Bloomberg's Kurt Wagner joins Ed Ludlow and Caroline Hyde to discuss Tucker Carlson's announcement of his Vladimir Putin interview on X, and what that means for advertisers on Elon Musk's social platform. He speaks on "Bloomberg Technology."
Read: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-02-06/tucker-carlson-says-he-ll-interview-putin-about-ukraine-war
--------
Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg Technology on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrM7B7SL_g1edFOnmj-SDKg
Watch the latest full episodes of "Bloomberg Technology" with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow here: https://tinyurl.com/ycyevxda
Get the latest in tech from Silicon Valley and around the world here:
https://www.bloomberg.com/technology
Connect with us on...
Twitter: https://twitter.com/technology
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BloombergTechnology
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bloombergbusiness/
Give us the context of what this makes
advertisers feel like. Yeah, well, obviously there are a lot of
advertisers who would be very reluctant to see their brand show up anywhere near
this interview. Right.
But I also think that a lot of advertisers who are uncomfortable with
that are probably no longer on. I think a lot of the people who are
still spending money on X have pretty thick skin when it comes to what they
expect or imagine that their marketing is going to appear next to.
Right. And s
o I'm not sure that we're
necessarily going to see a new wave of people rushing in the other direction,
mostly because a lot of those people are already on.
And this speaks, of course, to the ultimate aim that we've always been told
from Elon Musk about X is for for freedom of speech in all its entirety.
So tell us a little bit about how ultimately the deals with the likes of
Tucker Carlson are going getting on very people who attract a big crowd to come
and ultimately have shows on the platform
.
Yeah. You know, I was really interested in
this. About a month ago, right after CBS, when
X announced that they were going to be doing these new shows.
Don Lemon, of course, was another one who they were going to bring on.
And, you know, I spoke to four media agencies, you know, after the
announcement was made. And all of them basically said the same
thing, that these shows aren't really going to move the needle.
Now, if you're a big brand looking to spend money on X, it might be nice to
have
sort of something that at least as professionally produced that you can,
you know, run your video ad next to. But until X gets, you know, a much
larger collection of these types of shows with much more and less
controversial hosts, quite frankly, I'm not sure that this is the kind of thing
that's going to draw advertisers back. And again, I don't think they're running
the other way because those folks are already gone.
But I don't think this is necessarily big enough that it's going to lure
peop
le back who have been reluctant to spend money on acts to begin with.
There's a lot happening in the social media space in real time.
But you reported that Jack Dorsey's Blue Sky, the decentralized social media
platform, is now opened up to everyone. Why is that significant?
Well, blue sky, as you both probably know, has emerged as sort of one of the
main alternatives to ex ever since Elon Musk took over.
And, you know, there's a bunch of technical reasons that people are
excited about it. You k
now, this decentralized element is
is idealistic, I think. But for the most part, this is simply a
place where people who used to love Twitter but no longer feel comfortable
using X have been going. And so the fact that they're sort of
opening this up to everybody, you know, perhaps that will kind of expedite the
growth of blue sky. But, you know, again, we're looking at
threads, we're looking at blue sky. You might even remember Mastodon.
These were essentially X alternatives. And so it's just
always interesting to
keep tabs on what they're doing and whether or not they're still growing and
capturing people who are running away from X.
Your book on X is imminent or your book on Twitter.
I mean Twitter. That's right.
As with you. So much has changed in real time.
We would we were teasing Jason Stride ever day about how you to rewrite the
last graph of his book based on what happened with Blizzard.
But something you just said, Blue sky is the alternative to X.
Where do you think X sits
in the landscape right now?
Matter, Facebook, snap, Instagram reels, things like that.
Sure. You know, I still feel like it's a good
place to go for certain types of news, right?
I'm a big sports fan. I still think that X is probably the
best place to go when you want to figure out, Hey, what's going on?
My favorite team, what's going on in the NFL playoffs?
But there's a bunch of other categories of news that I think that ex used to
sort of be the go to place for where it's no longer that or it
's certainly
not as reliable as it used to be. And I think there's a bunch of reasons
for that. The most notable probably being the
change in verification. Right.
And sort of eliminating this ability to quickly identify who legitimate
journalists are versus folks who might not be doing that professionally.
And to me, I think that's hurt the company when it comes to news.
But obviously, Ellen would disagree. And, you know, for that reason, I feel
like X is sort of fallen out of the position that
it had over news over
Instagram, Facebook and others few years ago.
Comments
The idea that a journalist is being punished for journalism is disgusting and disturbing.
Choosing to talk about g'damn ads instead of the state of journalism says it all for me. MSM is history.
It makes twitter a better center of journalism than Bloomberg.
How stupid are advertisers? Whats wrong with free speech?
Why would corporations be against independent journalism unless they are the enemy of the people?
I didn't realize Bloomberg still existed.
The more people like you panic about an interview with Puton, the more I want to see it. I just have to know what has got you so shook. ๐ง
Im not a big fan of social media, but I'm excited about the interview Tucker is doing. I just might as well set up an account on 'X'.
Journalism is what journalists used to do in the old days. Tucker is one of the rare few still doing that today. How dare you, Tucker!๐
Its hilarious to see mainstream media in a fit of jealousy they couldn't get a scoop like this.
Itโs called free speech. We as humans can decide what to believe or not. Itโs not the medias job to decide for us
What are all these guys scared of? If you are not lying about things then why are you scared?? Let him interview the man
That interview would have more than 3 billion views in the first week
the MSM is losing their damn minds over this. i love it ๐๐
If any company wishes to not promote freedom of speech, then so be it..... These companies should be listed so the public can choose not to use their products.....
What has happened to journalism? These people are so out of touch. They are the true enemy of the people.
Lamestream mediaโs meltdown just made me subscribe to the Tucker Carlson Network!!!๐ค๐ผโ๐ผ๐บ๐ธ๐บ๐ธ
How come it was okay for example Barbara Walters to interview world leaders? Including villainous dictators? All of a sudden a journalist is not allowed?
We are lost - Journalism has become so corrupted that good journalism is becoming risky . We need to hear Putin speak - Does that make us bad ? What the hell happened to journalism ?
Tucker Carlson is a refreshing voice, compared to most (if not all) main-stream media, he earn the credit ๐