Five years ago, 346 people were killed in two plane crashes that happened five months apart, in Indonesia and Ethiopia. Both were Boeing 737 Max 8 planes. Then, this past January, Boeing came inches from yet another catastrophe as a door plug blew off an Alaska Airlines 737 Max 9 plane at 16,000 feet shortly after taking off from Portland, Oregon. Preliminary reports said the door panel that flew off the Max 9 appeared to be missing four key bolts.
The Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into the Alaska Airlines incident. And the Federal Aviation Administration said it found dozens of problems after auditing Boeing’s manufacturing process.
While Boeing and the FAA have responded more aggressively to the Max 9 issue, the FAA production audit found multiple instances where both Boeing and fuselage maker Spirit Aerosystems allegedly failed to comply with manufacturing quality control problems.
Boeing announced major management changes including CEO Dave Calhoun, who was brought in to get the company out of the max crisis in 2019, just announced he’ll be stepping down at the end of 2024.
CNBC explores how the 737 Max crisis unfolded and what the future holds for Boeing’s best selling jet.
Chapters:
2:22 Evolution of the Boeing 737
5:42 Missing bolts
9:36 A merger and a shift
11:09 What’s next?
Produced, Shot and Edited by: Erin Black
Supervising Producer: Jeniece Pettitt
Animations: Jason Reginato
Editorial Support: Leslie Josephs
Additional Production: Katie Tarasov
» Subscribe to CNBC: https://cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBC
» Subscribe to CNBC TV: https://cnb.cx/SubscribeCNBCtelevision
About CNBC: From 'Wall Street' to 'Main Street' to award winning original documentaries and Reality TV series, CNBC has you covered. Experience special sneak peeks of your favorite shows, exclusive video and more.
Want to make extra money outside of your day job? Take CNBC’s new online course How to Earn Passive Income Online to learn about common passive income streams. Register today and save 50% with discount code EARLYBIRD: https://cnb.cx/3Iwblnk
Connect with CNBC News Online
Get the latest news: https://www.cnbc.com/
Follow CNBC on LinkedIn: https://cnb.cx/LinkedInCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Instagram: https://cnb.cx/InstagramCNBC
Follow CNBC News on Facebook: https://cnb.cx/LikeCNBC
Follow CNBC on Threads: https://cnb.cx/threads
Follow CNBC News on X: https://cnb.cx/FollowCNBC
#CNBC
Why The Boeing 737 Max Has Been Such A Mess
Five years ago, 346 people
were killed in two plane crashes that happened
five months apart in Indonesia and Ethiopia. Both planes were Boeing
737 Max eight seconds. Then this past January,
Boeing came inches from yet another catastrophe
as a door plug blew off an Alaska Airlines 737 Max
nine plane at 16,000ft shortly after taking off
from Portland, Oregon. Nightmare scenario for
passengers. The clothes on one child
sucked out. This was no surprise. Unfortunately,
the company has struggled might
ily with
manufacturing and we've had over 20 production
quality defects. You know, it's hard to
keep up with all of them. No one was seriously
injured in the accident, but the blown off panel
produced a force so strong that some headrests and
seatbacks were ripped from the cabin. Fortunately,
no one was sitting in the two seats next to the
panel. I saw the picture,
everybody saw the opening, but what I really saw was
the empty seat. I imagine every human
being who would see that understands the
severity
and the consequence. There was a time when
people said, if it's not Boeing, I'm not going
now. There are passengers who
avoid or are scared to get on Boeing airplanes. The Department of Justice
has opened a criminal investigation into the
Alaska Airlines incident, and the Federal Aviation
Administration said it found dozens of problems
after auditing Boeing's manufacturing process. It just raises issues
about the production at Boeing. What's going on?
There have been a series of problem
s over the last
few years, and we just need to get our arms
around that. Boeing announced major
management changes. Ceo Dave Calhoun, who was
brought in to get the company out of the Max
crisis in 2019, just announced he'll be
stepping down at the end of 2024. We have another mountain
to climb. Let's not avoid what
happened with Alaska Air. Let's not avoid the call
for action. We will get through that.
And I've committed myself to the board to do
exactly that. Boeing's stock has also
been on a d
ecline. It hit an all time high
in 2019, before the Max crash in Ethiopia
plummeted during the pandemic, and is down
over 25% so far in 2024. My sense is until you get
an all clear, the stock will probably be stuck in
a range. And you know, the key
question, really, I mean, the multi-billion dollar
question is when does the all clear and we just
don't know yet. CNBC explores how the 737
Max crisis unfolded, and what the future holds for
Boeing's best selling jet. The official 737
christening cer
emony took place in the new final
Assembly building on January 17th, 1967. The first Boeing 737
debuted in 1967. Over the last few
decades, strong demand for the twin engine
narrowbody jets led to many evolutions. Of the
737 family, there have been over 10,007 37
seconds made, and it's flown over 30 billion
passengers. The plane is so popular
that Boeing estimates a 737 takes off, or lands
every 1.5 seconds. If you've flown, you've
likely flown at some point in your life on a 737. It's one of th
e most
commonly used aircraft by airlines around the
world. The commercial aircraft
market is dominated by Boeing and Airbus. Together, their planes
represented over 75% of aircraft flying last
year. The two compete on
various types of jetliners, especially
narrow body planes like the 737 and A320, which
account for close to 60% of the global fleet. In 2011, Boeing was under
pressure after Airbus launched an upgrade to
its existing narrow body plane called the A320neo,
which stands for New Engin
e option. The plane
was more fuel efficient and could save airlines
money. American Airlines and
exclusive Boeing customer at the time, was ready to
place a big order with Airbus and told Boeing it
would have to move quickly to win the airline over. Boeing took a lot of
shortcuts in developing this aircraft, and those
shortcuts literally bit Boeing in its behind. Designing a new airplane
could take up to a decade and billions of dollars
in investment. Boeing decided to
re-engine the 737 with a n
ew engine variant, which
was more fuel efficient and called it the 737
Max. It's a very simple reason
why Boeing was looking at Re-engining, essentially
the 737, which had already been around for decades. It's cheaper. So instead
of building a plane or designing a plane from
scratch, what they did was made some changes to the
existing aircraft to get planes to market faster
and then not to lose out on orders to their rival,
Airbus. It offers four different
sizes of the aircraft the Max, seven, e
ight, nine,
and ten. The Max eight received
FAA certification in 2017. During development,
Boeing engineers observed the nose tendency to
pitch up during a specific extreme maneuver. This led to the design of
a software called the Maneuvering
Characteristics Augmentation System, or
MCAS, which would push the airplane's nose down in
the Max eight crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia. Mcas was activated after
receiving inaccurate sensor data. It
repeatedly pointed the nose downward until it
struck th
e ground. Pilots on both flights
fought to override the system, but both ended in
fatal crashes. Pilots of all Max planes
were not made aware of MCAS existence until two
weeks after the first crash. It wasn't until
after the second crash, nearly five months later,
that those planes were grounded. The grounding
lasted for 20 months, the longest in aviation
history. A report from Congress
found numerous design, management and regulatory
failures by both Boeing and the FAA. It detailed what it
call
ed a deeply disturbing picture of cultural
issues, and said that it will take a long time and
serious efforts to thoroughly resolve. In the five years since,
Boeing has spent billions trying to recover, but
its reputation took another damaging hit
after January's Max nine door incident. It's a different set of
lessons drilling holes wrong, not putting in
bolts right in. In one one sense, the
quality issues are much more simple where the the
MCAS issue, the control system issue that they
had on t
he max before was in many ways more
insidious, because it was just a fundamental design
flaw in the airplane. When the first series of
accidents occurred, killing 346 people,
Boeing was almost in denial of any problems. The most recent problem,
Boeing, to its credit, stepped up to the plate
and they said, look, this is a problem. We have to
investigate it and we have to fix it. And they've
owned it. While Boeing and the FAA
have responded more aggressively to the Max
nine issue, reports and audi
ts of the accident
are uncovering new problems. Preliminary
reports said the door panel that flew off the
Max nine appeared to be missing four key bolts. Boeing has also said that
there is not paperwork that has documented the
door plug getting opened and getting closed, while
wrapping up manufacturing on that plane. The FAA production audit
found multiple instances where both Boeing and
fuselage maker spirit AeroSystems allegedly
failed to comply with manufacturing quality
control problems. The
fuselage of the 737
Max aircraft is made by a company in Wichita called
spirit AeroSystems. No relation, by the way,
to Spirit Airlines. There were issues beyond
what happened on the January 5th flight. There
were planes with mis drilled holes. There were
parts of the fuselage that were not up to standard. Spirit AeroSystems used to
be Boeing. Wichita. Boeing spun off
its Wichita unit as spirit AeroSystems to improve
profitability. That puts the financial
squeeze on spirit AeroSystems to build
the
fuselages for the lowest possible cost. Clearly, this has come
with some intangible cost in terms of quality
control. About 70% of Spirit's
revenue last year came from making parts from
Boeing. It's their biggest customer, and then about
25% is coming from Airbus. Boeing is now looking at
purchasing spirit. Some say like it'll give
them a little bit more control or a little bit
more visibility into its supply chain. Experts also suggest the
change in workforce post-pandemic could be
affectin
g. Quality. And it's not a
Boeing specific issue, particularly post-Covid
getting experienced labor. There was a lot of
retirement. You think, well, you have a
workforce that maybe wasn't experienced where
there are several variables going on within
an experienced workforce where, you know, quite
innocently, they just left something off and it
wasn't caught by the system. That's where you
worry, because that should have been caught by the
system. And then the big question is, if that
wasn't caug
ht, what else hasn't been caught? Boeing has also been under
pressure to ramp up production. The company
has delivered 1,462 Max aircraft, but has 4,752
unfulfilled Max orders. This has caused a number
of issues for the airlines. Some of Boeing's biggest
customers are having to scale back their growth
plans a little bit. United is pausing pilot
hiring for a couple of months. Southwest
Airlines is having to cut some of its flight
schedules for 2024 because the planes are arriving
late. I'm disapp
ointed that the
manufacturing challenges do keep happening at
Boeing. This isn't new. I'm disappointed in that. Southwest and United have
the most Boeing 737 Max planes in their fleets,
so the grounding of these planes has had a ripple
effect. Airbus, meanwhile, has
been slowly chipping away at Boeing's market share. Boeing had a big increase
in net orders from 774 planes in 2022 to 1,314
planes in 2023, but Airbus had over 2,000 orders
last year. It has delivered more
planes and received more o
rders for the fifth
consecutive year in a row. In the late 1990s, Boeing
merged with McDonnell Douglas. It was an
aircraft manufacturer which made commercial
planes like the MD 11 and MD 80, as well as space
and military aircraft. There is a belief that the
focus at Boeing has shifted since this merger
with McDonnell Douglas to profitability, as opposed
to, uh, engineering excellence. I think one of the big,
you know, indicators of that was moving the
corporate headquarters away from any of the
big
manufacturing sites. After the 1997 merger,
Boeing moved its corporate headquarters after 85
years in Seattle to Chicago and more recently
to Arlington, Virginia. 27 years later, experts
and CEOs are still blaming that merger for the more
recent issues. My assessment is, you
know, this goes all the way back to the McDonnell
Douglas merger, and it started a change in
culture. If I were. Making recommendations to
the company, I would say, yeah, sure. Management
should be located in the Puget S
ound region, their
biggest manufacturing site, and in fact, they
should be sleeping on the factory floor at this
point to get everything kind of back in order. Many of Boeing's other
programs have also faced problems. They've faced
cost overruns, and they've faced quality control
problems. Profitability, of course,
matters, but you're not going to be a profitable
company if your customers don't believe you have
the products they need to buy. And airlines have
been opting for Airbus airplanes a l
ot more
recently than Boeing. Boeing had already been
under pressure to deliver more airplanes. It has a backlog of over
6,000 total orders, and its leaders don't want to
lose more market share to Airbus, which had a
backlog of over 8,000 planes at the end of
2023. You really only have two
suppliers of large commercial airplanes, and
Airbus can't do it all. Will Boeing turn itself
around? Yeah. Most certainly it will. Um, it's going to take
time, though. The eyes of the airline
world are focused
on Boeing and the FAA to
make sure the 737 Max's in production are produced
without flaws. Two months after the
Alaska Airlines panel blew out, the National
Transportation Safety Board chair criticized
the company for its lack of cooperation in the Max
nine probe. Boeing CEO has said that
he's very serious about addressing the quality
control problems and that it's their main priority
right now, but customers are waiting for their
airplanes. The 737 Max nines have
returned to the skies, but the
Max seven and ten
have yet to be certified and are years behind
schedule, facing more rigorous testing
requirements. After the other Max issues. We've considered multiple
manufacturers. We look at every
aircraft. Other manufacturers are also
having issues with aircraft and delivery.
And so Boeing having some production issues. We've
enhanced our oversight of Boeing's production
process. In fact, we did that in 2022. And so that will
continue. And we might even bring it up a little
bit. I'm disa
ppointed. And
especially because Boeing is they're not only our
most important partner, they're one of the most
important companies in the country. They're
important to the United States. Some of Boeing's best
customers have expressed frustration at the
company for the delays. We've heard from United
Airlines, for example, saying, you know, stop
building the Max ten, a plane that isn't even
certified yet and build the ones that you can
deliver to us, and we can fly tomorrow. Southwest's CEO. Thi
s is a CEO that runs
an all Boeing 737 airline, one of Boeing's best
customers, saying that Boeing needs to become a
better company. That's very strong
language coming from Southwest Airlines. Boeing has replaced the
CEO of its commercial airplane business, Stan
Deal, with Stephanie Pope, and will now begin a CEO
search to replace outgoing CEO Dave Calhoun. I want somebody who knows
how to handle a big, long, long cycle business like
ours. It's not just the
production of the airplane, it's the
d
evelopment of the next airplane. It'll be a $50
billion investment. Despite significant
management changes, experts still say it will
be a long road for Boeing to get back to its once
excellent reputation for safety over profits. Product life cycles can be
decades, and you have an investor base that wants
returns. You know, maybe this
week, if not this quarter, and the two are
misaligned. So I think investors have to be
willing to take a little back seat while the
company is focusing on quality
compliance. You can't force the
financials on top of everything else. So how
long does it take? My guess is it's going to
take a while. What's a while? Probably
a couple of years. Boeing has a very proud
history. I certainly hope to see
Boeing regain the mojo, the magic that the
company once had. Because to be very
honest, if Boeing doesn't regain that focus, not
only is Airbus going to, I think, win more orders,
but Boeing becomes potentially weaker
against other new entrants such as Comac from
China. We are at the early stages
of responding to, in my view, an Overexercised
supply chain and an Overexercised Boeing
factory, and we're going to calm it down. We're
going to get ahead of all of the issues that either
the FAA and way more importantly, our own
people bring to our attention, and we'll get
ahead of it. That will happen.
Comments
McDonnell Douglas bought Boeing with Boeing's money. That's what happened.
What happened? We all know exactly what happened. GREED.
They got whistleblower killed!
So basically they lost millions trying to save pennies
There is a great line from the miniseries "Chernobyl" - “Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth, Sooner or later that debt is paid”.
If it is Boeing I ain't going.
The love of money is indeed the root of all evil
If America don't hold Boeing accountable then rest if the world will by not buying anymore Boeing planes. It will sink America reputation.
Most strange thing is that problems with quality leads to decrease in stock price which directly harms investors and customers. So penny savings are just stupid in such situations
OBVIOUSLY..PROFIT OVER SAFETY!!!
If It's Boeing, I'm Not Going.™
Why the ceo still talking about pleasing the board? Try pleasing your engineers and customers. Lmao.
those in the FAA should also be jailed
The executives "stepping down" are just dodging responsibility! It executives are not charged nothing will ever change!!
When you hire MBA employees over engineers this is the result
It’s what people have been saying for years about everything: they don’t make ‘em how they used to. Whatever you could possibly think of like, new cars, houses, electronics, appliances, etc, are crap now. Nothing is built to last anymore.
An airplane manufacturer shouldn't be on the stock market. You shouldn't care about maximizing profits there. It was just pure greed.
What happened is that in the late '90's the board decided that the company didn't need to be a manufacturing company, it needed to be a profit generation company. It moved HQ away from Seattle, they removed engineers for management positions and replaced them with 'financial' people, they spun off parts of the manufacturing (Spirit is an example), and pushed everyone for profit-driven results as opposed to quality product results. Now we see people pointing these things out, when they were pointed out back when they happened. The financial leadership hollowed out a storied manufacturing company, and have finally found out that there is a limit to how far you can run a company for pure profit. The current CEO was not necessarily the issue, just like the previous one was not the issue. They only do what the board tells them.
This is what happens when you value the opinions of MBAs over engineers.
Stephanie Pope is another bean-counter, not an engineer. Good choice.