It's a pleasure to be here
with everyone tonight. What an amazing turnout. This is great. We're all
here to talk about kelp. But as we get deeper
into this conversation, it will soon be clear
that this is really a discussion centered
around climate change and its impact on
natural systems we've perhaps taken a
bit for granted lately. Dating back to 2013 when I was just
finishing up undergrad, one thing has been constant
across all my research, and that's the impact
of climate change. It's 2024 n
ow. It's been a short
while since I started. But climate change
has somehow touched every project that
I've worked on. That's the backdrop to
our discussion today. On that note, before we even
start talking about kelp, I want to share the path that finally brought me
here to the forest. Back then in 2013, I was studying the
life history of baby market squid in the
context of ocean warming. Shout out to my mentor,
Charles Pretty, whose finger you can see
up there modeling just how tiny these palp
able squid
look without a microscope. I remember all our
fieldwork brought us in and around La
Jolla kelp forest, which if anyone remembers, used to be so thick
near the cove. You had to veer way off and take the long way south
past Point La Jolla, otherwise you risk getting the boat stuck in some
seriously thick kelp. All that fun with
squid soon opened the door to a job at NOAA, where before grad school I got to research
even more on squid, but this time alongside other important coastal
and o
pen ocean fisheries. But it didn't take long before I was ready to go
back to school, so I started up my
master's research, which brought me right back
into the kelp forests. Along the way, I started working with the
Department of Fish and Wildlife doing
albony restoration work. This is right about
when I realized that what's probably a very obvious
connection to us all now. No matter what the
topic, every system or organism I've
studied to date has all but collapsed
in the same window. If I'm t
he common
denominator in all this, I am I the problem, is it me? I don't know. But needless to say, I do believe research
focuses can be influenced by the major global
themes that happen to be especially present
during the infancy of a scientific career and the climate change has
certainly inspired mind. Moving into my current field of study and how everything
is connected. Although I started working in this environment in the context
of abalone restoration, I realized the
foundation species its
elf is also at risk
and deserves attention. Otherwise, there's no home
for the abalone anyways. One more folks seem to know about kelp forests these days, which is exciting compared
to even a few years ago. I figured as people start hearing more about kelp forests, they're going to start
asking questions too. I decided it was time to see how good our public resources
are on this topic. I asked ChatGPT my
first question ever, what is a kelp forest? And the response
was pretty spot on, but I'll ex
pand on it a
little bit further here. Kelp forests are coastal cold
water habitats dominated by large brown seaweeds for about 130 different
species globally. They are hard bottomed dwellers that form dense three
dimensional stands, which creates a pretty
unique habitat. Then I looked up what
people would see if they asked about the importance
of kelp forests. Most of the results in
this were accurate too. They're the base of
the food web and a habitat they
create themselves, which also means th
ey're important for
fisheries and tourism. If that's not enough, kelp
is in your toothpaste, it's in your shampoo,
your medicine, and even your
favorite ice cream. It's all because kelp contains a natural thickener
that's fantastic at keeping things
smooth and mixed. But there's some information out there on a topic that needs a little bit more clarification and I want to make
sure we cover it here. That's this idea of
carbon superstration. I want to highlight what we
know about kelp and carbon.
We know there are
amazing fixtures of carbon in that they're
prosynthesizing all the time, taking in lots of
CO_ 2 as they grow. We know that kelp
grows super fast, which equates to a bunch
of carbon storage. But there's a big
question mark of how long that carbon
is stored and ultimately where it
all ends up once it enters or leaves
the kelp system. It's a complicated challenge and currently a growing
area of research. But I need to stress that for that research to grow
or even continue, it re
lies on kelp forests
continuing to exist. I want to review a
familiar pair of problems, namely long term and
interannual climate change, especially in the local
context here in San Diego. Climate change is affecting
ocean conditions for kelp and here's how they're changing in our
backyard at UCSD. This is the temperature
off the scripts peer over the last century
and we can see by the green line that it's
generally increasing, and as a function of these
elevated ocean temperatures we can see ran
ge expansion
of competitors and grazers has caused
significant decline in the size and density of our Southern California kelp stance. In addition to the
long term increase due to anthropogenic
climate change, the ENSO cycle creates these periods of warmer water and lower nutrient availability. The red in this
figure represents increased sea surface height which corresponds to temperature increase during an El Nino. When that happens on our coast, kelp is subject to thermal
and nutrient stress.
For some context before
the 2015 El Nino, the all time La Jolla
kelp high was in 2013, with over a million
square meters. That's 250 acres or about 200 football fields
of canopy coverage. Then during the 201 El Nino, La Jolla lost over 90%
of its kelp and it still hasn't recovered
to anywhere near the values since back in 2013. We know the patterns of
loss observed here in La Jolla are also reflected
across San Diego, the bottom eastern Pacific,
and also globally, where it's motivated groups
to
begin restoration work, and recognizing the value of local action in a
global context, we've formed a
multidisciplinary team here in an effort to understand, reverse, or prevent further
kelp loss in San Diego. This is our team where we have
the pleasure of combining expertise across psychology
and ecology here at UCSD, under my advisor Jen Smith, Molecular Biology over at Salk Institute
with Todd Michael, Developmental Biology at
UCLA with Siobhan Braybrook, and Kelp Forest
Restoration Ecology u
nder Cayne Layton at
University of Tasmania. I'd like to add that this
collaboration also happens to represent part of my growing
PhD thesis committee. It's no coincidence
that the goals of this project stem from my graduate research
here at Scripps. Our work has four
main objectives. First, we're looking at long
term kelp forest health as it changes through time, especially with
habitat suitability for kelp transplants in mind. We're basically asking how do rising ocean
temperatures driven by c
limate change affect health and the dynamics of kelp
beds in San Diego? Second, we're uncovering whether significant genomic
diversity exists in San Diego kelp forests. Our question here being,
do genetic variations in San Diego kelp beds impact their ability to
withstand ocean warming? Third, we're testing how
well local kelp tolerates environmental stress
and whether there are any differences in performance
cross populations, in other words, how do the
microscopic life stages of San Diego kelp
respond
to ocean heat waves? Given our growing
kelp cultivation pipeline and seed banks, essentially our kelp nurseries, can we preserve kelp diversity
before the next heat wave? Last, we're collecting
field data at permanent monitoring
sites that will eventually support
experimental kelp restoration. Here's where we want to know how transplanted kelp fair
in new environments and whether there's any link to thermal tolerance we might find in our previous objective. All of this work is ongoing a
t various stages in parallel. Going into some detail
for these objectives, this map shows the
kelp forest canopy at our permanent scuba
monitoring sites in La Jolla which we're now
serving on a seasonal basis, and explaining that
panel that teal area is anywhere that has ever had
kelp between now and 1984, and why is where kelp
was detected in 2022? Note that the MPA seen inside that dash box also protects
the southern half of La Jolla kelp forests
which we've consistently found to have higher p
ersistence than in the northern
regions of Ohio. It's this exact same
pattern which motivated the distribution of
our research sites which are labeled by
those black dots. It's also where we
hope to identify the community and environmental
drivers that could be forcing the differences
in recovery and persistence between
these two regions of kelp. All this is ahead of
transplant experiments along the regions
of North La Jolla which historically had kelp, but have not
recovered since last. A speci
al shout out
to Keenan Chan and Rich Walsh for helping me build out these sites
for the summer. It was some serious work, and now we're on our way. Our second objective
involves sequencing DNA from kelp across
our local populations, which then reveals the
level of diversity and potential for pre-existing stress tolerance
among individuals. Essentially, what we're asking here is whether there's already an inability present in these populations to adapt to any degree of climate change, and that in
turn can guide
us in selecting natural kelp strains that might be more ideal for restoration
work down the road. An exciting aspect of this project is that
we got to develop a giant kelp reference
corresponding specifically to
here in San Diego, and that's what we'll use to
map all the local samples we collect as we start to collect catalog diversity in
these populations. Here's a real time sneak peek of what that
diversity looks like with the few samples that we've
already sequenced so far. Al
l you need to know
for this figure is that every dot corresponds
to an individual kelp, and the distance between
each dot tells us how similar or different those kelp are across all the regions
that we've sampled. The closer the dots, the less genetic differences
between the kelp. But the bottom line
is giant kelp in southern California are proving to be genetically different, even within San Diego, which means there's a
better chance we might find kelp out there that's already more tolerant to
heat stress. The third aspect
we're tackling tests. How well the early
life stages of local kelp tolerates heat stress in the context of
photophysiological, microscopic, and cellular
level responses. In the same process,
it will also determine the thermal thresholds for these populations in our backyard. We'll focus our efforts
on six seaweed taxa that represent the most
abundant habitat forming kelp species
in San Diego. From the ground up this involves collecting reproductive material
out in t
he kelp forest, growing in the lab to create other cultures and seed banks, essentially our nursery, before finally putting
these specimens through growth experiments that simulate
environmental stress on par with what they'd
experience during a marine heat wave. On the topic of kelp
nurseries for my research, it's been an absolute
pleasure to work with Oriana, who's been documenting
every detail and all the differences of my baby kelp from
the very beginning. Yeah, thanks Oriana. We don't often
see or think of this tiny life stage when
it comes to kelp, but they're just so darn cute, like little potato chips or
basil leaves and they've even got these tiny little
hold fast. I love it. All of this work feeds
into our final objective, which tests restoration
techniques in the Hoya, focusing specifically on
macrocystis or giant kelp. We're testing its performance
in the context of all the data we're collecting
in our previous objectives. Revisiting those
transplant sides are introduced in
our first objective, they all share two main
ground truth criteria. First, they're at a depth
of about 15 meters, or 50 feet, with consistent
hard bottom reef structure, and second, they'd previously hosted
thriving kelp forests, but now they're largely
devoid of giant kelp. Following methods tested in previous restoration
experiments by Leighton Johnson and Tasmania, we'll experimentally
outplant kelp grown on polycarbonate tiles, fastened to the sea floor
with expansion bolts, all in spatial
arrangements that are comparable to their
natural kelp densities. Ultimately, this
last aspect should uncover if the health
and survivorship of juvenile macrocystis are related to either their thermal
tolerance or their genetic line. Collectively, we've set
up a project such that these findings could inform future kelp restoration efforts, particularly in
regions affected by heat stress induced
kelp decline. The work started a few years ago with early support from
some UCSC seed funds, along wit
h an AUS scholarship. As the project gained momentum, we received a SeaTrees research
grant to expand the work, and all of that just landed Sea Grant's 2024 support for accelerating kelp research and
restoration in California. We're excited about the
funding and equally excited to share an upcoming update
on CW permitting. We've had a specific use
permit application process for upwards of last year, and now it's in
the final stages. We'll need this permit in place to start experimental
restorati
on, and to collect more
DNA samples from across San Diego's
protected areas. We've definitely made
some significant strides, humbly starting from a repurposed mini fridge
for all the kelp culturing, before we advanced to
dedicated incubators. Alongside, we've refined
our DNA techniques to craft a San Diego
macrocystis reference genome, and all this progress underpinned
by Sea Grant funding, has been amplified by
the strong support of our global community
and positive engagement with the
Birch Aq
uarium, the Kelp Forest Alliance and the Nature Conservancy
to name a few. We're now set for the
next phase of this work. Eagerly waiting Sea
Grant funding to come in and the scientific
permit approval, and that will scale up this kelp biomass that
we're trying to collect, all for the upcoming
heat stress experiments, the DNA sequencing, and
our transplant trials. I know a bit of this talk
has been pretty heavy in terms of extreme events
in ocean warming, but there is this silver lining that I w
ant
to leave you with. It's said, these same
environmental downers can actually help select for tolerance to the climate stressors that
characterize extreme events. Populations that have undergone the selection could be used
as targets for restoration, which will boost
climate resilience in natural populations. This work will hopefully demonstrate how
selection might be happening in our local kelp force out here in our backyard, and it'll build a record of
local population diversity as it potent
ially fluctuates with each environmental
preservation. I hope reframing
this perception of climate extremes as
opportunities for developing resilience
might inspire and direct our ongoing efforts in the context of
kelp restoration. In closing, sincerely, heartfelt thanks to
the Hold Fast team, and the Birch Aquarium
for having me here today. To everyone who came here
tonight to be a part of this steadily growing
kelp culture, thank you. Hi everybody. Thanks
for coming tonight. Thank you Mo for s
etting
the stage so well with such a great
representation of your work. I'm Oriana Poindexter, I'm a photo based artist and a marine scientist working at the intersection of science, art, and the ocean. I've always been most
comfortable in the water, and my favorite way
to communicate is to collect and share fragments
of the natural world. I studied biology and visual arts as an
undergraduate at Princeton. I fell in love with
photography as a way to create an image of something that
I'd found ou
t in nature, and the tangible physical craft of black and white
dark room printing. The magic of
chemistry and light, the alchemy of watching the moment in time be
transferred to paper, the image surfacing
through the developer. When I moved down to San
Diego just over a decade ago, I quickly landed at this Scripps Institution of Oceanography just down the hill. I was sucked into the orbit of SIO by the marine collections. There's hundreds of
thousands of jars with preserved marine organisms, ea
ch of which contains the
story of an individual, a fish, a worm, a snail, the place it came from, and the person who
collected and studied it. The exhibit that Hold Fast
replaced, called oddities, was a celebration of
these marine collections, and contained some of
these photographs. I've photographed hundreds of specimens from the
Scripps collections, attempting to find the
good side of a snail fish, creating the portraits
with dignity for each of these creatures that
have been pulled from the
depths to join the
scientific record. I've always been a swimmer, but I started surfing and
diving in earnest here in San Diego in 2013 and 2014, when the kelp canopy was
at its historic height. Free diving and scuba diving
from shore in those years, I began to develop a relationship
with these local spots. Each one has a
distinct personality, with a certain set
of inhabitants, characteristics, behaviors,
underwater landscapes, and things to watch for. When I first started
diving in giant kelp,
it was pretty easy to find, dense amber and full of life. I've been photographing in
the kelp for a decade now. I started photographing with a 35 millimeter film camera
underwater, the Nikonos III. Cameras and the tools of photography are a
license of a kind, a ticket for me to get
outside and go exploring. Taking it underwater
one breath at a time, let me begin to learn about the kelp forest and all the
creatures that call it home. The kelp forest can
be a difficult place to make a picture. How
ever, the conditions
are not always ideal. Sometimes you can't see more than a few feet in front of you. Like many photographers, I had images in my head that
I wanted to capture, and kept trying for. One of these imaginary
pictures was an evenly lit stand of giant
kelp from top to bottom, so you could see
the whole thing, all of the details,
all of the scale. If you dive in the kelp, you know this is impossible. There's a single
natural light source in the ocean and it's the sun, and it comes i
n very
unilateral direction. After the marine heat
wave of 2014 and 2015, and the multiple years of
summer water temperatures hitting 80 degrees, the kelp started
getting harder to find. I had to swim
farther from shore, testing some diabetic
relationships beyond their limits, as I wanted to swim out
farther and farther, almost to the forest, I swear it's just
past that buoy. One day in July 2018
off of Sanitas, I took the picture
that I had in my head. The water had gotten so hot that the kelp
was
literally melting, its buoyant nematicides
had dissolved away, releasing their gas
into the water. The tall standing kelp
had gone from tall and vertical to long
and horizontal, laying down flat at the
bottom of the ocean. I hovered over it and
snapped this picture. Delighted at my find. It wasn't until later that I
put all the pieces together, realizing why this
picture had come into being and what that meant. The more time I
spent in the kelp, the more I realized
how integral it was to be
thinking about the
entire ecosystem, and that there was a
disconnect between a lot of the fisheries and
conservation work that was the focus of my
time at my work at the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration for a number of years, missing the forest
for the trees. The feeling I wanted to
communicate was one of awe, one of wonder, the
feeling of being small, of being a visitor, a witness to something so much bigger, stronger, older, more powerful and more
important than you or I. Some p
eople find the seeking
out of this feeling to be strange, scary, or dark. But I think it's
critical to find it and experience it
in your own way. For me, visiting the forest and finding this feeling is
an experience of joy. It's a revelation to apply the abilities that
I'm lucky to possess. The ability to enter the water, to kick my legs and hold my
breath and open my eyes, and to use these abilities
to bear witness to the world of individuals
below the surface. It's a world without
cell phones,
without emails, without
calendar notifications. It's a world full of creatures, interconnected neighbors, and relationships between
locals and visitors. It's a world entirely
beyond my control, and that I can only enter when
the conditions are right, and with the unspoken acceptance of the risk that's represented by crossing that threshold. I'm often asked
how I came up with the idea to create
cyanotypes of seaweed. This is not a new idea. The cyanotype, or sun printing, is a really early
form
of photography, invented in the 1840s. It utilizes a combination
of two iron salts that become sensitive to UV light when mixed in the
right proportion. It doesn't require a dark
room or even a camera. It exposes in sunlight
and it requires only water to process the resulting image and
create an archival print. I'm not the first one to combine
it with seaweeds either. Anna Atkins did that
in England in 1843. She created the first book
of photographs in the world, and there are
cyanotypes of seaw
eed. About five years ago, I realized that I could use
cyanotype chemistry to make images not just of the
kelp, but with the kelp. That if I could find paper
or fabric big enough, that I could make an image
with the kelp at kelp size. I could make an image
like the one I had photographed in 2018, of the melted evenly
laying down kelp, but without having to wait
for a devastating heat wave. I've been dreaming about making this silk forest since that day. It was just a figment of
my imagination fo
r years. Even as I started telling
friends, first on whispers, could you imagine
forest of cyanotypes, kelp sized, big enough
to swim through. Then I started writing it down, daring to include in proposals
that kept going nowhere. It takes a lot to
build a forest. I came to the aquarium with the idea for this
show last year. This is Megan wearing one
of the early samples. Like you do. As one does. I'm in the
background making the print. I'm still in shock that this
forest actually exists. It's b
een an absolute joy and
privilege to have met and collaborated with Megan and the whole exhibits team here, to craft this exhibit from the proposal that
I had presented. As soon as I met Megan
and dared to show her a small sample of
the silk sayanna type, she saw the forest. No more explanation needed. I made the images that
you see in the exhibit in the six weeks
between Thanksgiving and New Year's of 2023. I created nine original
pieces, one of a kind, cyanotypes on panels of
paper ranging in
size from 12.5-16.5 feet long
and three feet wide. To make each image, I first mix the
chemistry and painted onto the paper at
night in my studio. The next day I go free diving in the
cold forest outside of the marine protected areas
at some of the same sites that Mo uses as field sites. Looking for exactly
the right specimen, I look around the forest for individuals that speak to me. Some days I don't find
what I'm looking for. Each piece is truly a collaboration
with the environment, the condi
tions,
and what the ocean is willing to allow
me to collect. I select individual
strands of kelp that are as large as the
paper I have prepared. For these, I was
collecting pieces 12-16 feet long in the ocean. I break off one strand from
the larger individual, like taking a single branch from a tree and then return
to the surface. I put the piece in my bag
and then swim back to shore. Back at my studio, I pulled the kelp from
my bag and carefully pat dry each and every blade. I get to know the s
pecimen
this way, as an individual. In the crowd, in the forest, they all appear quite similar, but each one is unique
in the way people are. I carefully lay
the kelp out over the light sensitive
paper I prepared, composing a portrait
of the strand of kelp in a way that will
capture both the scale, and the details that make
that individual unique. When it's right, I pull the paper with the kelp
over it into sunlight, where the exposure is created. Anything covered up by the kelp stays lighter in
color while any part of the paper fully exposed to the light
turns dark blue. The exposure time depends
on the intensity of the sun usually between
10 and 20 minutes. After exposing, I return the whole situation
to the shade, remove the kelp, and wash the image in water
to process it. For this exhibit, we chose to use reproductions instead of originals to create something safe, immersive,
and interactive. We digitize those
original prints I showed earlier at life size scale and printed them on
100% silk to create the 27 hanging panels
that you can see, touch and swim through today. The paper originals are
still safe in a box at my studio if anybody
wants to see them. Each cyanotype photogram that I make is a portrait
of that individual. By recording the time, place, and species of
each specimen I collect, I'm creating a collected
portrait of that place, allowing each specimen to image itself in this light
sensitive material. The three small
pieces that you see when you first enter
the
exhibit over here are photograms
made with giant kelp, but not with kelp that I
collected in the ocean. These three pieces are made with six month old giant kelp babies, sporophytes grown
by Mohammad, etc. In the lab just down the hill. You can see the
individual variation, the differences and size of
individuals of the same age, and the first
growth of what will become a hold fast on each one. The blue ones are cyanotypes made with
the same chemistry as the large silks. The pink one is a lumen
print. It's a different chemistry, but it's the same idea of kelp over light sensitive
paper in the sun. I create this work because I love the experience
of making it. It's an experience
that brings me joy, to enter the ocean, to leave daily life
at the shoreline, and unburden myself
in the water. To experience the beauty and the terror of life underwater, and to bear witness to the
changes that we are causing. To create a document of
that experience and to make it relevant to the scientific
re
cord in my own way. I'm often asked what I want people to take
away from my work, and I have trouble
answering that question. If I'm making it for anyone, it's for the forest, for the individuals whose
portraits are being created. This is my own relationship
with the ocean, with the forest, and it manifests
in these images. The fact that the pictures, the original unique objects can go on to have a life
where they interact with you and can get
you excited about this environment is
an incredible
bonus. If I'm pushed to
answer the question, I hope that the work
can inspire awe for the marine environment
and a desire to go develop your own
relationship with nature, whatever form that
takes for you. It's still really surreal to see this exhibit come to life
in such a complete way. This is the third time I've had the opportunity to show my work, alongside the gyotaku
work of Dwight Hwang, whose individual portraits
of fish, lobster, crabs, and seaweed bring this
cyanotype forest to life. Th
e exhibit has evolved to include the creativity
of the entire team. It takes a village
to build a forest, and this one exists thanks to Megan Dickerson, Dwight Hwang, Rob Brad, Tina Mao,
Mohammad Sedarat, Jen Smith, Marianne Byster, and Audi Ken, just
to name a few. I'll leave you with this.
There's a sister exhibit on view through April 21 at the UC San Diego
Geysl Library just up the hill and I had the honor
of curating this exhibit. Ebb and Flow, giant kelp forests through art science
and the
archives, which includes 36
works by four artists, Dwight Hwang, Marie
McCkenzie, Julia C.R. Gray and myself dialogue with 25 original seaweed
pressings made by scientists and
citizens with seaweed collected in La Jolla
between 1890 and 2023. If you want more seaweed,
there's plenty more. Thank you, and I look
forward to your question Again, I'm Megan Dickerson,
Director of Exhibits, and I can't believe I get
to work with these people. I'm so in love with this
project and this work. Hopefully,
you feel that too. The passion, the joy, all while we're doing something that's
really challenging. I think a lot about what Katherine Hayhoe wrote
about rational hope, if you're familiar
with her work, and I want to read it before
we start the discussion. She writes that her
hope is not based on burying my head in the sand or practicing positive thinking. My hope begins with looking
at how bad this is. True hope, rational hope, muscular hope begins with looking clear eyed at
just how bad it is,
just how high the risk is, how small the chance
of success is. Hope is that small chance, however improbable,
of something better. How we get there is
recognizing that it's not guaranteed, but it's possible. The only way it's possible is
if we do everything we can. Does anybody feel
that? You know? I'm looking at both
of your work and the feeling of being in the kelp forest and
being with nature, which we hope we've simulated through
the experience here. The feeling of
looking at baby kelp whic
h I never thought
I'd think were so cute. I had this squeeze moment
every time I see them. I'm just like baby kelp. But at the same time, understanding that there's this great risk
and this great challenge. I don't know how
to do small talk, so I'm just going to
go straight into that. How do you balance that? How do you balance in your work, the knowledge that you have? Like the work that you've done, that every animal
that you've studied, has been impacted by climate
in the last 10 years. How d
o you balance that joy and that reality at the same
time? You're welcome. Thank you so much. That keeps me going that it's a love
hate situation for sure. I only realized some of the impact that climate
change has had on these previous projects I was chatting about very recently. It was almost like a
retrospective realization that though this has definitely influenced
every step I've made, every turn that I've made
to get to this point. I wouldn't be here without it. Which is both amazing but al
so, it's a scary driving
force, that we're here. I think that I'm not the only one that's having
this experience, which is also what
keeps me going. Here I'm sitting next
to another example. We're all noticing and we're acting in a direction
that reacts to how climate has affected all of these
different organisms, these ecosystems
that we're studying. I guess it's a catalyst
for everything that I do. I think that's a good way of
putting it as a catalyst. For me, I had a job where I was ostensibl
y
working in that direction, but it didn't feel
impactful to me. I just started
diving more and just doing these things that
felt good to me physically, of diving, of creating
these images. Then the fact that they can go on and be seen and
create these conversations and then create the
opportunity to have these discussions was not my
intention at the beginning. It's been a really
wonderful surprise. I was thinking a little
bit earlier about how you both are people
who pay attention, and that's t
he work of artists. I think that's where artists and scientists really intersect. It's just noticing and what you notice might be a
little bit different. I think as scientists, you're trained to focus
on that one thing, whether it's squid or abalone, and you're not seeing
the bigger picture. Have you had any
challenges of pushing that forward to see the
forest for the trees? Definitely. But it helps to
just make the time to go observe without an agenda necessarily to try to
see it with fresh eye
s. Then I think that's when you have the opportunity
to see something new. That's a really good point
with the abalone research, realizing that they're living
in an environment that is soon going to be at even more risk compared to
the abalone themselves. That was a big like,
we can zoom out and recognize that there is a forest for the
trees situation here. Sometimes it slaps you in the
face and you realize when you're just way too focused under a
microscope or underwater, looking way too close
to the sea floor. It's like if you've seen the baby kelp that
are growing in the refrigerator in hold fast. I was mentioning how kids are obsessed with it and
they're staring at it. Just watching it like
it's a screen almost, and they're watching all
these tiny little movements. I told this to Mo
and Mo was like, well that's basically
what I do all day. It's a bit of an intersection. It's just noticing. I was making this other triple
Venn diagram of artists, scientists and children being aware a
nd paying attention
to the world around us. Was there a story that
made you move away from the specifics to really
thinking about the habitat? Was there a moment that
you can look back to? Not a specific moment in time, but I was just
thinking, actually, when you were just answering
that last question. I learned scientific
scuba diving very early on in my
scuba diving career. You're taught to have
a task underwater, which is great because you are
very focused on that task. For a long time,
that
task was like find as many abalone
as possible. You're on the bottom and you're looking underneath everything. You're not looking
up almost ever. I went scuba diving recently
with a group of artists, and usually I go free
diving with artists. I don't go scuba
diving with artists. We went scuba diving and I went straight to the
bottom looking for abalone. I lost my buddies
because they stayed halfway down the water column, taking in the forest. I was at bottom, I was
like, what are you guys doing
? We got to look for stuff. Yeah, I don't know if that directly answers your question, but that was a moment relatively recently
where I realized a mental switch of observation
and of experience. Yeah. In that moment, you were
still reevaluating? Yeah, I put the
science gear back on, I put scuba diving
stuff back on, and I was back in
like science head. You're in very science head
right now PhD student. How do you go in and out of it, do you go back and forth? Oriana definitely
brings me out of
it in a really good way
when we intersect. Awesome. A little aside, there's a psychology class
that Jen teaches, art, my advisor at UCSC,
every other year, and we're all in
this class right now together going through
it and enjoying. It's been a nice way to
interact and think about all the seaweed that is around me when I'm
doing my science, but also in a
different perspective. I like to think, I don't think I've told you
this but when we're in class and I see you
working with the specimens, I t
ry to think okay, what's going on in Oriana's
head right now? Like what perspective
does she have? That sometimes helps me reframe what my approach is as
well because you also have the scientific background
as well and you've mixed that very nicely with the
visual art form as well. It's definitely a role
model in that sense too. I'm learning a lot
in Seaweed class. I'm learning a lot
from what you're learning in Seaweed
class. I mean, just. Like a chain up the hill. Exactly. She'd be like,
did y
ou know this? This one's so cute. No, I'm talking about Seaweed is cute. This is a real sea
change for me, like moving from my other work, just suddenly thinking,
oh my goodness, Clinton and Seaweed are so cute. But maybe you're saying that we should have an
artist embedded in every class just
every science class to help you see things a
little bit differently. Maybe the opposite is true too having scientists
in art class. That's your background.
Your degree is similar to that
from Princeton. Ye
ah, I've always had this
wanting to be on both sides of the science and
the art equation and never quite understanding why I'm supposed to choose one, but I've been lucky to find a path where I can
combine the two of them. I think historically,
in the 1840s, 1850s, as these art processes
were being invented, photography wasn't really around scientists were expected
to be artists also. They had to illustrate
what they were finding. That was the only
way to communicate it and at some point that ha
s separated as
technology has evolved and scientists are
still expected to be many different things, but artists is no longer
one of them necessarily. I've always felt that they
are very interconnected and come from the same curiosity and like you were
saying earlier, this need to observe
nature. Yeah,. Sorry. I get distracted
because there's so many good conversations
that have happened. I also want to, by the way, point out if he's here, Itamar, Leland, where are you? There you are. Ita
is the
maker of the giant kelp lantern,
if you saw it. If you haven't had
a chance to go in the exhibit, it's right there. Some of you may be able to
see it from your seats. It's entirely made of giant kelp everything but no non kelp. A lot of it was harvested from what we were moving out
of our own kelp tank here. I think that there's in addition
to this conversation of where the arts and
sciences intersect, it's also where does that go? Each is also working
on a kelp based paint. I think that this
e
xhibit here is about being in the space
about marinating in it, about having conversations
in the kelp forest, but it's also about inspiring
what more might be done. That's my favorite definition of play is what more might be done. What more might happen.
I know we want to open up to some questions. Yeah. This is mostly for
Mohammad, I think. Can you talk about the effect of the warming of the water on sea urchins and the impact
of them on the hold fast, in addition to the plant itself being aff
ected by
the hotter water. Yeah, great. If anyone's aware, in Northern California, around the same time
that we've been talking, there was a series of heat waves and the kelp
forests that were up in Northern California
and the North Coast all also melted away like
Oriana mentioned in her talk, the waters that
eventually cooled down, and what we would have expected was the kelp to
return to that area, but instead, it did shift, it shifted into
an urchin barren. This is a situation where
the sea f
loor is covered by a disproportionately
high amount of urchins compared to any other
organism on the sea floor, including outlawing including
kelp that they love to eat. When the waters get warmer
or they stay warmer, this, in a nutshell, can reduce the predation effort. It removes the predators on urchins that you would find
in these environments. Some of that is
because of disease. Like certain types of sea stars, like the one that
we just heard about earlier today got wiped out when the water
got warm and they usually keep the urchin
population in control. They're one of the
players in that. A lot fell apart in
that and this is what led to the urchins to be able to explode the way they did. I guess just touching
on it again, but you asked about what
temperature does to help itself. I mean, at some point it's a threshold where it just
starts to melt away, but before it gets to
that crazy red line, another, I guess
it's a paired issue. When the water starts to rise or the water is
gen
erally warmer, that also usually equates
to lower nutrients in the water column which the kelp is hungry
for all the time. It grows so fast, like down to, it grows so fast per day that
we can actually describe the rate of growth of giant
kelp in miles per hour. It's like 0.2 miles per hour, but we can see it essentially
almost with our naked eyes. That means it's very
hungry. It needs nutrients. Usually our coastal systems are, at least here in
California especially, there is the presence
of a v
ery strong upwelling current
that brings deeper, cold, nutrient rich waters. We can't have one
without the other. When the waters are warm, that generally also means there's less nutrients for the
kelp to even do its thing. It's usually nutrients tend
to be the problem first. As the temperatures
get even warmer, it's just all bets are off
and stuff starts to melt. Thank you for a
great presentation. I love the format. I love how engaged you are. This is amazing. My question has to do with
intern
al waves entitled forcing in the canyons
which might bring colder water up
into the kelp beds. I was wondering if you see
any spatial relationship with the canyons and this forcing
function. Thank you. Why haven't we talked
earlier? This is great. There's a couple of
papers that came out not too long
ago, like in 2012, about La Jolla's kelp
patch especially and that submarine canyon just north
of that extent in the cove. You're absolutely right, like you're hitting the
nail on the head, but what
they also found when they started
checking the temperature in the water column across all of La Jolla from
north to south, they found that on average
temperatures closer to the Canyon towards the north of La Jolla footprint were actually
like a little bit warmer. Then what you'd find
further away from the submarine
canyon in the south and that has exactly to do what they describe as
with internal waves. The high amplitude
internal waves traveling out of the
canyon which is what lets them get es
sentially
so tall, if you will, that mixes the water column so well right when it
comes out the gates out of the canyon that the warmer
waters near the surface of what the kelp
forest experience gets mixed really well with the deeper, normally colder waters. That causes this
whole environment like from surface to sea floor, to be just a little bit warmer. That's crazy for me, that's got my attention because
in heat wave events, what's already a little
bit of a warmer part of, at least in the
hol
iest kelp forest, might get that much more warm. You wonder like, are
the kelp that are living there or trying to live, adapted to that
warmer environment. Are they actually
okay or are they just barely hanging on normally? As soon as there's
a heat wave event, they're the first ones to go
so I don't know, but great. I was looking almost
like a plant question. That's so good. Thank you. I have a question. Years ago we had Kelco that
had a fleet of kelp cutters, and at that time they claim they w
orked on the health
of the kelp beds. Have you seen any evidence of what happened while
they were working and what has happened
since then as affecting the comings and
goings of the kelp beds. Right around again,
everything's 2013. Where were you in 2013? What did the kelp look like too? I remember right around
when I was finishing up the squid project that
I was talking about, the Kelco was still very
present here off La Jolla, off of our coast, in San Diego. I didn't even think
twice about it,
there was that much help
for them to collect. It was dense, it didn't see, they were just shaving
off the surface. It seemed like it was fine. I don't know if that's all talk or if that's
actually true. I never saw anything about that, but it also wasn't the height of my time in the kelp forest. I was in and around it, but I was studying squid
I was studying abalone. I never saw them doing much
more than collecting kelp, which at the time was perfectly it wasn't
just sustainable. It almost mayb
e was a good, it was like volcanoes
coming through causing that disturbance. Maybe actually
promoted the health. Unless that was the
angle they were working. We're shaving, we're pruning the leaves and we're
inspiring new growth. Unless that was the
angle, I'm not too sure. There was much more going on. Yeah, but now they're further south, they're
in Mexico now. There's really not
much here for them. You saw in those figures, so we can ask them the next
time they come back north.
Comments
Such valuable insights, thanks!
Continued weakening of the Earth's magnetic field is the main reason for "our" climate problems... Period.. Right now the field has been weakened by an estimated 25-30%.. The problem is continuous.. There's nothing any or all of us can do other than prepare..