks up with Carl Denham,
now our true lead, broke and facing countless lawsuits and charges due to his responsibility
for King Kong’s rampage. In search of a way forward, Denh
am eventually hits two critical
discoveries - 1, that there is a secret treasure on Skull Island and 2, a new female lead,
this time his love interest for the picture. After a rather meandering first half, we return
to Skull Island, with our crew quickly encountering another giant ape - this time a younger, much
smaller white one, with Denham presuming that this is Kong’s son and feeling some guilt
over what he did to his father in New York. Son of Kong is largely forgotten to time,
and for good
reason. Absolutely nothing here stacks up to the original. Not its story.
Not its effects. Not its creatures. Not its romance. And its creators knew they couldn’t
match the original either, with Rose saying, "If you can't make it bigger, make it funnier."
And Son of Kong plays a lot lighter than the original, not that it really helps all that
much. O’Brien returns here for the film’s effects,
but with so little time spent on Skull Island, he’s mostly bringing Kong Jr to life, who
becomes the an
tithesis to his big bad dad. With a sudden massive earthquake/hurricane
combo sinking the entirety of Skull Island and Little Kong sacrificing himself to save
Denham, the Kong story is truly over with every recognizable element gone forever. Son of Kong was a box office disappointment,
not gaining that fast cash they hoped to achieve by riding the coattails of the original and
making $616,000 against its $269,000 budget. With Kong, his son, and Skull Island gone,
it would be nearly 30 years unti
l King Kong would return in an unlikely country. — And this is where we get to a vital but complicated
aspect of Kong’s film history - production rights. Ok strap in. When Merian C Cooper sold King Kong to RKO,
he struck a deal that let him retain the rights to Kong, however, the director was never able
to get another Kong movie made after Son, instead producing the Kong-adjacent Mighty
Joe Young in 1949, which helped launch the career of stop motion extraordinaire Ray Harryhausen.
By the early
1960s, Willis O’Brien was interested in bringing Kong back himself, approaching
RKO, now a largely defunct company, and their attorney Daniel O’Shea for the rights to
make King Kong vs Frankenstein. O’Brien’s search for an interested studio eventually
led him to Toho in Japan, who had found success in monsters years earlier with Godzilla. Toho was interested in making a Kong movie,
they just weren’t interested in working with O’Brien, so the studio and attorney
O’Shea went behind O’Brien’s back
and made a deal directly with RKO, paving the
way for King Kong vs Godzilla. Cooper, however, got wind of the project and sued on the basis
of RKO giving him the rights. However, the documents proving the deal had been lost to
time and Toho was free to move forward with their film. Premiering in 1962, the film, directed by
Ishiro Honda and written by Shinichi Sekizawa, is the third ever Godzilla film and seven
years after the disappointment that is Godzilla Raids Again. It’s also a distinct new
direction
for the King of the Monsters, creating a much lighter and more family friendly tone that
would go on to define the rest of the Showa Era in a film that sees the head of a pharmaceutical
company and television producer search for a new sensation to boost ratings. The answer?
A giant monkey living on Faro Island, with Shoichi Hirose as the first ever suitmation
King Kong. Meanwhile, Godzilla is freed from his iceberg by a nuclear sub and heads straight
for Tokyo. The only way to save Jap
an is to drop Kong, who is frequently drugged by special
island juice, direckedly into Godzilla path. King Kong looks like they pulled him outta
the dumpster behind Toho’s office. Both the original Japanese and American releases
are deeply silly movies on purpose. The major difference between these two is, like most
of the US versions, the American release by Universal Pictures is slightly shorter, excising
scenes that aren’t immediately connected to Godzilla or Kong, and adding in scenes
where
a scientist explains what’s happening or what the military is planning to do next.
It is, like most US dubs of the time, an example of total lack of faith in both the movie and
the viewer. That being said, there’s not that much of
a difference in the general experience of either version of King Kong vs Godzilla, as
ultimately, this is about the two monsters colliding while also satirizing television
and news coverage of the time. Toho’s interpretation of Kong has very little
to do with the origi
nal beyond an island and a big monkey on a rampage, but it does continue
the idea of men foolishly thinking they can control and profit from Kong. Here, it’s
Mr Tako, a goofy dumbass who must eventually accept that he can’t control Kong, which
is made even more difficult because this Kong gets suped up by electricity, evening the
odds after getting his butt beat repeatedly by Goji. With a box office of 352 million yen, Kong
Kong vs Godzilla was the second largest movie ever in Japan at the time,
and another Toho
film was a guarantee. — Toho’s search for a Kong sequel hit more
snags than you might expect. A straightforward King Kong vs Godzilla 2 was written but scrapped
to instead bring in Mothra. Behind the scenes conflict turned the meant to be the Kong-starring
Ebirah Horror of the Deep into a Godzilla movie. Meanwhile, animation producers Rankin and
Bass had begun making The King Kong Show as a joint US-Japan creation. Toho soon agreed
to a partial live action remake of the show an
d created Ishiro Honda’s King Kong Escapes,
or King Kong’s Counterattack in Japanese, directed by Ishirō Honda and written by Takeshi
Kimura. So the movie isn’t really a sequel to vs
Godzilla. And it doesn’t really have anything to do with the cartoon. But it does have MechaniKong.
So I guess that’s something. Now Kong is a resident of Mondo Island who’s
kidnapped by an evil scientist when his own mecha ape malfunctions while digging for the
radioactive Element X. So yeah I guess we’re gonna giv
e Kong radiation poisoning or something.
There’s a woman Kong likes and he sorta has a dinosaur fight with Gorosaurus, but
this entire movie is nonsense. This would be the end of Kong’s time at
Toho, as their license expired before they could put him in Destroy All Monsters. Kong’s
time in tokusatsu is strange and mostly at odds with his classic interpretations, but
it would plant the seeds for his revival a half-century later. — By the early 70s, both Universal and Paramount
Pictures began purs
uing their own simultaneous remakes of King Kong, with RKO, already one
to play fast and loose with rights to their ape, indulging both in their pursuits. And this leads us to the most outlandish character
in this entire saga - Dino DeLaurentiis. Italian producer Dino De Laurentiis would
have his name on more than 500 movies over the course of his nearly-70 year career, moving
from Italian films in the 50s and into major US productions by the 70s. De Laurentiis was
always in search of the next h
uge success, shrugging off losses and largely devaluing
any actor or director in favor of the big picture, and the result was that De Laurentiis’s
career constantly veered between critical and commercial hits and embarrassing disasters
that often doubled down on franchises without an eye on quality. De Laurentiis, in conjunction with Paramount,
had paid RKO for the rights to Kong and began putting together his remake, However, Universal
claimed they had already been given a verbal agreement by R
KO to make their own version.
Paramount and Universal began to butt heads, with Universal announcing their own production
of The Legend of King Kong in the hopes it would cause Paramount to stop their own film.
But they didn’t count on Dino, who decided to rush his remake into production to ensure
his written contract with RKO would be enforced. Soon, a 1976 court case over ownership rights
resulted in the estate of Merian C Cooper, who had passed in 73, finally, legally getting
the rights back
to the “name, story, and character” of his creation and owed RKO’s
profits from their past licensing, while RKO still owned the original film. It gets a little
more complicated. The Cooper estate quickly sold the rights
to Kong to Universal, who have owned them ever since, but De Laurentiis’ film was
allowed by the courts to be released without Universal’s approval. As such, Universal
put their own remake on hold, which we’ll get back to decades later. In addition, the
original novelization of K
ing Kong, published in 1932 to hype up the movie, had fallen into
public domain, meaning that aspects of the story could be remade by anyone now while
Universal still held partial legal ownership. Anyway. The King Kong remake from 1976! Directed by John Guillermin and written by
Lorenzo Semple Jr, with many elements including its modern day setting and World Trade Center
climax dictated by De Laurentiis, the film sees the Petrox Oil Company discover a new
island in their search for oil, only to
have their expedition disrupted by Jeff Bridges
as stowaway Jack Prescott, here a primate paleontologist, and Jessica Lange as Dwan,
an actress whose boat exploded. No I’m not from New Jersey, her name is Dwan. (d w a
n scene) Cue island, monkey, rescue, New York rampage. Kong 73 repeats specific beats from O’Brien’s
classic, like the log attack and the New York chaos. Most importantly, it keeps the central
story of star crossed lovers intact. Oh and Jack’s here, too. IM JOKING. But seriously
th
is monkey and lady both want each other. Dino would proclaim his film to be, "the greatest
love story ever made," and say, “No one cry when Jaws die. But when the monkey die,
people gonna cry. Intellectuals gonna love Kong. Even film buffs who love the first Kong
gonna love ours. Why? Because I no give them crap.” That’s a quote to TIME MAGAZINE. And to that end, the remake is much more romantic
and sympathetic to Kong, while also being less operatic in tone, with our mysterious
island having no
other outlandish wildlife outside of one big snake. Like the original, DeLaurentiis’s Kong also
came in the midst of a national crisis, as the production happened shortly after the
1973 oil crisis, where OPEC’s total oil embargo of the US and other countries caused
prices to soar and gas availability to plummet. The scarcity of oil and its control over US
politics is a major element of the entire film’s motivation. There’s a very obvious ecological focus
to this Kong story, as Jack is not just
a paleontologist with much more sympathy toward
the ape than the original, but our main human antagonist is an oil company executive, played
by the late great Charles Grodin, who has come to the island in search of new land to
drill. Kong is just a happy accident for him that he exploits when there’s no oil to
be found. Even Kong’s New York showcase is a reminder of the oil exploitation, as
the monkey is trotted out in a giant gas pump for his grand reveal. Worldwide education about and research
into
the animal kingdom and primatology spearheaded by researchers like Jane Goodall had come
a long way since the days of the original Kong. Fierce and mysterious jungle creatures
were no longer valued simply for being a prized trophy, but were the subjects of conservation
and restoration. King Kong 73 is a crude representation of that, but still it’s an attitude that
turns the ape from a raging mythic monster into a complex animal. To bring Kong to life, special effects artists
Carlo Rambaldi
and Rick Baker collaborated on what was meant to be an ambitious new creation.
However, De Laurentiis rushing the film into production also kneecapped his artists. Rambaldi’s
40 foot tall, 6.5 ton, $1.7 million animatronic Kong, at first planned to be the main way
the ape was brought to life, basically didn’t work. The animatronic makes up less than a
minute of screen time, with the rest being Baker in costume. Baker was so unhappy with
the end product that he gave all credit to Rambaldi, who h
elped salvage the film by puppeteering
the mask’s facial animatronics. There’s clearly shortcomings to the 76 film’s
effects. The green screening is terrible, but I still think the costume works thanks
to good lighting and the overall performance. The scope and scale of the entire film helps
offset those issues, even if the obvious man in a costume of it all is, like the Toho films,
a major source of cheese in what is otherwise trying to be a prestige picture. 76’s ending is even more tragic tha
n the
original, as Kong is more sympathetic, purposefully putting Dwan down to protect her from helicopter
fire atop the then-newly opened Twin Towers. His death is bloody and brutal, and instead
of the romantic sign off of the original, Jack and Dwan stay divided by a mob of photographers
who surround her and ignore the bloody beast behind, hinting that these two will always
be separated by their experience. With a $23 million budget, King Kong would
go on to make $90 million worldwide, solid b
ut below the $150 million that DeLaurentiis
wanted. Still, the producer wasn’t ready to let go of the property he’d fought to
capture. — Like most Kong movies, the 76 remake ends
with the king dead. Despite that, a direct sequel would be made by DeLaurentiis Entertainment
Group, which the producer founded in 1984, and Dino, never one to pass up milking his
movies for every cent or making bold claims to get attention from the press, had almost
immediately said there would be a sequel, saying “Ste
ve McQueen made a picture in
which he died at the end, but they made another picture with Steve McQueen. Many stars die
at the end of a picture and then go on to the next picture. Kong is a star. We are going
to have a new story, a new Kong." Look, I don’t know what this dude is talking
about but the point was despite Kong being deader than half my friends’ YouTube channels,
he was coming back. Over the course of the next decade, DeLaurentiis searched for the
right idea on how to bring his monke
y back to life, with writer Steve Pressfield revealing,
"They had King Kong in Russia and King Kong in outer space. Really, this is not an exaggeration.
They even had one with little kids leading him around, saying things like 'Careful, Kong,
don't step on that car.' It really was an embarrassment." Well Steve, you’re one to talk because you
wrote King Kong Lives, directed by a returning John Guillermin and written by Ronald Shussett
and Steve Pressfield. The belated sequel hinges on the double
reveal
that Kong is alive but has been in a coma for ten years and that there is indeed a female
Kong out there. Soon, giant monkey doctor Amy Franklin, Linder Hamilton, and adventurer
Hank Mitchell, Brian Kerwin, must bring these two together to save Kong’s life. But a
post-op Kong escapes, leading to a battle with a crazed general and his troops to protect
Lady Kong and their soon to be born offspring. That all sounds ridiculous in that bad but
entertaining schlock kinda of way, but the truth
is that this movie is REAL boring. Once
the monkey heart surgery starts, complete with giant chainsaws, big old clamps, and
construction equipment used to replace a giant heart, you know this whole thing is cooked. Production was a nightmare too, with Guillermin
grief-stricken and erratic from the recent death of his son, disappearing for days and
replaced mid-shoot by documentary filmmaker Charles McCracken. Years after the film, Hamilton
revealed, “I was stunned when I saw it. It was the most
ridiculous movie. While we
were filming I never saw one full-size Kong, only a hand or a foot, as I was acting against
huge blue screens most of the time. It was a hoot when I finally saw those monkeys flirt
and bat their eyes. Then it horrified me for being so stupid." Kong does, eventually, bite it, but not before
he smashes the military and briefly meets his offspring. I don't think you’ll be surprised to learn
that King Kong Lives was a flop, opening in 12th place in its opening weekend and
making
only $4.7 million. The flop, alongside several other concurrent failures, pushed the DeLaurentiis
Entertainment Group into bankruptcy. The production company was officially dead by 1989 while
DeLaurentiis himself would produce films into the 2000s. And despite Universal now free from competition
over Kong, this embarrassing failure would keep studios away for years. — In the time since purchasing Kong, Universal
had leveraged the property with the King Kong Encounter attraction in Univers
al Studios
Hollywood and Kongfrontation ride in Universal Studios Florida. And by the 1990s, the studio
was finally ready to proceed with their own remake, signing on director Peter Jackson,
who had impressed the studio with his work on The Frighteners. Jackson is a self-proclaimed life-long King
Kong fan, making his own Super 8 stop motion recreations of the film as a kid and crediting
the movie as the reason he pursued a career in film. Jackson and wife Fran Walsh wrote
the remake’s screenplay
in 1996 and began working with special effects studio Weta Workshop.
This remake would bring Kong and the many dangerous inhabitants of Skull Island to life
with CGI, stop motion, and animatronics. However, when Universal realized that their
Kong remake would be competing with both TriStar’s Godzilla and the remake of Mighty Joe Young,
they pulled the plug on Kong in February 1997. I’m sure you know what comes next. Now released
from his commitment, Jackson moved on to make the Lord of the Ring
s for New Line and its
success brought Universal back to the director and his work with Weta. King Kong was back
on and by the time it was released in 2005, its story, Jackson’s creative control, and
the world of visual effects had majorly evolved. The end result is a 3 hour and 7 minute long
remake, taking place in 1933 and costing $207 million, following Cooper’s original beat
by beat, but ballooning the details, action, characters, and themes to massive proportions.
Really, there’s no point i
n detailing the plot, as it’s the same as what came before,
with Naomi Watts as Ann Darrow, a vaudeville actress swept off on the Skull Island expedition,
Jack Black as director Carl Denham, Adrien Brody as love interest Jack Driscoll, now
a screenwriter, and Andy Serkis as Kong, providing the motion capture techniques that he used
for Gollum in Lord of the Rings. Jackson’s movie works to really add a lot
of motivation and backstory to each character, which it accomplishes with some of the most
obvious dialogue you ever done heard. Meanwhile, it’s so indebted to the original that they
even mention Faye and Cooper working on their own movie. Everything is really well done here. This
is top of the line CGI, sets, costumes, high quality actors, big score, massive scope,
it’s all there and still looks remarkable nearly 20 years later. You can really tell
that Jackson and Universal were going all out here, no reservations, but the massive
size and its really over the top sometimes bloated n
ature works well in some instances,
and really not in others. The approach to the whole movie is taking
every idea from the original and doing it way bigger and going on for way longer. It’s
funny how this movie from 2005 is more melodramatic than the original. Cheesier too. You liked King Kong fighting a dinosaur? Well
what if he fought 3??? Want more of Ann and Kong? How about an impromptu Central Park
ice skating sequence??? In the wake of Jackson’s massive Rings movies
that only got bigger w
ith each entry, most every Kong set piece has like 4 more extenuating
circumstances than you’d expect. It’s a hat on top of a hat on top of another hat
that has the picture of a hat on it. After 70 years of Kong in pop culture, Jackson’s
take on the king is much more romantic and sympathetic. Having him be essentially a gigantic
silverback gorilla makes him more pure animal than most other interpretations, transposing
modern understanding of animal behavior onto a less caring 30s period piece se
tting. Jackson
and Walsh also devote much more of the film to developing Kong and Anne’s relationship,
helping them understand each other and become a more symbiotic pair, with Anne eventually
getting him to sign with her and recognize beauty while he tries to impress her. Kong
even negs Anne after the dino fight. When did Skull Island get a copy of the game??? The romanticism of Kong, Anne, and Jack’s
side is contrasted with Jackson leaning into horror on the other, playing up the dangers
of Sk
ull Island, with giant dinosaurs and the most horrifying bug sequence ever made,
bringing to life a lost deleted scene from the original where-Oh yuck let’s just skip
this. This is also probably a good place to talk
about the depiction of island natives in Kong’s movies. The Skull Island natives of Cooper’s
original film are, unsurprisingly, extremely stereotypical depictions of Africans despite
Skull Island being in Indonesia. They see Kong as God, paint themselves to look like
apes, and sacrif
ice women to him out of their ignorance and faith. King Kong vs Godzilla’s
islanders are similar, but don’t sacrifice women, that’s an improvement. The 76 islanders
are essentially the same as the original, including their ape dress and worship, which
is still a terrible way to characterize black natives. And the islanders of Jackson’s
film are some of the most insane shit ever. They’re crazed, murderous, mud-dwelling,
black-face-wearing possible cannibals. They’re worse than animals, they’re ba
sically Lord
of the Rings Orcs??? and that’s a really messed up depiction. Merian C Cooper ain’t
got nothing on this level of fucked up native representation. Look, I already know that this is the internet
and there’s gonna be a bunch of people who go “boo woke bullshit” but talking about
how people of color are represented in stories that are largely about white adventurers entering
an untouched land and enslaving their god is clearly touching on centuries of colonization,
slavery, and racism,
whether the filmmakers intended to or not. That’s just the reality
of entertainment reflecting history and worldviews, especially as fantasy and pseudo-real travelogs
intersect. Kong’s death is very emotional, really lingering
on his love for Anne and the inevitability of being killed, with Jack Black signing the
movie off when Faye Wray passed away before she could film a cameo. Jackson’s Kong would make $556.9 million,
the fifth highest grossing film of 2005 and in its wake, Universal used the
film as the
basis for 2 more theme park rides and a video game, securing its own unique, copyrighted
take on King Kong amidst its spiraling rights madness long before new life would once again
come to Skull Island. — After Jackson’s remake, Universal Pictures
intended to make a prequel titled “Skull Island,” with Adam Wingard to direct. At
the time, the film would have been co-distributed by Universal and Legendary, but have nothing
to do with Godzilla, who they had acquired the rights to in 20
10. In fact, Legendary
was far enough along in their Skull Island plans that they showed a teaser trailer at
San Diego Comic Con in 2014, with very few details attached to the project at the time. However, following the success of Godzilla
in 2014, Legendary became intent on making a new Godzilla vs King Kong movie happen within
the scope of a cinematic universe inspired by the success of Marvel Studios. To make
it happen, Legendary broke their distribution deal with Universal, moved Skull Islan
d to
Warner Bros, dropped Jackson and Wingard from the project, and wrote a new version of what
would become “Kong: Skull Island” with Max Borenstein, who also wrote Godzilla 2014,
in the hopes of making the kaiju battle climax happen. Universal, happy to focus on their
own Dark Universe, was willing to let the monkey go. Woops! Ok wait what. Hold on, more rights stuff.
See, remember how I told you that RKO retained the rights to the original film? Well, Warner
Bros finally bought the original K
ong and much of RKO’s library in 1996, so both Universal
and Warner can make Kong movies. Sorry, my brain is melting. Soon, Jordan Vogt-Roberts was brought onboard
to direct, who pitched moving the film from 1917 to the end of the Vietnam War to help
differentiate it from past Kong movies. With the new direction came several new drafts
by multiple writers and the debut of the film in 2017. Written by Dan Gilroy, Max Borenstein, and
Derek Connolly, Kong: Skull Island takes place in 1973 and place
s Kong squarely within the
Monsterverse established by Godzilla 2014, as titan-researching organization Monarch
commandeers a US Army unit to explore Skull Island as the Vietnam War is coming to a close.
Of course, what they don’t realize is that the island is watched over by Kong, who is
worshiped by the natives and protects his home from the giant lizards known as Skullcrawlers.
Kong’s conflict with the military causes Lieutenant Colonel Packard, played by Samuel
L Jackson, to seek revenge whi
le tracker James Conrad, Tom Hiddleston, and photographer Mason
Weaver, Brie Larson, try to stop this mini-war. So I guess Kong is the Viet Cong. Or the innocent
Vietnamese? Or maybe US soldiers drafted into a war they didn’t want to fight? Skull Island throws about every Vietnam War
cliche into the mix with its monster iconography and the result is fun if pretty obvious. You
know, napalm, Credence, helicopters, all the stock soldier characters. And then they get
smashed by an ape. Given that Sk
ull Island was made with the
express purpose to set up a Godzilla crossover, there are several major changes made here
to the King and his story. Visually, this Kong looks a lot more like the original but
way taller, now reaching 104 feet as a still-growing adolescent whereas the original Kong varied
between 18 and 24 feet. He’s also a lot more expressly heroic, acting as a protector
for the island and contrasted against the disturbing skullcrawlers and the increasingly
insane Colonel Packard. W
e also learn that his parents were killed by the skullcrawlers,
giving him shades of a superhero origin. Meanwhile, Skull Island is about as dangerous as the
original, but equally beautiful while Conrad and Weaver become sympathetic to Kong’s
fight, forming a sort of mutual understanding in the face of danger. It’s also the only solo Kong movie that
doesn’t see him captured and taken off his island, with Kong actually defeating the representatives
of civilization and asserting nature’s dominance
. Given that Monsterverse Kong is more in line
with kaiju archetypes instead of his typical tragic creature feature interpretations, it’s
not surprising, as these monsters have always represented ideas, dangers, and disasters
that are bigger than humanity and never truly able to be controlled. Kong’s strength and
heroism would be further explored in sequels, but here he’s still very dangerous, prone
to opening wide and eating a dude whole like Shaggy and a sandwich or simply crushing someone
und
erfoot. With a budget of $185 million and a box office
of $568.6 million, the biggest of the entire Monsterverse so far, its success helped offset
the financial disappointment of “Godzilla: King of the Monsters” to pave the way for
the crossover film Legendary had been planning. — “Godzilla vs Kong,” directed by Adam Wingard
(returning after his scuttled plans for the original Skull Island) and written by Eric
Pearson and Max Borenstein, acts as the climax to the Monsterverse up to this point, p
itting
the two titans against one another in a battle for supremacy, with several characters returning
and Monarch playing a central role like always (with even crazier technology at their disposal).
As touchstones for their personalities, Wingard cited John McClane from Die Hard as Kong’s
tough but overwhelmed protagonist and WWE wrestler The Undertaker as Godzilla’s antihero
inspiration - the dark, menacing figure who only appears when his rule is called into
question. Much like Son of Kong, V
s reveals that Skull
Island has been destroyed by the massive storm that once hid it from the world, with only
Monarch’s intervention keeping Kong and Jia, the last Skull Island native, safe from
the raging weather. And this is Kong’s transition into full fledged hero, complete with some
really excellent facial and body expressions that make him the most human he’s ever been.
Essentially, the now 335-foot Kong’s entire arc is being thrown into a conflict that he
has nothing to do with, as Godzil
la and Apex war around the world, and being way in over
his head. He also gets the film’s big hero moments, making choices of self-sacrifice
and doing the right thing, like saving Godzilla’s butt from being stomped by Mechagodzilla and
essentially being the only creature in existence that can cause Godzilla to change his mind.
Having him being able to sign with Jia and Rebecca Hall’s Dr. Andrews gives him a far
greater amount of direct communication than any other movie. Elements like the Hollow
Earth being home
to Kong’s species and his ancient throne and the dorsal plate battle axe are the most
outlandish ideas of any Kong movie, but they’re in line with the Monsterverse’s growing
arc of cartoonishness. Alongside those elements, Godzilla vs Kong
is also much wilder in its setpieces and hypercolored in aesthetics. Each Monsterverse movie moves
further and further away from Edwards’ more grounded and somber 2014 film until Kong and
Godzilla are battering each other in a neon Hong Kong
night with a glowing axe and high
flying attacks. By the end of the movie, the two monsters
have come to a truce, with Kong finding a new home in the Hollow Earth in a rare happy
ending for the ape and Godzilla off to rule his domain. These movies highlight that Kong
is the true protagonist of the Monsterverse with the biggest character arc. He goes from
an orphan who loses his family and his home to a reluctant world savior to a friend of
multiple human characters and the ruler of a new land. M
eanwhile, Godzilla largely stands
as an inscrutable force of nature, enforcing his rule and restoring natural balance to
the world, with humanity caught in the crossfire. Despite debuting during the height of the
Covid pandemic and being simultaneously released in theaters and on HBO Max, Godzilla vs Kong
had a solid performance of $470 million against its $200 million budget. And while this was
the end of the first initial plan and licensing deal that Legendary had with Toho, its success
led to
the deal’s extension. While that wasn’t necessary for further Kong stories,
such as the Skull Island Netflix cartoon or the ape’s cliffhanger appearance at the
end of Monarch, it was needed for his next encounter with Godzilla. — The newest addition to the Monsterverse and
released just a little bit before this video’s release, Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire is
directed by a returning Adam Wingard and written by Terry Rossio, Simon Barrett, and Jeremy
Slater. And while we won’t get into every
detail
and are limited by what footage is available, we will get into spoilers. Hey maybe a dedicated
GxK video in a few months, anyway. Jump to this time to avoid spoilers! Picking up a little while after GvK, Godzilla
X Kong sees our two monsters as masters of their separated kingdoms, with Godzilla keeping
his fellow titans under control on the surface and Kong searching for his species within
the Hollow Earth. Kong’s search accidentally releases the evil Scar King, his ape army,
and the gian
t ice koopa Shimo, who previously caused the Ice Age and nearly took over the
planet millenia ago. The planet’s only hope is for former enemies to become partners,
and the journey is filled with giant lore dumps, ancient civilizations, zero gravity
tag team fights, and the return of our unproblematic queen. To say this is the craziest, most unapologetically
over the top Monsterverse film is an understatement. To go along with this increasingly heightened,
Showa-inspired tone, GxK has several hom
ages to the past, with little stinker Suko in the
vein of Son of Kong when he’s not used as an impromptu nunchuk, and Kong’s giant mechanical
gauntlet gives him electric powers just like his King Kong vs Godzilla powerup. The fact
that Monarch simply has this stuff lying around and its dropped in without any setup may feel
like a total disregard for storytelling, and yeah it kinda is, but it’s of a piece with
the exponential ridiculousness of the Monsterverse. Much like Dutch in the Aliens vs Pr
edator
arcade game, everything is cooler with a robot arm. “What I wanted to do with this film more
than anything was to put you in the perspective of the monsters,” said Wingard. “I wanted
to do a film that was driven by nonverbal visual sequences.” And one of the film’s strongsuits is that
both Kong and Godzilla are given large portions of time without human characters, relying
on fantastic character work to tell you everything you need to know, with Kong especially given
the chance to emote a
nd grow on his own. Godzilla largely plays support in the film,
as it’s once again Kong that has the true character arc, in search of family and then
fighting to his home against a monster that is essentially a dark version of him. Godzilla
has some cool fights and overall is still presented with great gravitas, but I think
his Berry Blast powerup doesn’t feel all that much different and isn’t as impressive
as his Burning Godzilla overload in KOTM. And to go back to the representation of Skull
I
sland natives, GxK adds a lot to the Iwi Tribe. First seen in Skull Island, they were
silent pacific islanders that had an ancient culture largely told to us by John C Reilly’s
Hank Marlow. Then, GvK wiped them out before the film began from the island-destroying
storm, leaving Gia as our only representative, who thankfully was given a lot of character
work. Here, it’s revealed that the Iwi are originally from the Hollow Earth, and are
not only all mute, but telepathic guardians of Mothra. That’
s a lot of retconned backstory,
but makes them more than the really garish stereotypes of old. If I have any real issues with the film, it’s
that the pacing is somewhat off, leading to a less satisfying conclusion and that once
we’re past Scar King’s introduction, he doesn’t feel like that much of a threat
to our heroes. Still with Wingard expressing hopes for a third part to create a trilogy,
I’m looking forward to what comes next. If GvK had humanity and mechagodzilla as the
true threat, and G
xK had our villains come from deep underground, then part 3, G slash
K obviously, should have our villains come from space. Gigan, anyone? Spoilers over. Godzilla x Kong cost $135 million and at the
time of recording had a $194 million global opening weekend box office, essentially guaranteeing
more. With Kong and a story set on Skull Island
also being teased at the end of Monarch Season 1, it seems like Legendary and The Monsterverse
as a whole is far from done with the story of the king. Meanw
hile, those complicated rights issues
shows their face once again, as Disney recently announced a Disney+ series based on Joe DeVito’s
King Kong of Skull Island novels with the endorsement of Merian C. Cooper’s estate.
From tragic stories to kids cartoons to countless parodies to being the star of more adaptations
than ever, there’s a quiet flexibility to King Kong that’s become more apparent than
ever, subverting what was once an inevitable dark fate for the king. — And as I do with every retro
spective, here’s
every King Kong movie ranked from worst to best. At 10, King Kong Lives. Misguided in basically every way. King Kong
Lives isn’t the first or last unnecessary Kong sequel, but it does just about everything
wrong, from its really silly ape interactions to its giant mechanical heart plot to the
really dull romance at the center. But worst of all, the film commits the cardinal sin
of film, it’s SO boring. Hairy dude shoulda stayed dead. At 9, Son of Kong Cheap cash-in sequels are n
othing new and
Son of Kong is proof. If you look at this from the perspective of the creators wanting
to make something more comedic, it works better, but everything in this movie is unsatisfying.
This is vastly inferior to the original classic in every way, proving this sequel, which premiered
only 9 months after the first, was made for nothing but making more money. At 8, King Kong Escapes This Toho kinda-sequel feels like someone
watched King Kong and then had a really weird dream. I’m not en
tirely sure what I think
of this movie, because it has all that old Showa charm with lots of James Bond espionage
thrown in, but it also feels like the movie lacks any real ideas. Yes, it has Mechani-Kong.
That’s about it. At 7, King Kong vs Godzilla A deeply deeply silly movie in both the Japanese
and English versions. However, I appreciate its satirical side, and the kaiju fights,
while sloppy due to them being some of the first ever, are fun. Like every Kong movie,
there’s a running commentar
y of men trying to control and profit from Kong and ultimately
failing, and this is much more focused on in the Japanese version. Also, King Kong not
being able to beat Godzilla under normal circumstances is established here and is CORRECT. At 6, King Kong 2005 An extremely ambitious and massive movie that
is wayyyyy too long and wayyyyy too melodramatic to always work. It’s beautiful and a top
of the line production in every aspect, but Jackson’s commitment to just doing the original
Kong but b
igger and with a more romantic sweep gets really tiring with a whole hour still
to go. Andy Serkis is doing great work as Kong and him getting his head swallowed by
a worm has haunted me for decades. At 5, Godzilla x Kong This film is just a massive, insane, super
lore heavy blast of cartoonish fun. The smaller cast helps keep it focused and Kong is once
again done justice in the Monsterverse, with Godzilla the supporting role but still being
an insane force. It’s not quite as satisfying as Godz
illa vs Kong but this basically gives
you everything you’d want in this wild premise. Plus the synthwave vibes are immaculate. And as far as the film’s ranking in my overall
Godzilla rankings I set in my Shin Godzilla video, I’d place Godzilla X Kong at 15,
above Godzilla vs Gigan but below Godzilla vs Kong, and yes that updated list includes
Minus One but we’re not taling about that yet. At 4, Kong Skull Island Consistently entertaining throughout, with
some absolutely beautiful shots and compo
sitions that feel rare in the age of CGI overreliance.
It’s also satisfying in the larger scope of Kong movies to have our monkey beat civilization
and stay on his island. Still, its use of every stock Vietnam archetype, cliche, and
song feels stale a lot of the time, with these elements slammed together with the Kong story
to feel a little more fun than usual. At 3, Godzilla vs Kong. Despite how bad the Godzilla side of the human
characters is, everyone on the Kong side is so good. GvK is super
goofy and exaggerated
and really working hard to set up reasons for the fight, but the characterization of
Kong is GREAT. I love how in over his head he is and that his expressions really show
that he knows it. It’s hard to make a kaiju the true protagonist of any movie but they
pull it off here while keeping Godzilla as the Undertaker-inspired force of nature. And
these fights really pop off hard. It delivers! At 2, King Kong 1976. I may like this one more than the general
consensus, but I thi
nk this WHIPS. It’s the ecological Kong, putting the tragedy of
Kong in contrast to an oil tycoon and our heroes being truly in step with the plight
of our beast. It’s a big budget extravaganza that puts much more focus on the characters
than you might expect. It’s not as inventive or exciting as the original, but it’s really
strong and I like Kong’s sympathetic animal take in this. And at number 1, the original King Kong. An insane spectacle of effects and adventure.
But what’s most surprising
is how fast it all moves for a movie that’s nearly a century
old. It’s absolutely cutthroat in its action and violence, too, with both Kong and our
heroes creating paths of devastation in both the wild and civilization. Kong himself is
an unforgettable creation that’s launched the imaginations of countless creators in
a film that’s been often imitated but never topped. For a character whose biggest claim to fame
is his death, King Kong is more alive than ever, now a massive hero at the head of o
ne
of the few successful cinematic universes. But Kong’s history has taught us that the
film industry will only continue to change and demand new interpretations. Whatever comes
next, Kong will be waiting to become King once again.
Comments
Happy Ape-ril! What's your favorite version of King Kong?
As much as I am Team Godzilla, Kong still has major respect from, since without the original 1933 film, Godzilla might not have existed. I'm really glad the MV is giving him a story where he gets to be happy.
LET’S GO!! I love Godzilla, but I’ll always have a soft spot for Kong. The 2005 version was the first movie I saw in theaters. He’ll always be king in America!! Edit: For some reason people are talking about the quality of Jackson’s movie down here when all I said was I watched it in theaters, lol
Dude I was wondering when you’ll be covering King Kong, and you didn’t disappoint. As someone who loves Peter Jackson’s King Kong, fingers crossed that they re-release in theaters for its 25th anniversary next year.
Holy fuck that quick clip of Kong TAS just unlocked an entire chuck of my childhood I completely forgot about.
King Kong vs Godzilla is the greatest movie ever made! Does citizen Kane have a giant ape stuffing a tree down a fire breathing lizard? Does The Godfather have a giant ape fighting a giant octopus? I rest my case!
My favorite versions of Kong: The 1933 film. 2005, by Peter Jackson, and the Legendary Kong.
FINALLY! A King Kong Retrospective! Let's freaking go!
The original Kong is the most iconic. Jackson's Kong is the most simpathetic. Monsterverse Kong is the most fun.
“…the most terrifying bug scene ever filmed.” Someone hasn’t seen Barry Levinson’s The Bay.
What a timeless story. Skull Island really has stuck out to me out of all the films, however i did have a Peter Jackson Kong themed birthday party when i was a kid so, thats gotta be my winner
I am glad they needed a T-Rex analogue and created Gorosaurus in King Kong Escapes, because the moment in Destroy All Monsters where he and Godzilla both look at each other like, "Hey, you're a giant lizard too!" is so great.
Willis O'Brien NEVER approached Toho! It was producer John Beck who went directly to Toho, after every other studio rejected O'Brien's idea for "King Kong vs. Frankenstein". Toho agreed to do the film, with the condition that they remove the Frankenstein monster in favor of Godzilla. Beck agreed to the terms. It was he, not Toho, who blindsided Willis O'Brien.
The first giant monster movie I ever saw as a child was the original King Kong vs Godzilla. That's what introduced me to both giant monsters. And from there I've seen every Godzilla (Except Minus one) and ever Kong film. You can't beat the original 1933 classic.
It's always fascinating to me to hear a more negative take on Jackson's Kong when it's one of my own favorite movies ever. It's (almost) all those exact reasons it's not for you that I love it so much. The melodrama and extended length really bring a scope and grandeur to the story I almost never see with that kind of production value. I'd describe it as a Golden Holywood Era vibe, something like Cleopatra or Ben-Hur. It's just tailor-made for my taste. It definitely isn't something I want for every movie, but indulging in something so rich and overwhelming is the exact kind of treat I crave every so often. All that said, the depiction of the natives is genuinely next level "oh god holy shit I forgot how bad this is." I get the goal was to depict them as frightened, post-societal collapse scavengers, but Jackson's horror impulses and that infuriating slowmo thing he does (it's jarring in Return of the King too) really ruins anything that could have been sympathetic about them. If the story remained the same but they were just filmed in a more humanizing way, it might've fixed the entire issue. Who wouldn't react hostily if a sweaty Jack Black showed up and jabbered nonsense at your kid while shoving something in their face?
This just MADE MY DAY! Ive been watching your AMAZING Godzilla videos and now this pops up! You and Layton Eversaul are truly the best at what you do and as a fellow Youtuber, I am a big fan!
Kong Skull Island is my favorite Kong movie. It did justice to the character.
Jackson's flim was my first introduction into King Kong, so I have to put his flim on number 1 since I grew up with it and loved it every since I saw it
I absolutely love Godzilla but I wouldn't have been introduced to him if it wasn't for Kong. I grew up watching both the 76 and Peter Jackson King Kong and have always viewed him as not only one of the best movie monsters bur one of the most sympathetic characters in film. I'm really happy the Monsterverse is expanding more on Kong as a character than ever before
Love your retrospective! The first 1933 King Kong is what I fell in love with. Peter Jackson's 2005 film is a labor of love and I can appreciate that in his version. Back in 1976, me and my buddies answered a background casting call in the LA San Fernando Valley for Jeff Bridges' Kong. We were in the grandstands for hours watching a h u g e King Kong move his arms. It takes a lot of human effort to make this mythical wonder come alive. Thank you to the various craftsmen over the years who give life to the adorable and monstrous King Kong we still see today.