Politicians put a lot of work into the way they get votes, and it’s not just by writing a great speech.
Can Game Theory Help A Presidential Candidate Win? ►►►► http://bit.ly/1SbzyAx
Sign Up For The TestTube Newsletter Here ►►►► http://bit.ly/1myXbFG
Read More:
Deep Voice Gives Politicians Electoral Boost
https://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/deep-voice-gives-politicians-electoral-boost/?print=true
“What makes a successful politician? Experience? Skill? Charisma? Perhaps you were searching for these traits while watching the recent Republican presidential debate. But what you might not have thought about was how your perception of the candidates could be influenced by their voices.”
Tears and fears: How do emotions change our political attitudes?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140303083927.htm
“Politicians know that turning on the tears can be a vote winner, but how does the political manipulation of our emotions actually work? Researchers explore how emotions such as anxiety, even if their cause has nothing to do with politics, can result in a hardening of our views.”
Candidate Voice Pitch Influences Election Outcomes
http://www.as.miami.edu/personal/cklofstad/25_polpsych_pitch.pdf
“To wit, while voters consciously consider their own political preferences and those of the candidates when casting their ballots, the results presented here demonstrate that the electorate also makes thin impressionistic judgments based on far more subtle factors of which they may not be aware.”
Physiological Arousal and Political Beliefs
http://jonathanrenshon.com/Site/Pubs-Articles_files/PhysiologicalArousal.pdf
"In support of our hypotheses, the results of the present study indicate that heightened physiological
reactivity, measured by SCL, mediated the relationship between anxiety and anti-immigration
attitudes. This provides critical evidence that emotions incidental to the decision process can have
important effects on our political beliefs."
____________________
DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily.
Watch More DNews on TestTube http://testtube.com/dnews
Subscribe now! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=dnewschannel
DNews on Twitter http://twitter.com/dnews
Trace Dominguez on Twitter https://twitter.com/tracedominguez
Julia Wilde on Twitter https://ftwitter.com/julia_sci
DNews on Facebook https://facebook.com/DiscoveryNews
DNews on Google+ http://gplus.to/dnews
Discovery News http://discoverynews.com
Download the TestTube App: http://testu.be/1ndmmMq
Sign Up For The TestTube Mailing List: http://dne.ws/1McUJdm
Politicians do seem to give off a slimy feel. Everything about them is polished and tailored
to try to get my vote. It’s kind of gross. And yet, I still vote for them. From the way they look, the way they sound,
to the words they choose. Politicians and their staffs carefully craft
their speeches and appearance to invoke emotion in their constituents. Emotion plays a huge role in who we will vote
for. A study published in the journal Psychological
Review found that often, our moral judgements ar
en’t the result of reasoning but of quick,
automatic, intuitive feelings. And politicians can use this to their advantage. They often get your vote by evoking some strong
emotion in you. Emotion tends to call people to action more
than reasoning, and unfortunately, the emotions political candidates often invoke are anxiety
or fear. A study published in the journal Political
Psychology, found that anxiety tends to influence our political views, especially towards certain
groups. For example, anxi
ety may make some people
remember negative experiences with immigrants making them more likely to vote for a candidate
who advocates tighter immigration policies. Plus, anxiety causes people to see ambiguous
information in a more negative and threatening light. And by invoking fear, politicians can rally
people around specific causes and create stronger allegiances with those we consider like us. Even more than what politicians say, is how
they say it. They might change the way they talk. A stud
y published in PLOS One found a deeper
voice correlates with the idea that the politician is stronger, more competent, and older. But deeper voices only benefit politicians
in specific instances. For example, a study published in the journal
Political Psychology looked at the 2012 U.S House elections, and found if a politician's
voice was deeper and their opponent was a female, they were less likely to win; especially
if they were male. The researchers think that a lower voice might
seem too agg
ressive, in that case. But it’s not just the language politicians
use, and the pitch of their voice, it’s their body language too. Politicians need to project an image of calmness
and surety. They use “positive body language” like
keeping gestures below shoulder level and steadying their hands. According to Don Khoury, a nonverbal communication
consultant: if politicians sway or fidget too much, this gives off vibes of arrogance,
insincerity, or low confidence, which turns off voters. Some resea
rchers even believe they can predict
election results on body language alone. And looks do go a long way. A study published in the journal Science found
that voters often judge the character of a political candidate based entirely on their
visual appearance, which can have huge impacts on elections. So politicians try to appear as attractive
as possible, especially if they’re a woman, because studies show that not only do people
prefer better looking politicians, they actually get more media cov
erage. And a study published in the journal Social
Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience found that a negatively received image, like if
they appeared threatening, was far more detrimental to their campaign than being attractive was
helpful. So much of what we feel about politicians
and politics is so... subconscious. Your feelings are decided before you even
know it. But maybe once we start to become more aware
of political tactics, we can use our cool reasoning instead of our fiery emotions to
Comments
"So politicians try to appear as attractive as possible" [3 pictures of politicians who don't look attractive at all] Got a good laugh out of that.
the point on appearance: Is that why Bernie Sanders looks so damn sexy?
That 80's fitness show background music was an interesting choice.
Trump is so popular because he looks gorgeous.
That is one of the flaws of democracy, it makes politics in some sort of "show", rather what is more beneficial. "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others" (c) Churchill
People are sheep
Politicians say what people want to believe is true.
Trumps speeches are at a 3rd grade reading level
It's important to remember, even the puppetmaster is a puppet themselves.
Bernie Sanders runs a campaign based mostly on hope and perhaps a small hint of revenge towards the 1%.
shows you how every candidate except bernie feels slimey
01:51 Pretty sure thats a dude with a wig on the left.
How to not get tricked by these tricks, Just don't give a shit.
wow, I love the objective view. I hope you make more videos about politics in the future.
The take away is that we should only read transcripts of speeches, or just go by their actions in previous positions.
You can also predict which candidate will win by who blinks the least during a debate.
And with this I believe that I can begin to make a case that emotion is a net detriment to human life.
I feel like this video is missing multiple obvious mind games that people fall sucker too. I was happy that fear mongering was listed but honestly I think it's dwarfed by the big one; if you want to persuade large groups of people, give them simple solutions to complex problems. People hate to be told that situations are complex. They hate problems that have multiple variables that are interconnected and inversely dependent. People absolutely desire the 'silver bullet solution', the overlooked but simply stated solution that will cure all ills, or take care of a particularly sticky problem in a elegant way. Ever want to catch a politician lying, just point to a 'simple solution' that is going to cure a generation years old problem. Nationalism: the cohesive support of laws, institutions, or politicians based on sovereign or cultural solidarity. Many people can suss out the difference between patriotism and nationalism if you give them a few minutes, but get a politician on the stage and some how patriotism becomes nationalism. Since patriotism is fundamentally based on ideals and ethics. As patriot you might be ethically cornered into a situation where you decry and criticize the agenda's of your government, military or laws... but as a nationalist, never. Flattery and antagonism, people are suckers when you tell them how great they are, how wonderful their goals are, how wonderful their children are, and how bad it would be for the former if the 'BIG BAD WOLF' got his way. As such, making someone or some country into a villain is useably linked with fear mongering and flattery but they tend to go hand in hand so you have to be cognizant of both. Immigration is great example of two of these things being combined... who are the villains? Immigrants! Why? Because they are simple solution to multiple complex problems. They come and benefit from social programs that they didn't pay into, they are obviously a vector for drug smuggling and human trafficking. They come and build dangerous communities for gangs and terrorist cells. And they take jobs away from "American Citizens" or "Geman Citizens" or "French Citizens". What?! you thought immigration was just an american issue? Sorry same political tactics are globally implemented. So obviously the simple solution to the is to close your borders. When actually the problem is quite complex because drug and human trafficking isn't dependent on immigrants, people who take advantage of social programs aren't always immigrants or even mostly immigrants. Can you have citizen gangs and terror groups?... hmm yes you can. And of course if you got rid of immigrants it'd solve the wage gap, right?! Hmm could be a globalization thing, plus a couple of other problems rolled in there but I digress. Another one is the tactic of displacement, usually one where a government or political party or person is the savior. FYI people get tired and sick of having responsibilities. Many responsibilities are tiresome involve a great deal of investment. On a side note this could also be titled 'How to become a leader'. All you need to do is take responsibility away from people who don't want it. Bam, your the leader. Vote Obama, for change. Vote Trump, Make America Great Again! It's also a great way to usurp choice away from the general public. Do you want the responsibility of checking whether a product is safe? Let the FDA do it for you, and then when your a Californian who wants to drink unpasteurized milk, you won't have a choice because some else has the responsibility. Do want super cheap medical care? Well you don't have a choice because there are no quack doctors available. Want a cheap massage? I'm sorry all, masseuses are now licensed. Do you want to take a greater interest in foreign policy, domestic policy? Guess what? It's not really your responsibility, so why don't you just sit back down and have a beer. Or you can even link these tactics together and point out that it's the villains fault when things go wrong. Obviously it's all China's, and Iran's fault, because they're responsible. Think I'll stop now.
Does this video apply to school campaigns?
So now i'm curious, how effective is it being aware of your own subconscious tendencies in terms of making the right decisions?