Main

The Most Hated WW2 Aircraft

On May 10, 1940, the Germans launched a relentless assault. Just two days later, a desperate gambit unfolded in the skies over Maastricht. No.12 Squadron dispatched six Fairey Battle aircraft, woefully ill-equipped for the ferocious dance of daylight warfare. They were sent to shatter the German advance towards Brussels by bombing bridges over the Albert Canal. Lacking speed and defensive might, these airborne heroes etched their legacy with daring assaults on the bridges of Maastricht and Sedan. Divided into two desperate trios, the Battles descended upon their targets, confronting a maelstrom of anti-aircraft fury. Amidst the thunderous cacophony, their metal wings clashed against an unseen foe. --- Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between. As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible. All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

Dark Skies

4 weeks ago

On May 10, 1940, the Germans launched a relentless  assault. Just two days later, a desperate gambit unfolded in the skies over Maastricht. No.12  Squadron dispatched six Fairey Battle aircraft, woefully ill-equipped for the ferocious dance  of daylight warfare. They were sent to shatter the German advance towards Brussels by  bombing bridges over the Albert Canal. Lacking speed and defensive might,  these airborne heroes etched their legacy with daring assaults on the  bridges of Maastricht and
Sedan. Divided into two desperate trios, the  Battles descended upon their targets, confronting a maelstrom of anti-aircraft  fury. Amidst the thunderous cacophony, their metal wings clashed against an unseen foe. In the crucible of technological ambition, the  British Air Ministry issued a challenge in April 1933, casting its gaze toward the future of aerial  warfare. The venerable Hawker Hart light bomber, a stalwart of the Royal Air Force, was slated  for replacement. The mandate was clear:
conceive a single-engine aircraft capable  of transporting a 1,000-pound bomb load, manned by a crew of two, across a 1,000-mile  range at a brisk 200 miles per hour. Undeterred by the technical hurdles posed  by this audacious specification, Fairey, a pioneering aviation company, stepped into the  fray. C.R. Fairey, the company's visionary leader, harbored reservations about the feasibility  of the Air Ministry's demands. Yet, Fairey presented a range of alternatives, blending  pragmatism with
ambition. Among the submissions, one design stood out—a manifestation that adhered  closely to the Ministry's exacting criteria. Against the odds, the Air Ministry embraced  Fairey's design. A contract was inked on June 11, 1934, charging Fairey with the construction  of a prototype. Guided by the skilled hand of Marcel Lobelle, the Fairey design  team birthed an aircraft with a singular cockpit, housing a crew of three—pilot,  observer/navigator, and wireless operator/gunner. As the prototype t
ook shape, the Air  Ministry, brimming with anticipation, issued a production order for 155 aircraft  in June 1935. The Battle, though destined for obsolescence from its inception, found  an unexpected ally in the geopolitical climate of the mid-1930s. The ominous rise of the  Luftwaffe fueled a desire for numerical parity, leading the RAF to order 155 Battles in  1935—well before the prototype's maiden flight. With the specter of war looming,  expediency triumphed over preference, and the Battl
e, equipped mostly with the  Merlin III engine, became a vital force. The Fairey Battle finally  took to the skies on March 10, 1936, under the command of Flight  Lieutenant Christopher Staniland. Its capabilities would eclipse its predecessors, the Hawker Hart and Hind bombers, as it could  carry twice the payload over twice the distance. The Fairey Battle emerged as  a curious chapter—a blend of modernity and obsolescence. Conceived with  a low wing and stressed-skin construction, its silhouet
te bore an uncanny resemblance  to an oversized fighter aircraft. Armed with a payload capacity that included four  250-pound bombs in its bay and two beneath its wings, the Battle embodied the spirit of  offensive capability. Its crew of three, nestled in the elongated "glasshouse" cockpit,  put their lives in the hands of this machine. Yet, as the Battle soared into the skies,  it found itself tethered to a bygone era. The specifications of P.27/32, which once defined  its prowess, had become
relics of a past age. The prototype, while meeting the initial requirements,  existed in the shadows of aircraft like the Vickers Wellington, born of 1933 specifications  and boasting superior performance metrics. By 1939, the Battle's age was apparent, yet it lingered on the front lines due to  the absence of more modern alternatives. Taking flight on April 14, 1937, the Battle's  genesis saw the maiden production aircraft take wing, powered by the groundbreaking  1,030-hp Rolls-Royce Merlin I.
This marked the engine's debut in RAF service, a  propitious start for the renowned powerplant. No. 63 Squadron was the first RAF squadron  to embrace the Fairey Battle just a month later. As war clouds gathered on the  horizon, the Battle found itself in the arsenal of eight training squadrons in No.  6 Group and ten frontline bomber squadrons in No. 1 Group—integral components  of the Advanced Air Striking Force. The Battle Mk I boasted impressive  specifications—a top speed of 257 miles per
hour, a range of 1,000  miles, and a service ceiling reaching 25,000 feet. Armed with a single forward-firing  0.303-inch machine gun, a rear Vickers 'K' gun, and a payload of 1,000-pound bombs, the  Battle was a force to be reckoned with. Yet, flaws were woven in the tapestry  of innovation. The rear gunner's position suffered from a downdraft  caused by its protective screen, this compromised rear visibility—a  vulnerability that would soon be exposed. As the Battle proliferated, a new chapter
unfolded  at a state-of-the-art factory in Stockport, later expanding to Birmingham's  Austin Motors. By January 1939, the Royal Air Force could boast a fleet with  over 400 Fairey Battles at their disposal. The stage was set for a potential aerial  onslaught against the Ruhr as ten Fairey Battle Squadrons, under the aegis of No. 1  Group, relocated to France on September 2, 1939. This strategic move was part  of a prearranged plan contingent upon German aggression in the West. However, the  Ge
rmans, embroiled in the conflict in Poland, refrained from provoking the Western powers,  plunging the front into the "phony war." In the crucible of conflict, the Battle  undertook reconnaissance missions over the German front line. A watershed  moment occurred on September 20, 1939, as a Fairey Battle from No. 88  Squadron downed a Messerschmitt Bf 109, securing the Battle's legacy with the first  RAF kill of the war. Yet, even in triumph, shadows loomed— the vulnerability of the  bombers in t
he face of German fighters became painfully evident, signaling the trials  that lay ahead for the stalwart Fairey Battle. With the ominous specter of war looming, the  German invasion of Poland in September 1939 thrust the Fairey Battle into the crucible of conflict.  Ten squadrons of these aircraft were dispatched to France as part of the Advanced Air Striking Force,  setting the stage for a series of pivotal moments. No. 88 Squadron claimed the first Royal Air Force  aerial victory of the war
on September 20, 1939, downing a menacing Messerschmitt Bf 109. The  echoes of success resonated on September 27, 1939, when No. 103 Squadron achieved another  triumph against the fearsome Bf 109. However, the tides of fortune would soon take a grim turn. The fateful raid on September 30, 1939, marked  a harrowing episode for No. 150 Squadron, as four out of five Fairey Battles were lost  over enemy positions in the Saar. Tragically, the remaining aircraft succumbed  to crashes upon landing, pai
nting a stark picture of the  challenges faced by these aviators. The year 1940 ushered in a new chapter  of desperation as the German invasion of France and the Low Countries unfurled.  The Fairey Battle found itself thrust into ground attack sorties, a role  for which it was ill-suited, lacking crucial features like self-sealing  fuel tanks and an armored cockpit. The toll was staggering, with 77 out of 118  aircraft lost between May 10 and 15, 1940. Amidst this maelstrom, on May 12, 1940, Fly
ing  Officer Donald Garland and Sergeant Thomas Gray etched their names in history as the first RAF  recipients of the Victoria Cross in World War 2. Their valor during an attack on the Veldwezelt  bridge in the Netherlands, though posthumously honored, reflected the indomitable spirit  of those who faced insurmountable odds. The vulnerability of the Fairey Battle became  painfully apparent during the early days of the German Blitzkrieg. Tasked with low-level  attacks against the advancing Germa
n forces, the strategy aimed to evade enemy fighters  but exposed the aircraft to a barrage of anti-aircraft and small arms fire. The  cost in lives and machines was devastating. On May 10, 1940, the first day of the German  assault, 32 Battles embarked on a mission to attack advancing enemy troops, and 13 were  lost. The following day, seven out of eight dispatched Battles met a similar fate. The  toll rose on May 12 when a force of five Battles targeted crucial bridges over the  Albert Canal—n
one returned. The commander, Flight Officer D.E. Garland, and observer Sergeant  T. Gray received posthumous Victoria Crosses. By the 14th, low-level attacks were abandoned  due to unsustainable losses. New tactics briefly showed promise, but on May 14, 63  Battles faced interception by Bf 109s during a mission against canal bridges, resulting  in the loss of 35 aircraft. High casualties persisted as the RAF retreated in the wake of  the German advance. The surviving squadrons were ultimately wi
thdrawn to Britain on June 15,  1940, having lost the majority of their aircraft and proving the Battle's inadequacy against  low-level operations and fighter opposition. As losses mounted, the remaining Fairey  Battle squadrons conducted their final sortie on June 15, 1940, marking  the denouement of their frontline service. Between May 10 and June 20, 1940,  a staggering 137 Fairey Battles were lost, signifying the inevitable decline  of this once-prominent aircraft. Upon their return to Brita
in, No. 1 Group  reformed, still equipped with the Battle. However, daylight raids were abandoned,  and the majority of Battle squadrons transitioned to nighttime attacks on German  invasion barges in French and Dutch ports. In the crucible of the Battle of Britain, which  raged from July 10, 1940, to October 31, 1940, the Fairey Battle found itself thrust into  the forefront of the conflict. Six Fairey Battle squadrons, including the newly formed  Polish squadrons Nos. 300 and 301 constituted t
he reformed No. 1 Group, Bomber Command. These  squadrons played a pivotal role during the battle, showcasing the aircraft's operational  debut on July 21, 1940, when six aircraft, drawn from Nos. 103 and 150 Squadron struck at  oil storage tanks in Rotterdam, Netherlands. As the battle unfolded, the Fairey  Battle engaged in a total of 289 sorties, with the final mission transpiring on October  15, 1940, as Boulogne and Calais in France felt the brunt of the assault. Astonishingly,  only six ai
rcraft succumbed to the ravages of war during this period. Following this chapter,  the Battle squadrons underwent a transformation, being re-equipped with the Vickers Wellington, a  shift that marked the end of the Fairey Battle's role as a bomber by UK-based squadrons, though  it persisted as a bomber overseas until mid-1941. While the Battle had distinct variants powered  by different versions of the Rolls-Royce Merlin, including the Mk II, Mk III, and Mk V,  these were essentially the same a
ircraft distinguished by their engines. Post-September  1940, the Battle withdrew from active duty, finding new purpose in training exercises  both in Britain and Canada. Additionally, it assumed roles as a target  tug, designated the Battle TT, and as a trainer, with variations such  as the Fairey Battle T and Battle IT. The Battle also left its  mark beyond British shores, with 16 light bomber versions serving in  the Belgian Air Service. Duncan Menzies, a Fairey test pilot, had showcased the
aircraft  to the Belgian Air Ministry in June 1937, leading to their acquisition and subsequent  deployment during the German invasion in May 1940. By the culmination of its production  on September 2, 1940, a total of 2,200 Fairey Battles had been constructed. Fairey, the  primary manufacturer, contributed 1,155 units; the Austin car company, as part of the  Shadow Factory Scheme, produced 1,029, and one lone specimen emerged from Hayes,  fulfilling orders placed by the end of 1939. Yet, despit
e its prolific production, the Fairey  Battle faced the harsh realities of war. Much like the German Stuka, it could only thrive in  regions blessed with local air superiority, a luxury it seldom enjoyed. Outmatched by the  formidable Messerschmitt Bf 109, the Battle, though not alone in its struggles, found itself  ill-suited for the perilous missions it was called upon to undertake, resulting in grievous  losses that marked its legacy in aviation history.

Comments

@mrjockt

The Battle was a fairly advanced design when it first appeared, the problem was that in the mid to late thirties advancements in aircraft design were happening so fast that many aircraft that were, like the Battle, advanced designs when ordered into production found themselves verging on obsolescence when they entered service.

@Mannock

And now the kicker. The Battle design was changed, shortened, and became the Fairey Fulmar. At 15 mph max faster than the Battle, it became a carrier based fighter. In its role, the Fulmar destroyed 140 aircraft. While it didn't fare well against the Zero and Oscar, it did manage to shoot down Japanese aircraft. And it was liked by its crews. That said, it was a British carrier based fighter, mainly serving in the Atlantic theater, coping with slower German marine aircraft, not 109s, 110s, and 190s. And it lead to the highly capable Fairey Firefly.

@Ralphieboy

There is a Fairey Battle on display at the Military Museum in Brussels, pieced together from the remains of six aircraft all shot down over Belgium in 1940. It was the highlight of my visit there.

@charleseldridge9365

My dad had his air gunnery training on the Battle. He became a Gunnery/wireless instructor and WAG 415 Squadron Royal Canadian Air Force OTU. He first flew into combat in Hampden Torpedo Bomber, finished second tour on Wellington MK XIII

@bingbong7316

My Dad trained in the Battle but ended up as Observer/Bomb Aimer on Blenheims during the Fall of France. Sorties went out, few if any returned. His turn came round, they went out, came back on foot just ahead of the German advance, got out via Cherbourg.

@f87max30

In Belgium it was nicknamed " the flying coffin". There is one on display at the Air Museum in Brussels.

@mavericmorph5358

All those wasted pilots.

@barkingmonkee

As some others have pointed out, the problem with the Battle had nothing to do with being 'obsolete'. Most other european air forces, including the Luftwaffe, had light bomber/attack aircraft with similar if not worse performance, protection and durability. The Luftwaffe operated the much more vulnerable HS 123 until at least mid 1943. The problem was that through the 1st half of 1940 the RAF still hadn't got a handle on how to plan and execute tactical strike missions, what kind of threat environment planes like the Battle could be sent into, and what level of fighter protection would be needed against an adversary like the Luftwaffe. From what I can tell there was no in-depth mission planning, minimal preliminary reconnaissance, no flak suppression and typically insufficient fighter support. Too often, too few aircraft were committed in an uncoordinated manner against alert and well prepared anti-aircraft defenses. No 1940 bomber was going to succeed when used in this way.

@glyn6170

I left school in 1980 and looklng for an engineering apprenticeship, like most of my contempories at that time, I applied for one at Fairey's at thier Crossley Road factory, Heaton Chapel, Stockport. The plane building had ended by then, at that time they built Bailey Bridges. The factory is still there and after many buy outs, the latest itteration of Fairy is still tading as WFEL (formerly Williams Fairey Engineering Limited) part of the KNDS group, building tactical military bridges. There was never any runway at the Stockport factory. Parts would be transported to, and then assembled, at Ringway Airport (now Manchester International Airport). This was not unusal in Manchester. A.V.Roe had a factory in Chadderton, but assembeled their planes at Woodford(not far from where I lived and where my brother did his apprenticeship), just outside Stockport. I believe that street lamps in the area were on hinges so they could allow the passage of wide loads. Stockport was a massive centre of engineering in the 80's, as well as Fairey's, there was Mirrless Blackstone, Ferranti Engineering, Simon Carves, Henry Simon and Simon Build (all part of the same group and on the same road, Bird Hall Lane), British Aerospace (now BAE) at Woodford, Reynold Chains, British Rail. All long gone and the sites redeveloped into housing estates or trading estates. Though the British Rail site is now leased by Alstom to maintain trains for CrossCountry, Northern Trains and Avanti West Coast. I didn't get an Apprenticeship at Fairy's, I eventually took up an apprenticeship as a Draughtsman/Technician Engineer with Broadhurst and Goodwin (Structural Engineers) in Manchester.

@anthonyeaton5153

An LAC Battle air gunner during the Battle of France shot down 2 Me 109s and damaged another before being shot down, he survived and was awarded the DFM. He came from Redcar in Yorkshire.

@Tom-Lahaye

Regarding the bombardments on the German invasion some details have to be corrected. There was no bombing on bridges over the river Meuse in Maastricht itself in 1940, this would only happen in 1944 by the USAF. The bombings from 10 to 12 of May 1940 were on bridges over the Albert canal just across the border in Belgium, the bridges were at Vroenhoven, Veldwezelt and Briegden. The first bombardment on the 10th of May was executed by a group of 9 Battles from the 5th group of the Belgian air force, 6 were lost and 3 damaged. 6 Gloster Gladiators escorted the Battles, of these 4 were lost when they encountered ME-109s. On the 11th the French air force tried again, also with no result, and then on the 12th it were RAF Battles which tried to bomb the bridges, also they failed and had losses. There is a monument at the bridge in Vroenhoven for all the men who lost their lives at these raids in an effort to slow down the German invasion.

@annehersey9895

This is amazing! I have studied WWII in depth through video and print and never once have I even heard the name Fairey Battle or even Fairey before! Thanks so much for broadening my knowledge! That’s why I love your channels!

@davidk2906

The Fairey Battle was a decent aircraft with excellent handling qualities with fairly good speed (257mph only 9 mph slower than the Blenheim ) compared to the other bombers at the time but was used using poor tactics. This was made all the worse by the fact that the German army had the finest anti aircraft protection in the world. However, the least that could of been done is to add another forward firing machine gun to the other wing and double up the one firing to the rear. Bad idea to bomb on the straight and level not far up. Why not bomb in a shallow dive to get extra speed and be less of a target? Today the Battle still looks sleek and handsome. Thanks

@nickw6175

i visited Belgium some years vack and the area around the rivers are dotted with little memorials to the crews , I understand that towards the end, the crews knew they wouldnt return and decided to drop one crew member to avoid three men dying

@clarencehopkins7832

Excellent stuff bro

@ravenclaw8975

Thanks for this video...well done! The Fairey aircraft company produced a series of fatal flops, including the Fairey Fulmar a naval fighter, which flew from Brit carriers, its replacement the Fairey Firefly, which was only marginallly better and the Fairey Barracuda, a lumbering torpedo bomber. This company's only aircraft of note was the Fairey Swordfish, very outdated, but notable for its successes against the Italian Fleet at Taranto and jamming the rudder of the Bismarck. The Americans, on the other hand, produced some amazing planes: the F6F Hellcat, the Grumman Avenger, the Dauntless, the Helldiver and probably the best plane of all, the F4U Corsair. I hope you have produced some videos on the aforementioned machines? Thanks for the research highlighting this abominable plane and the brave aircrew who were ordered to take it into battle.

@weetionghamjames-rh6pd

Trivia - I heard from an Air Force friend in Singapore that there is a road at the Tengah Air Base called Battle Road - named after the Fairey Battle although it was never based there. I like the Battle just as I like the Fulmar - sleek and beautiful. I have 5 Airfix Battle models built over 4 decades.

@markhindmarsh2811

The aircrew who flew in the Battle must have had nerves of steel . It was more or less a one way mission . We will never have a generation like that again . I always wondered if a Battle and a Ju87 ever engaged each other in what could be described as a highly unusual dogfight ?

@markhuebner7580

Interesting transitional aviation design, thanks!

@ianhenderson67

My uncle was a radio op / gunner on 150 Sqn in Battles. On two missions in the phoney war they dropped leaflets on Germany! His last Battle flight was bombing Boulogne to try to sink invasion barges. Moved on to Wellington’s and then the Lancaster. He flew with the Australians in Lancaster G George now the centrepiece of the Australian National War Memorial