vivo V30 Pro or vivo V30 - Worst Phone with Best Camera !!

So yes guys let's start So in today's video we have two new phones Vivo V30 and V30 Pro Both are same 🤣 Now the reason I got confused is that Just like the last time this time also the design of both the phones is almost similar Now last as we saw in V29 Pro that they gave a Mountain like texture which I personally felt were sea waves So now they have actually made it like sea waves And it looks very beautiful from the back And the camera module is now completely different as compared to their

large generation Here the camera module of both the phones is almost similar Now in the first sight you will feel that both the phones are same Then let me clear that both the phones are different The design of the camera module is slightly different in pro model As compared to non-pro because firstly here we can see a Zeiss logo And secondly this camera module have three cameras in Pro variant And the camera placement is also different So from this thing you can differentiate between pro and no

n pro Although the in hand feel is same in both of them They are very thin phones And vivo even said that it is world's slimmest phone with 5000 mAh battery And they also gave a award to it They are giving awards to their own phones So vivo improved the design But they didn't improve the thing which they had to improve Still both phones have mono speakers and the haptics are also springy in both Which is better on this price point in their own sub brand phones Now let's move towards the display

which is almost similar by looks and specswise here the specifications are same Because it have AMOLED panel with 120 Hertz And have 1.5 K display And you can stream HDR content in both of them and they can show one billion colors And this time Vivo have added 2800 nits peak brightness in both the phones And they call it ultra clear sunlight display Please swear about it Vivo But I think their displays very well Because all the phones I used in this price bracket had very solid outdoor visibilit

y Even if I compare it with their own sub brand IQOO Then their peak brightness is very low Especially the Pro variant For pro weather it's indoor or outdoor it feels very dull Specially while using the camera I thought the brightness was on half but it was on full brightness and even after that it was dull so I think there is a major brightness issue in them according to their price point Although as I already said that the 2800 nits peak brightness that company claims is typical peak brightnes

s So when you stream HDR content Then it will show the bright part on 2800 nits for some time But its outdoor peak brightness is of 1200 nits only Now although the display of both of them looks same from the front But the non-pro variant have a red tint in its display Due to which whenever you stream non HDR content It makes the human skin tone very reddish But when you stream HDR content Then due to this thing the display looks better than pro variant And brightness is also slightly more while

streaming HDR content But the biggest problem in both of them is that they are quite high price phones even after that when you stream in 4K in both the phones Then they are not able to play that properly Specially non-pro lags alot But pro will also be launched around 40K and it is also having a lot of jittering And while playing the video in 4K if you use the UI of Youtube At that time non pro variant just stucks Because we get a lot of jittering in youtube Rest both the display can stream HDR

on Netflix and both of them have the power of in-display fingerprint sensor about the speed and recognition I have already said that no phone gives better Fingerprint sensor than Vivo And I can say this thing here But it would have been great if the position was slightly upward as the phones are long so slightly upper side would have been comfortable Now one thing is out of my mind that when we use any phone then it have option for refresh rate like smart switch , high refresh rate or 60Hz it a

lso have that , if we use smart switch then it switches the refresh rate as per the content assume I am watching 60 Hz content , then it will switch to 60Hz on 90 FPS it will switch to 90Hz and while scrolling , it will switch to 120 Hz But after applying the smart switch whole phone works in 90Hz due to which when I used both the phones for the first time I felt that even on 120 Hz the phones were not smooth but later when I enabled FPS meter I got to know that they were on 90 Hertz But when yo

u open any photo in gallery At that time the animation will be on 120 Hertz Due to which it feels smooth at that part So Vivo have tricked us So now how 120 Hz will work ? So for that you will need to enable high refresh rate after that maximum applications will work on 120 Hz And if you want then you can also select the apps from your side that which app you want to use on 120 Hz And here it also works like smart switch Like if you're not using anything then it will switch to 60 hertz and on sc

rolling it will switch to 120 hz So here I don't understand the use of smart switch They should have named that as 90 Hz Let's talk about the main highlight of Vivo that are cameras So both of them have a 50MP front camera setup And you can do digital zoom from zero .8 X to 2X And there is a great field of view in the front camera And in the same way back camera have 50MP triple camera setup in pro variant which is 2X telephoto , 1x main camera and a 50 MP Ultra-wide Now in the last generation I

said that the Ultra-wide was not good at all It was having smudge edges But here let's see what they have done after giving a 50MP camera Rest in non pro you get a 50MP main camera and a 50MP Ultra-side as a 50MP Ultra-wide So without wasting any time here let's move towards the video Now here we have one more advantage in pro that here you can record in 4K 60FPS from the front At this time we're getting great stabilization And non-pro only have 4K 30FPS option Rest here its stabilization is al

so weak So according to price there is this difference So here the color looks slightly better in Pro variant And here the light control is good in both the phones But as you go in direct light Then in non-pro it was unexpected that it will do such good light control And will show this great skin tone Rest in both of them you get stabilization up to 1080p 30FPS in front So here this thing is similar in both of them Rest the camera of both the phones is not for video recording No matter if it's o

f 50MP or 108MP See both of them are offended and have turned off the lights Though you yourself can see that in the terms of details both the phones are trash And for the skin tone I was again surprised to see that the non-pro was better than pro Pro makes the skin very white whether it's 4K or 1080p And here also both of them have stabilization in same settings only So this thing is also similar Now it is unexpected that the cameras of non pro are performing better than pro variant in every si

tuation Even if you enable the portrait video mode Then see the skin tone it's better in non pro But again they are offended But the pro variant have a collaboration with Zeiss Due to which you get extra filters in cinematic video mode In which the aspect ratio is different But here I haven’t seen much difference in the quality Edge detection and colors were almost similar Now here when you click the photo from both the phones Then there is a slight difference in the colors when you click the ph

otos of the greenery But when you click the photo of any person Then the cameras of non pro performs better than pro in colors Because there show eye pleasing colors And you yourself can see this thing Rest I will add the link of Google drive in the description And the photos will be deleted after one month So here it is clearly seen That the light control of non pro is slightly better than pro Because pro focuses on making the photo bright And when there is light with brightening then it looks

blown out And you can also see this thing Now earlier also we have tried vivo phones with zeiss collaboration And there we saw that it used to cut the reflection of the sun But here we can still see the reflection And it's almost same like non-pro variant So there's nothing different in reflections But in the rest part the collaboration is seen in the filters Because you get a lot of zeiss filters in portrait mode which also takes really great photos And this power is not present in non-pro But

one thing is similar to Zeiss in non pro variant which is that you can select between natural color and normal color while clicking the photos which is in both the phones the only difference is that in pro it is named with Zeiss Rest here when we clicked photos in portrait mode Then the light control is slightly better in Pro But as far as I know the price difference will be ₹10,000 According to that the difference is not that much Now in some conditions non pro also performs matter because of c

olors Rest details are almost similar But here one thing as we get 2X telephoto lens in pro So here we get some extra details during the time of telephoto And in non pro the details are slightly less But it's not a big difference as per the expected difference in price Other than that light control and all is good in 2X photo Now someone asked me that what is the purpose of this light under the camera So earlier it was in circle shape but now its in square with round edges And its intensity is g

ood enough You can convert it from warm tone to cool tone And it captures photos like this You can check if you like them But actually its practical use is slightly less Other than that I noticed one more difference that pro takes faded colors in low light colors And non pro shows vibrant colors so it will be your pick But for me non-pro looks better Rest they have done a great work by giving a 50MP Ultra-wide camera Details are good and light control and all is also nice And again the camera of

pro performs slightly better in ultra-wide Because here contrast and highlights are slightly better Other than that if we move towards the front camera Then there is a difference in skin tone Here I don't know why but non pro looks better Pro is boosting the black color a lot due to which it looks little strange Rest the light control and all is also good in non pro You can see that yourself And non pro have a slightly warm tone which most of the people likes And the scene is almost similar wit

h portrait mode So here as much I have seen There isn't much difference in the cameras of Non pro and pro the thing is that if you like vibrant colors then go with non Pro But if you like cool tone , need a 2X telephoto better details and if you can pay some extra money then you can go with pro And super macro mode is a special thing in pro variant By which you can click some photos like this It captures great photos Now let's talk about the performance Here the pro have dimensity 8200 Processor

And non-pro have snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor Now to be honest as per the price point the score is not that good in both of them Because the score in both of them were not even 1 million Here Vivo's own sub brand in the same segment is giving 1.6 million score which is IQOO Neo 9 Pro , you may already know So in front of that their performance is nothing But here let me tell you , to know about the gaming we also ran 3D mark test In which the stability of both the phones was 99% which is really

great And scores were also great But here the temperature of pro goes a bit higher and as we have already seen that the processors of Mediatek heats more So it's maximum temperature was 45 degrees Rest if we talk about the normal usage then as I said that make sure to use both the phones on high refresh rate then also it will be fun using it , otherwise the smoothness will not be that good And here non pro also have 2-4 extra pre-installed apps as compared to pro which is somewhat partial and t

he storage type in both the phones is different Because non-pro have UFS 2.2 storage type and LPDDR4X ram which I think they should have given UFS 3.1 storage But they wanted to give that in Pro as it have UFS 3.1 storage and DDR5 RAM So here also cost cutting is done in the hardware Rest in non pro as we have UFS 2.2 storage and a ok ok processor So that is actually visible When you use any heavy application or do gaming and after that if you open any normal app Then there when you open or clos

e apps , you will get jittering Rest we don’t get 90 FPS in both of them in BGMI But ultra HD settings are enabled And if you play on extreme then both of them handles decently But pro handles it slightly better as compared to non pro Means you can do casual gaming in both of them Now if we move towards the battery Then both of them have 5000 mAh battery and 80W fast charging Both of them charges completely in around 35-40 minutes And if we talk about the battery backup Then I started testing bo

th of them after charging 100% And I don’t know why pro variant consumed more battery And I will talk more about this in my review So for that make sure to subscribe the channel So these were my first impressions about Vivo V30 and V30 pro Rest you guys tell me that which phone looks better to you But as much I experienced both of them if you need a phone for looks and cameras Otherwise you can wait for comparison with other phones So that was it guys for today's video So let's meet in another c

ool and exciting video till then stay tuned with HFV Unbox guys !! Byeee !!! 👊👊